sendmail binary with reject_unknown_sender_domain reject_non_fqdn_sender

2009-12-26 Thread Robert Schetterer
Hi @ll, merry X-mas i have a webserver with some customers using binary sendmail command deliver out mail to local postfix from the www-data apache with i.e perl scripts, by ignorance of the customers the often dont debug their scripts ( in time ) is there a setup which rejects mails from sendmail

Re: sendmail binary with reject_unknown_sender_domain reject_non_fqdn_sender

2009-12-26 Thread Wietse Venema
Robert Schetterer: > Hi @ll, > merry X-mas > > i have a webserver with some customers > using binary sendmail command deliver out mail to local postfix from the > www-data apache with i.e perl scripts, by ignorance of the customers the > often dont debug their scripts ( in time ) > is there a setu

General mail delivery question

2009-12-26 Thread Edwin Minneboo
Hi all, I wonder how and why mail is delivered in the following case: I own a domain, let's say example.com. In this domain mail for user w...@example.com is delivered to e...@example.com. Now I find mail for To: wilma.vivi...@nwu.ac.za Delivered-To: e...@example.com As I don't underst

Re: General mail delivery question

2009-12-26 Thread Martijn de Munnik
brand+new, 0.93921, > Date*Sat+26, 0.06236, > our+website, 0.93752, > brand, 0.93720, > Best+regards, 0.08001, > com , 0.90646 > > > __ NOD32 EMON 4717 (20091226) informatie __ > > Dit bericht is gecontroleerd door het NOD32 antivirus systeem: > e-mail with subject General mail delivery question dated 12/26/2009 21:08 - > is OK > > http://www.nod32.nl

RE: General mail delivery question

2009-12-26 Thread Edwin Minneboo
international, 0.95316, to+order, 0.95145, brand+new, 0.93921, Date*Sat+26, 0.06236, our+website, 0.93752, brand, 0.93720, Best+regards, 0.08001, com , 0.90646 __ NOD32 EMON

smtpd_helo_required compliance with the RFC

2009-12-26 Thread Philippe Cerfon
Hi list. I was recently looking over my postfix config and RFC 5321 in order to see whether everything seems still to be compliant (not postfix,.. but my config ;) ). Then I stumbled accross the following: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.1.4 says: A session that will contain mail tra

Re: smtpd_helo_required compliance with the RFC

2009-12-26 Thread Len Conrad
>Hi list. > >I was recently looking over my postfix config and RFC 5321 in order to >see whether everything seems still to be compliant (not postfix,.. but >my config ;) ). > >Then I stumbled accross the following: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.1.4 says: >A session that will contai

Re: General mail delivery question

2009-12-26 Thread Wietse Venema
Edwin Minneboo: > Now I find mail for To: wilma.vivi...@nwu.ac.za Delivered-To: e...@example.com You need to learn the difference between the message HEADER (rfc5322) and the message ENVELOPE (rfc5321). For example, the header of this reply says To: postfix-users, however the envelope has your em

ldap-trouble (continued)

2009-12-26 Thread Jan Lühr
Hello @all, after setting up ldap and working for a while, something is screwed up again. Although the address is found in the first run, a second query without local part is fired. What may be wrong here? main.cf says: myhostname = localhost alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases alias_database = hash:

Re: ldap-trouble (continued)

2009-12-26 Thread Wietse Venema
Jan L?hr: > virtual_alias_domains = v50993.topnetworks.de > virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf v50993.topnetworks.de is listed in virtual_alias_domains. Therefore, all users in that domain must exist virtual_alias_maps as u...@v50993.topnetworks.de. See also: http://www.pos

Re: smtpd_helo_required compliance with the RFC

2009-12-26 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Len Conrad put forth on 12/26/2009 3:49 PM: > Requiring HELO is hardly an RFC-abusive setting. I expect almost no legit, > nor illegit, SMTP servers send EXPN or VRFY before helo, I'll add that just about everyone disables VRFY these days to prevent valid address harvesting, so if 5321 or any

Re: smtpd_helo_required compliance with the RFC

2009-12-26 Thread Wietse Venema
Philippe Cerfon: > Hi list. > > I was recently looking over my postfix config and RFC 5321 in order to > see whether everything seems still to be compliant (not postfix,.. but > my config ;) ). > > Then I stumbled accross the following: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.1.4 says: > A

Delivery to multiple locations

2009-12-26 Thread Michael
Hello all, I am transistioning an ISP from Sendmail to Postfix with MySQL backend. Mostly this has gone smoothly except that one of the curve balls I have been thrown is in respect of their use of the Alias file as follows: usernameusername, email address etc... I need to find a way to

sending mail to user @ mydomain

2009-12-26 Thread Michael
Is there a way to get Postfix to accept mail to user @ $mydomain ? All user accounts used by Postfix are stored in SQL, so these emails are being rejected with 'user unknown in local recipient table'. Thanks for any assistance.

Re: sending mail to user @ mydomain

2009-12-26 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Michael wrote: > Is there a way to get Postfix to accept mail to user @ $mydomain ? Yes. > All user accounts used by Postfix are stored in SQL, so these emails are > being > rejected with 'user unknown in local recipient table'. Configure Postfix to query the SQL table fo

Re: Delivery to multiple locations

2009-12-26 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Michael wrote: > I am transistioning an ISP from Sendmail to Postfix with MySQL backend. > > Mostly this has gone smoothly except that one of the curve balls I have been > thrown is in respect of their use of the Alias file as follows: > > username username, email addr