On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:33:37PM -0500, Christopher Hackman wrote:
> Is it possible to customize the following error message?
>
> MAIL FROM:
> 250 2.1.0 Ok
> RCPT TO:
> 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address
> rejected: virtualdomain.com
>
> In this sanitized example, "virtualdomain.com" is just that
Bonjour mouss,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:53:42PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> /dev/rob0 a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:23:38AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> /dev/rob0:
> >> The purpose of the submission service is to accept mail only from
> >> authenticated clients.
> >
> > This, I underst
Hi all.
Our internal postfix server relays all outbound mail thru an external host.
How can I set it to use a different relay server when the email comes from
a specified domain? Eg. j...@domain1.com -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (default),
m...@domain2.com -> yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
Thanks.
-JK
Jack Knowlton:
> Hi all.
> Our internal postfix server relays all outbound mail thru an external host.
> How can I set it to use a different relay server when the email comes from
> a specified domain? Eg. j...@domain1.com -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (default),
> m...@domain2.com -> yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
Postfix
Jack Knowlton put forth on 1/9/2010 9:57 AM:
> Hi all.
> Our internal postfix server relays all outbound mail thru an external host.
> How can I set it to use a different relay server when the email comes from
> a specified domain? Eg. j...@domain1.com -> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (default),
> m...@domain2.c
Hi,
I will try all your advises, but something still very strange for me:
We see that postfix logs show that ehlo process is very slow through
postfix but very fast by hand. Even I have recorded through
tcpdump/WireShark and I can see that messages are sent very very very
quickly in about 1 s
Hi all,
I got these statistics:
Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: start
interval Jan 9 19:09:03
Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: domain lookup
hits=110 miss=89 success=55%
Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: address
lo
Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 11:17 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> I got these statistics:
>
> Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: start
> interval Jan 9 19:09:03
> Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: domain lookup
> hits=110 miss=89 success=55%
> Jan 9 1
Hi Stan,
Thanks for your interest.
Le 09/01/2010 20:21, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 11:17 AM:
Hi all,
I got these statistics:
Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: start
interval Jan 9 19:09:03
Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[
Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 11:07 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I will try all your advises, but something still very strange for me:
>
> We see that postfix logs show that ehlo process is very slow through
> postfix but very fast by hand. Even I have recorded through
> tcpdump/WireShark and I can see t
Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 12:37 PM:
> I wen t there but did not find explanations about miss address lookup or
> miss domain lookup.
> While I have 122,000 messages in active queue I still don't understand
> why statistics show max simultaneous domains=1. It should be dozens , or
> hund
Le 09/01/2010 20:54, Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 12:37 PM:
I wen t there but did not find explanations about miss address lookup or
miss domain lookup.
While I have 122,000 messages in active queue I still don't understand
why statistics show max simultaneou
Patrick Chemla put forth on 1/9/2010 1:08 PM:
> You mean 100% success?
Yes.
> Before I set up the postfix relay to load balance between 30 qmail
> servers, each of them was able to accept in his own queue hundreds
> thousands email. Email were sent by campaigns of thousands balanced on 3
> qmail
Patrick Chemla:
> Hi all,
>
> I got these statistics:
>
> Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: start
> interval Jan 9 19:09:03
> Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: domain lookup
> hits=110 miss=89 success=55%
> Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scach
Wietse Venema:
> Patrick Chemla:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I got these statistics:
> >
> > Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: start
> > interval Jan 9 19:09:03
> > Jan 9 19:15:21 postfix postfix/scache[18038]: statistics: domain lookup
> > hits=110 miss=89 success=55%
> > Ja
Hi.
Is there somewhere some documentation how each of the exit codes from
sysexit.h is interpreted by Postfix when used with pipe(8) (returned
e.g. by maildrop)?
I just now the EX_TEMPFAIL means that mail is defered, and I assume
EX_UNAVAILABLE leads to a bounce.
What about the others?
Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> Hi.
>
> Is there somewhere some documentation how each of the exit codes from
> sysexit.h is interpreted by Postfix when used with pipe(8) (returned
> e.g. by maildrop)?
I naively assume that the sysexits.h names speak for themselves.
> I just now the EX_TEMPFAIL
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 19:58 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> EX_TEMPFAIL defers mail, as does EX_OSERR (system resource not
> available). All others are hard coded as non-retryable.
Thanks.
> Making this
> configurable is a couple hours of work (design a user interface,
> implement the code, test th
Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 19:58 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > EX_TEMPFAIL defers mail, as does EX_OSERR (system resource not
> > available). All others are hard coded as non-retryable.
> Thanks.
>
> > Making this
> > configurable is a couple hours of work (design a user i
19 matches
Mail list logo
