Re: [OT?] blocking replies (WAS: whitelisting problem)

Hi Stan, On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:24:53 -0600 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Mikael Bak put forth on 12/9/2009 4:18 AM: > > > I understand why you avoid the real question. But hey - it's your server :-) > > Do you? I have avoided it because these threads can quickly delve into > childish mud slinging i

up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

After updating postfix & postgresql (still 8.3 though), postmap lookups to postgres aren't working anymore. I HAVE recompiled postfix rpm to include the postgresql libraries. # rpm -q postfix postgresql-server postfix-2.6.5-2.fc11.i586 (This is actually from a fedora12 SRPM) postgresql-serv

Local Mails not working

Hi, I have already set up DOVECOT + POSTFIX mail server and I can send and receive mails outside my Domain. The problem however is that LOCAL Mail is not working. When I send LOCAL mails, it leaves my system without error messages but it is not received by the recipient. Same thing happens when

Re: up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:42:13AM -0800, Brian Neu wrote: > After updating postfix & postgresql (still 8.3 though), postmap lookups > to postgres aren't working anymore. I HAVE recompiled postfix rpm to > include the postgresql libraries. > > > I get: > > ]# postmap -q testus...@advancedopen.

Re: up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

Devdas, that worked! Sorta. At least now it reveals another message: postmap: warning: connect to pgsql server localhost: FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "dbmail"? but I can psql into the db just fine with those settings. Got it. had to s/localhost/127.0.0.1/ for everything. I h

Re: up'd Fedora from 10->11, now postmap won't query pgsql db

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:33:42AM -0800, Brian Neu wrote: > Devdas, that worked! Sorta. > > At least now it reveals another message: > postmap: warning: connect to pgsql server localhost: FATAL: Ident > authentication failed for user "dbmail"? I bet Postfix is not running as user dbmail and y

forward mail with a local copy

Hi all, I would like to forward all mail as they come(with the same envelope recipient addr.) - it is not problem to do it with transport_map, for example: domain.tldsmtp:remoteserver BUT i would like to keep a local copy too.(for all addresses) I mean, i have 2 almost identical postfix ser

Re: does order of postscreen_* params matter?

Wietse Venema wrote: > The postscreen manpage lists the tests in the order of execution. > Thus, the blacklist is done tested first. If the client is not > blacklisted, then the whitelist test is done. And so on. > > I could swap the order of black/white tests if there is agreement that > the curr

Re: OT: need some advice as to disto - supplementary

On 9-Dec-2009, at 22:23, Eero Volotinen wrote: >> 3) We currently have all our members configured as virtual users with >> all their email stored as maildir stores under /var/mail/example.com. We >> are considering giving each member a personal space, probably under >> /home (there would be no loca

Re: Local Mails not working

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:48:35PM +0100, Alexander wrote: > How do I make LOCAL mails work? > > Attached is output from postconf -n Here I would ask that you spend some time on learning basic computer and email use skills. RTF attachment? Well, at least it was readable, but it would have been be

unknown mail transport error

Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error. I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one and at first I thought everything was working. I am receiving emails to all my mails that are hosted on this server, however I can't send mail from my ser

Re: unknown mail transport error

On 12/10/2009 11:57 AM, c...@mail.bg wrote: > Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error. > > I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one > and at first I thought everything was working. I am receiving emails > to all my mails that are hosted on th

Re: unknown mail transport error

Цитат от Brian Evans - Postfix List : > On 12/10/2009 11:57 AM, c...@mail.bg wrote: >> Hello I'm having weird problems with unknown mail transport error. >> >> I moved a working postfix server from a linux machine to a netbsd one >> and at first I thought everything was working. I am receivi

Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

Hi, after updating Postfix from 2.4.7.5 to 2.6.5.2 I see some changed behaviour in the smtp process delivering to our content_filter. The content filter does not recive the part after the recipient_delimiter as RCPT TO anymore. Caused by this we loose this information for any mail going through am

Re: Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote: > after updating Postfix from 2.4.7.5 to 2.6.5.2 I see some changed You also changed main.cf, or the package update did it for you. > behaviour in the smtp process delivering to our content_filter. The > content filter does not reci

Re: does order of postscreen_* params matter?

Mark Martinec: > Wietse Venema wrote: > > The postscreen manpage lists the tests in the order of execution. > > Thus, the blacklist is done tested first. If the client is not > > blacklisted, then the whitelist test is done. And so on. > > > > I could swap the order of black/white tests if there i

Re: does order of postscreen_* params matter?

>As of snapshot 20091209, postscreen searches the whitelist first. great, thanks Len

Re: Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

Thanks for looking into this, I've attached postconf -n output below. If you need some LDAP queries performed, please let me know. See some answers below as well. On Thu, December 10, 2009 19:37, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote: > >> after up

Re: Mail from cron delay

On 11/30/2009 10:48 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:35:02AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > >> It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" >> and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to >> understand the 24 delay. > > Not really. The message t

Re: Mail from cron delay

Emmett Culley: > snip email header > Received: from den1.thisserver.net (den1.thisserver.net [198.202.202.21]) > by g1.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586C400032 > for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:15:59 -0800 (PST) > Received: by den1.thisserver.net (Postfix, from userid 0) >

Re: Mail from cron delay

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:12:36AM -0800, Emmett Culley wrote: > >> It seems like understanding where the "delay=86457" > >> and "delays=86457/0/0.36/0.18" come from would probably help me to > >> understand the 24 delay. > > > > Not really. The message took 1 day to enter the active queue, not >

Limited a user to 1 e-mail per minute

Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send? -- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630 Merry Christmas 2

Re: Limited a user to 1 e-mail per minute

* The Doctor : > Is there a way to rate limit what a user can send? The policyd policy server can do that. -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and jus

Re: Problem with smtp process / content filter and address rewriting

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Simon Klempert wrote: > >> Dec 10 18:37:07 zimbra postfix/smtp[542]: 81058E3232: > >> to=, orig_to=, > >> relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=14, delays=8.8/0/0.01/4.8, > >> dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok, id=00532-01, from > >> MTA([127.0.0.1]:1

Bounce at SMTPD level

http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error if spamc/spamd deter

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

Thomas Bolioli wrote: http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 erro

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html > > I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring > postfix to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is > complete. I can't seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs > to get a 550 error if spamc/spa

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html > > I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix > to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't > seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error > if spamc/spa

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

>> http://forum.qmailrocks.org/archive/index.php/t-1623.html >> >> I found the above link when looking for a how to for configuring postfix >> to bounce email BEFORE the initial MTA transaction is complete. I can't >> seem to find one for postfix. I want a sending MTAs to get a 550 error >> if spa

Re: Bounce at SMTPD level

On 12/10/2009 8:09 PM, Marty Anstey wrote: Rejecting messages inline is a far better solution than generating a bounce or simply dropping the message. Most, if not all spam has a forged sender so generating a bounce is a very bad idea. Rejecting inline is much better than dropping message; at le

Sender domain - local user

Hi folks, We are having an email server here running postfix/dovecot using mysql as a backend (virtual user of course).   The problem, or the question we have is, how I can change the @something by default. For example, if a batch job running on the server using userid "daemon" send an emai

Re: Local Mails not working

Mr Rob0, I really take exception to your insulting language. This is a Mailing list where people who do not know can learn a few things from others who know. It is NOT a place to insult and demean people. Meanwhile helping is optional, if you do not wish to help, you could easily ignore the Mail.