Re: Mail to non system account

2009/11/23 tobi > Sam Wootton schrieb: > > 2009/11/22 Magnus Bäck > > > > > >> On Sunday, November 22, 2009 at 17:34 CET, > >> Sam Wootton wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I nearly have Postfix working on Opensuse 11.1. > >>> > >>> For a non system account user, it works. For example: > >>> > >>> /

RE: Milter's not working on Postfix 2.6.5

Solved the problem using setting: milter_protocol = 2 as mentioned in: http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html in 'main.cf' --Ashish Sharma From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Sh

Re: Mail to non system account

On 2009-11-24 Sam Wootton wrote: > 2009/11/23 tobi >> You should not set your domainname in mydestination if you plan to >> receive emails for virtual users on that domain. > > Thanks for that. Is there any reason why? Seems logical to me. It > *is* my destination, why does the type of account

Re: Same address delivering to multiple mailboxes

On 24 Nov 2009, at 00:03, mouss wrote: > Sean Holdsworth a écrit : >> On 21 Nov 2009, at 10:58, mouss wrote: >> >>> Sean Holdsworth a écrit : [snip] If I allow that address rewite then mail for p...@domain or p...@domain will get sent on to the MTA with an envelop

Re: Milter's not working on Postfix 2.6.5

Sharma, Ashish: > Solved the problem using setting: > > milter_protocol = 2 > > as mentioned in: > > http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html > > in 'main.cf' When in doubt, read the release notes file. [Incompat 20090428] The default

Bounce a particular recipient address with specified reject message

Greetings: I have what I expect is a simple question for you guys. Thanks to Ralphs book and the help here I have a many-year stable postfix configuration, love it, don't mess with it. I have a very small hobby-based mailing list I maintain manually in Outlook. Although all maillist messages I s

Re: backscatter

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Noel Jones wrote: > >> On 11/23/2009 3:25 PM, K bharathan wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:02 PM, /dev/rob0 >> > wrote: >>> >>>On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:51:33PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>

Sender ID Milter

Please, correct where I am wrong. Looking at man sid-filter, with -d flag, you can supply domains to be ignored by the filter. I am assuming by domain, it means to the right of @. Does sid-filter ignore entries in the header where reference to the domain is mentioned or the whole email is not f

Don't filter the users

Hi all, I've a Postfix working with Perl-based filter. All works fine, but I don't want filter the legitimate users (who are authenticated using SASL) when they want to do massive mailing using their e-mail client (ThunderBird, Outlook... and so on). I can do it easily hacking the actual Pe

Re: backscatter

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:10:53PM +0200, K bharathan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Michael Orlitzky > wrote: > > Noel Jones wrote: > >> On 11/23/2009 3:25 PM, K bharathan wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:02 PM, /dev/rob0 >>> > wrote: > >>>Indeed, if

Re: Sender ID Milter

On Nov 24, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: Please, correct where I am wrong. Looking at man sid-filter, with -d flag, you can supply domains to be ignored by the filter. I am assuming by domain, it means to the right of @. Does sid-filter ignore entries in the header where reference

Re: Don't filter the users\

Jordi Espasa Clofent: > Hi all, > > I've a Postfix working with Perl-based filter. All works fine, but I > don't want filter the legitimate users (who are authenticated using > SASL) when they want to do massive mailing using their e-mail client > (ThunderBird, Outlook... and so on). That is

Re: Don't filter the users\

That is easy. Have your users connect to the submission port, and let everyone else connnect to the smtp port. Then, specify "=o content_filter=whatever" for the smtp port and not for the submission port. Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean option, but we're a hosting company an

Relay + selective dual authenticity check

Hi to all the list members! I've been thinkering around postfix for some not very long time, but still haven't found an answer to this problem: 1) let there be host "server" and host "client"; 2) server must be able to receive any incoming mail (as usually for its own domain); 3) server only s

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Nov 24, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jordi Espasa Clofent > wrote: That is easy. Have your users connect to the submission port, and let everyone else connnect to the smtp port. Then, specify "=o content_filter=whatever" for the smtp port and not for the submission port. Yes Wietse, I've considere

Re: Relay + selective dual authenticity check

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 05:53:50PM +, K??rlis Repsons wrote: > Hi to all the list members! > > I've been thinkering around postfix for some not very long time, but still > haven't found an answer to this problem: > > 1) let there be host "server" and host "client"; > 2) server must be able

Re: Postfix DKIM

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:08 PM, KLaM Postmaster wrote: > I found the easiest way by far, was to use the DKIM feature of amavisd-new > simple to setup > and work like a charm. > > JLA > I couldn't tell from the docs: http://www.ijs.si/so

Re: Relay + selective dual authenticity check

On Tuesday 24 November 2009 18:39:34 Victor Duchovni wrote: > > 3) server only sends relayed mail to not-on-server address if its from > > authenticated client (with the expected certificate); > > mynetworks = 127.0.0.1 > relay_domains = > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = >

Re: Don't filter the users\

On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: >> That is easy. >> Have your users connect to the submission port > > Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean option, but we're a > hosting company and the costumers are to lazy to understand and accept an > approach like this.

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, LuKreme wrote: On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: That is easy. Have your users connect to the submission port Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean option, but we're a hosting company and the costumers are to lazy to understan

RE: About SMTP Auth with Mysql

Any postfix guy have a knowledge about this issue Really I would like to solve this and debug Actually smtp -v do not show the problem also verbose mode to for sasl Any idea ? -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Vah

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, LuKreme wrote: > > >> On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: >> >> That is easy. Have your users connect to the submission port >>> >>> Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and clean

Re: Don't filter the users

Jordi Espasa Clofent: > > That is easy. > > > > Have your users connect to the submission port, and let everyone > > else connnect to the smtp port. Then, specify "=o content_filter=whatever" > > for the smtp port and not for the submission port. > > Yes Wietse, I've considered this simple and cl

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Michael Saldivar > wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, LuKreme wrote: On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: That is easy. Have your users connect to the submission port Yes Wietse, I've cons

Re: About SMTP Auth with Mysql

* Vahriç Muhtaryan : > Any postfix guy have a knowledge about this issue > Really I would like to solve this and debug > Actually smtp -v do not show the problem also verbose mode to for sasl > Any idea ? It is the Postfix smtpd-daemon and not the smtp-client. If you debug add "-v" to smtpd, not s

Re: Don't filter the users\

On 11/24/2009 3:06 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: If only it were so. Think company that decides caters to thousands (insert a larger number of your liking here to avoid another sarcastic response that misses the point) of users on port 25 and can't one day just STOP accepting all mail on that port, no

Re: Relay + selective dual authenticity check

Ka-rlis Repsons put forth on 11/24/2009 2:00 PM: > Simply put, I just wouldn't like anyone ever to send out mail as myself and > get archived automatically on server as if it was actually me, who sends - > put > on such a barrier was my intention. Well, maybe a bit silly. But doesn't it > allo

Re: Relay + selective dual authenticity check

On Tuesday 24 November 2009 20:00:38 you wrote: > > > 6) before accepting message, server checks clients authenticity in > > > similar way, if user U is the source. > > > > You are trying to impose an end-to-end security model (end-user > > entitlements to send email, ...) onto a hop-by-hop infra

Re: Don't filter the users\

Noel Jones put forth on 11/24/2009 3:37 PM: > OP can probably exploit the fact that end-user mail clients send to an A > record, MTAs send to an MX. > > Set smtp.example.com's A record to some IP that only accepts > authenticated mail, and point the MX to a different IP. > > ... and then plan a

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:48:02 -0700 Michael Saldivar replied: >On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, LuKreme wrote: >> >> >>> On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: >>> >>> That is easy. > Have your users connect to the submiss

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:06:44 -0500 Sahil Tandon replied: >On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Michael Saldivar > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Sahil Tandon >> wrote: >> On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:07 PM, LuKreme wrote: >> >> >> On 24-Nov-2009, at 10:39, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: >> >> T

Re: Don't filter the users\

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Jerry wrote: > Sahil Tandon replied: > >If only it were so. Think company that decides caters to thousands > >(insert a larger number of your liking here to avoid another > >sarcastic response that misses the point) of users on port 25 and > >can't one day just STOP accept

Re: Postfix DKIM

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Michael Saldivar wrote: > I couldn't tell from the docs: > http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/amavisd-new-docs.html#dkim > > Does amavisd-new insert DomainKeys signatures also? or just DKIM? This is the POSTFIX mailing list. Please direct your question to the AMAVISD-NEW ma

Re: Bounce a particular recipient address with specified reject message

On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, techlist06 wrote: > I would like to setup postfix so it has a more friendly reject for > mail sent to (via replys to my messages) "maill...@mydomain.com" with > a particular reject message that instructs the user on what > address(es) to use to better contact me. Something si

valid checkers for POSTFIX/DKIM/DOMAINKEYS

Hi I'm really sorry if it's OT but I'm having problems verifying my setup of postfix/dkim/domainkeys. I've found some dkim/domainkeys online checkers, one told me dkim/domainkeys valid others checkers not. When sending the same test email to Google say it has domainkeys/dkim valid, but yahoo does