I am trying to implement nodup postfix daemon on my linux (Fedora) box
with no success up2now...
Here shortly described what I've done:
0) I've found some documentation on this page (or on similar pages...):
http://osdir.com/ml/mail.postfix.devel/2007-05/msg00010.html
1) On another intern
Hi,
Am 26.09.2009 04:37 schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> Not without source code changes:
I thought that...
> Why does the address get de-configured? You should be able to bind
> it provided the interface is administratively up, even if it is not
> working.
I've two DSL lines and use RP-PPPoE. The IP
Hi,
Am 26.09.2009 15:04 schrieb Wietse Venema:
>> Is it possible to tell postfix not to send mails if the
>> smtp_bind_address is not available?
> All reasonable TCP/IP stacks will automatically use the right source
> IP address when sending out mail over the dialup link or over the
> local netwo
Sven Strickroth:
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.09.2009 15:04 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >> Is it possible to tell postfix not to send mails if the
> >> smtp_bind_address is not available?
>
> > All reasonable TCP/IP stacks will automatically use the right source
> > IP address when sending out mail over the dial
Trekker101 a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I am new to postfix and I am experiencing a problem sending larger e-
> mails through google mail.
>
>
> Small messages go through without any problem. However, when sending
> mails of more than two or three lines in length I get the following
> message in the
On 9/26/2009 7:24 AM, Gianni Sandigliano wrote:
I am trying to implement nodup postfix daemon on my linux (Fedora) box
with no success up2now...
Not surprising it doesn't work since there is no such software.
The old message you found is proposed documentation for a
non-existent feature on t
Sven Strickroth:
> Hi,
>
> I've a server with multiple ip addresses (all dial-in). But only one
> static ip-address. So if the static ip line is down postfix prints out
> "warning: smtp_connect_addr: bind x.x.x.x: Cannot assign requested
> address" and uses the other (dynamic) ip for sending.
>
>
Am 26.09.2009 16:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> OK, so you send out IP packets with your static IP source address
> out over the dynamic interface.
no, and there's the problem. if the static-ip connection is down,
postfix reports "warning: smtp_connect_addr: bind x.x.x.x: Cannot assign
requested addr
On Sep 26, 2009, at 0:08, Barney Desmond
wrote:
LuKreme: sure, it's easy to describe the generally-expected behaviour,
but I suspect Wietse's point is that you're welcome to write the patch
and make sure nothing breaks. *grin*
Aye, there's the rub.
Hi
I am new to postfix and I am experiencing a problem sending larger e-
mails through google mail.
Small messages go through without any problem. However, when sending
mails of more than two or three lines in length I get the following
message in the log.
Sep 21 20:22:06 server postfix
Is there any way to avoid message duplication after mailing list expansion?
A quick example:
A message is sent:to: al...@mycompany.com
cc: theb...@mycompany.com
Because theboss is included in Alist (and the sender does not know
it...) two copies of the m
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:36:30PM +0200, Sven Strickroth wrote:
> Am 26.09.2009 16:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > OK, so you send out IP packets with your static IP source address
> > out over the dynamic interface.
>
> no, and there's the problem. if the static-ip connection is down,
> postfix r
Erick Calder wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Erick Calder:
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>
>
You can't replace the delimiter. That would break other people's
transit mail, among many things.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand...
Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/26/2009 1:36 PM:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:36:30PM +0200, Sven Strickroth wrote:
>
>> Am 26.09.2009 16:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> OK, so you send out IP packets with your static IP source address
>>> out over the dynamic interface.
>> no, and there's the proble
Stan Hoeppner:
> Victor Duchovni put forth on 9/26/2009 1:36 PM:
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 05:36:30PM +0200, Sven Strickroth wrote:
> >
> >> Am 26.09.2009 16:18 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> >>> OK, so you send out IP packets with your static IP source address
> >>> out over the dynamic interface.
>
so I tried this:
/^([^._\/-]*)[._\/-](.*)@arix\.com$/ ${1}+$...@arix.com
which seemed to work fine, except for the underscores. thinking that
they might be meaningful to the set declaration I tried:
/^e_j...@arix.com$/ e...@arix.com
which also failed... so I'm mystified but I'm happy that
On Sep 26, 2009, at 12:30 PM, mouss wrote:
== virtual_alias_maps:
/^(joe|jim|jane)-(.*)@(example\.net|example\.com)$/$1...@$3
this converts joe-...@example.com to joe+...@example.com
If you don't want to generate the file (and update it when you add
users), you can use mysql or friends.
Erick Calder:
> so I tried this:
>
> /^([^._\/-]*)[._\/-](.*)@arix\.com$/ ${1}+$...@arix.com
Unfortunately, this causes Postfix to accept mail for non-existent
recipients (the virtual alias matches a bogus of username portion,
and Postfix discovers only upon delivery that the address is no
good).
On Sep 26, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Erick Calder:
so I tried this:
/^([^._\/-]*)[._\/-](.*)@arix\.com$/ ${1}+$...@arix.com
Unfortunately, this causes Postfix to accept mail for non-existent
recipients (the virtual alias matches a bogus of username portion,
and Postfix discovers
haha, clearly my regex is borked. I tried replying and got the mail
back with:
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipie
20 matches
Mail list logo
