hello there,
i am writing a custom filter tool and i am looking
for a way to verify that the recipient address is
valid--as far as postfix and it's aliases and all
it's maps are concerned. probably something like
a command line client for verify(8), or a program
to somehow evaluate that the condi
vecot service)
Oct 26 23:39:03 a1323 postfix/qmgr[32389]: 9143317A5A6: removed
--
Regards
Daniel
>
>
>
> __ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-Version
> 4545 (20091026) __
>
> E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
__ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-Version 4546
(20091027) __
E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Hello,
can a postfix guru please look over my easy configuration? I wanted to create
some very easy antispam defense using only postfix (postgrey).
I created a new smtpd_restriction_classes, which i appended to
smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
my_filtering = check_recipient_access
proxy:pgsql:/e
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Some older versions of postfix give special treatment to the postmaster
> address. To disable this special treatment, add
> # main.cf
> address_verify_sender = $double_bounce_sender
So when you note "older" I am going to assume 2.3.x qualifie
Daniel Spannbauer wrote:
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
>> us...@postfix.org] Im Auftrag von mouss
>> Gesendet: Montag, 26. Oktober 2009 22:28
>> An: 'Postfix users'
>> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: virtual-mailbox-domain: Loops bac
Hey Siju stop spamming all your mailing lists with this crap. Thanks
much.
On Oct 27, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Harakiri wrote:
Hello,
can a postfix guru please look over my easy configuration? I wanted
to create some very easy antispam defense using only postfix
(postgrey).
I created a new smtpd_restriction_classes, which i appended to
smtpd_recipient_restrictions.
On 10/27/2009 7:22 AM, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
Some older versions of postfix give special treatment to the postmaster
address. To disable this special treatment, add
# main.cf
address_verify_sender = $double_bounce_sender
So when you note "
A6:
> > client=fmmailgate03.web.de[217.72.192.234]
> > Oct 26 23:38:58 a1323 postfix/cleanup[24923]: A688917A5A6:
> > message-id=<007301ca568d$1a2f37c0$4e8da7...@de>
> > Oct 26 23:38:58 a1323 postfix/qmgr[32389]: A688917A5A6:
> > from=, size=1362, nrcpt
Hello,
we use smtpd_sender_restrictions on our outgoing smtp gateway to filter
mails from users who are not allowed to send mails to external
recipients. We use the following config:
smtpd_sender_restrictions=check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix-outbound/sender_restrictions, check_sender_access
On log i have the wrong time(-6h) but the date is ok.
I read that i copy /etc/localtime to the chroot of postfix and i try
but don't work...
cp -p /etc/localtime /var/spool/postfix/etc/localtime
and reload postfix don't work...
I use Debian 5.0.3 tzdata and locales is ok and configured.
Thanks,
Ja
Jacopo Cappelli wrote:
> On log i have the wrong time(-6h) but the date is ok.
> I read that i copy /etc/localtime to the chroot of postfix and i try
> but don't work...
> cp -p /etc/localtime /var/spool/postfix/etc/localtime
> and reload postfix don't work...
> I use Debian 5.0.3 tzdata and locale
On 10/27/2009 2:35 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
hello there,
i am writing a custom filter tool and i am looking
for a way to verify that the recipient address is
valid--as far as postfix and it's aliases and all
it's maps are concerned. probably something like
a command line client for verify(8),
Jacopo Cappelli:
> On log i have the wrong time(-6h) but the date is ok.
> I read that i copy /etc/localtime to the chroot of postfix and i try
> but don't work...
Show the evidence. What are the permissions of:
/var/spool/postfix/etc
/var/spool/postfix/etc/localtime
Wietse
server:/etc/postfix# ls -alh /var/spool/postfix/etc/
totale 48K
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4,0K 27 ott 14:40 .
drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4,0K 9 set 11:53 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 312 27 ott 14:40 hosts
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,6K 27 ott 14:40 localtime
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 27 ott 14:40 nssw
Hi ,
I have multiple domains hosted on my postfix server. I am planning to relay
mails for one of the domain test.com to my AS/AV appliance. I tried setting
relayhost = 192.168.180.25 which is IP address of my appliance but it
doesnot relay mails to this IP infact delivers locally: -
Oct 27 18:58
Jacopo Cappelli:
> server:/etc/postfix# ls -alh /var/spool/postfix/etc/
> totale 48K
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4,0K 27 ott 14:40 .
> drwxr-xr-x 20 root root 4,0K 9 set 11:53 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 312 27 ott 14:40 hosts
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2,6K 27 ott 14:40 localtime
> -rw-r--r-- 1 r
Wietse Venema wrote:
Try without SeLinux, AppArmor, and other "security" add-ons.
They are not covered by the Postfix warranty.
Wietse
Postfix has a warranty? :) It's a free product...
--
Dan Schaefer
Web Developer/Systems Analyst
Performance Administration Corp.
Dan Schaefer:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Try without SeLinux, AppArmor, and other "security" add-ons.
> > They are not covered by the Postfix warranty.
> >
> Postfix has a warranty? :) It's a free product...
The warranty that defects will be fixed, for supported releases
(currently, 2.3 and lat
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:51:07AM -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Try without SeLinux, AppArmor, and other "security" add-ons.
>> They are not covered by the Postfix warranty.
>>
>> Wietse
>
> Postfix has a warranty? :) It's a free product...
There is no contractual war
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Dan Schaefer wrote:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Try without SeLinux, AppArmor, and other "security" add-ons.
>> They are not covered by the Postfix warranty.
>>
>>Wietse
>>
>>
> Postfix has a warranty? :) It's a free product...
>
> --
> Dan Schaefer
> Web
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> From: Sahil Tandon
>
> I reject with zen before greylisting.
>
Hi,
thanks for your reply - i had thought about it - but since RBL is an external
service - it takes more time to go through, therefor i used greylisting before
RBL since its a local
Hello All,
I am a newbie for Postfix Mail server. Can anybody please suggest me
on Postfix's default parameter's configuration values. I have one
query relating to the same as,
On my machine I am getting hundreds of default Postfix
configuration parameter values after running the "#p
I have my Postfix configured to require proper DNS resolution in both
directions. However, I have a situation that is giving me problems
perhaps due to multiple PTR records for the IP address. I am getting
the error:
450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname
When I 'dig' the host
On 10/27/2009 10:08 AM, Manoj Burande wrote:
Hello All,
I am a newbie for Postfix Mail server. Can anybody please suggest me
on Postfix's default parameter's configuration values. I have one
query relating to the same as,
On my machine I am getting hundreds of default Postfix
con
Dennis Putnam:
> I have my Postfix configured to require proper DNS resolution in both
> directions. However, I have a situation that is giving me problems
> perhaps due to multiple PTR records for the IP address. I am getting
> the error:
>
> 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostn
Have some software to very selectively store email attachments in Google
Docs repository directly from Postfix using web services API of Google.
Please contact me if interested to test.
Thanks,
Mike Katz
http://mailspect.com
Jacopo Cappelli:
> Only security is grsec but don't block anything of Postfix.
Logging the "wrong time" means one of the following:
1) The timezone file is not accessible (no file, no permission).
Use strace to see what system call fails.
2) The file contains the wrong data. Use cmp(1) to fin
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:28:52PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jacopo Cappelli:
> > Only security is grsec but don't block anything of Postfix.
>
> Logging the "wrong time" means one of the following:
>
> 1) The timezone file is not accessible (no file, no permission).
>Use strace to see w
On 10/27/2009, Dennis Putnam (dennis.put...@aimaudit.com) wrote:
> I have my Postfix configured to require proper DNS resolution in both
> directions. However, I have a situation that is giving me problems
> perhaps due to multiple PTR records for the IP address. I am getting the
> error:
>
> 450
Thanks or the reply. That sucks. Is there a way around this, short of
turning that off or whitelisting?
On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Dennis Putnam:
I have my Postfix configured to require proper DNS resolution in both
directions. However, I have a situation that is givi
On Tuesday, October 27, 2009 at 15:35 CET,
punit jain wrote:
> I have multiple domains hosted on my postfix server. I am planning to
> relay mails for one of the domain test.com to my AS/AV appliance. I
> tried setting relayhost = 192.168.180.25 which is IP address of my
> appliance but it d
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:14:05PM -0400, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> Thanks or the reply. That sucks. Is there a way around this, short of
> turning that off or whitelisting?
Don't use "reject_unknown_client" uncondionally. Use it selectively
in a
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/clien
That is not much different than whitelisting, right? I still have to
maintain a list of permitted networks, do I not?
On Oct 27, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:14:05PM -0400, Dennis Putnam wrote:
Thanks or the reply. That sucks. Is there a way around thi
Hello,
I have the following need:
- Setup a postfix server wich has 2 interfaces
- All emails where the SENDER is @domainA.com is to be sent from interface 1
- All emails where the SENDER is @domainB.com is to be sent from interface 2
- Interface 1 will only receive email which is for domainA.com
On 27-Oct-2009, at 09:00, Harakiri wrote:
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, Sahil Tandon wrote:
From: Sahil Tandon
I reject with zen before greylisting.
Hi,
thanks for your reply - i had thought about it - but since RBL is an
external service - it takes more time to go through,
I dunno about
I hope you realize that the sender (with the cooperation of his ISP)
determines which mail server his outgoing mail goes through. It often isn't
associated with the domain name of his email address.
Having said that, you should have no problem in configuring a single
instance of postfix to support
2009/10/28 Dennis Putnam
> Thanks or the reply. That sucks. Is there a way around this, short of
> turning that off or whitelisting?
Tell the admin of the remote domain to fix their PTR records and/or MX helo
configuration because in the meantime, you're going to have to implement a
dirty hack
Dan Schaefer put forth on 10/27/2009 9:51 AM:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Try without SeLinux, AppArmor, and other "security" add-ons.
>> They are not covered by the Postfix warranty.
>>
>> Wietse
>>
> Postfix has a warranty? :) It's a free product...
Yes, even Wietse has a sense of humor, th
Hello,
Thank you for your quick response.
I apologize if I was not completely clear. I have set up virtual domains and
domain aliasing before, all going through the same interface sharing the
same IP.
In this case, I need domainA.com (thus mail.domainA.com) and domainB.com
(thus mail.domainB.com)
hmm, on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:24:23AM -0500, Noel Jones said that
> Have postfix do recipient validation before your helo checks. That way,
> only valid recipients will be rejected by your other rules.
>
> Usually you can do this by putting reject_unlisted_recipient just after
> permit_mynetwor
On 10/27/2009 8:55 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:24:23AM -0500, Noel Jones said that
Have postfix do recipient validation before your helo checks. That way,
only valid recipients will be rejected by your other rules.
Usually you can do this by putting reject_unliste
42 matches
Mail list logo
