Postfix+Virtual still not working

2009-09-23 Thread Gerard
FreeBSD-7.2 and Postfix 2.7-20090712 from the FReeBSD ports system. I am still unable to get the 'virtual' delivery system working. I have the following in the main.cf file: virtual_mailbox_domains = seibercom.net virtual_mailbox_base = /var/mail/vhost virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/p

Re: Postfix+Virtual still not working

2009-09-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Gerard: > Sep 23 06:49:23 scorpio postfix/virtual[16417]: 0BEBE22885: > to=, relay=virtual, delay=0.14, > delays=0.12/0.01/0/0.02, dsn=4.2.0, status=deferred (delivery failed to > mailbox /var/mail/vhost/seibercom.net/budman: unable to create lock file > /var/mail/vhost/seibercom.net/budman.loc

Re: Postfix+Virtual still not working

2009-09-23 Thread Gerard
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:05:45 -0400 (EDT) wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > Gerard: > > Sep 23 06:49:23 scorpio postfix/virtual[16417]: 0BEBE22885: > > to=, relay=virtual, delay=0.14, > > delays=0.12/0.01/0/0.02, dsn=4.2.0, status=deferred (delivery > > failed to mailbox /var/mail/vhost

Re: Postfix+Virtual still not working

2009-09-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Gerard: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:05:45 -0400 (EDT) > wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: > > > Gerard: > > > Sep 23 06:49:23 scorpio postfix/virtual[16417]: 0BEBE22885: > > > to=, relay=virtual, delay=0.14, > > > delays=0.12/0.01/0/0.02, dsn=4.2.0, status=deferred (delivery > > > failed to

Re: Postfix+Virtual still not working

2009-09-23 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sep 23, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Gerard wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:05:45 -0400 (EDT) wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: Gerard: Sep 23 06:49:23 scorpio postfix/virtual[16417]: 0BEBE22885: to=, relay=virtual, delay=0.14, delays=0.12/0.01/0/0.02, dsn=4.2.0, status=deferred (delivery fa

Spam Problem

2009-09-23 Thread lucone
Hi All! I receive some spam messages that pass spam filters. Our users see the sender as an internal sender, but the real sender is an external address (see the log entry) There is yet a rule to block sender that use our domain, but doesn't work with these messages I don't know how to block thes

Re: Spam Problem

2009-09-23 Thread Noel Jones
On 9/23/2009 9:44 AM, lucone wrote: Hi All! I receive some spam messages that pass spam filters. Our users see the sender as an internal sender, but the real sender is an external address (see the log entry) There is yet a rule to block sender that use our domain, but doesn't work with these m

how to limit recipients by class of user?

2009-09-23 Thread Xn Nooby
Hello, I am trying to determine the best way to limit who my users can email. I am using a Redhat/Squirrelmail/Dovecot/Postfix configuration. I have 3 categories of users, and each category has a separate "address book" in Squirrelmail, and I need to limit who the user can send mail to the addres

how to limit recipients by class of user?

2009-09-23 Thread Xn Nooby
(sorry if this is posted twice) Hello, I am trying to determine the best way to limit who my users can email. I am using a Redhat/Squirrelmail/Dovecot/Postfix configuration. I have 3 categories of users, and each category has a separate "address book" in Squirrelmail, and I need to limit who the

Re: how to limit recipients by class of user?

2009-09-23 Thread Noel Jones
On 9/23/2009 1:05 PM, Xn Nooby wrote: Hello, I am trying to determine the best way to limit who my users can email. I am using a Redhat/Squirrelmail/Dovecot/Postfix configuration. I have 3 categories of users, and each category has a separate "address book" in Squirrelmail, and I need to limit

Re: how to limit recipients by class of user?

2009-09-23 Thread Noel Jones
On 9/23/2009 1:22 PM, Xn Nooby wrote: (sorry if this is posted twice) Yes, it did. Note that gmail suppresses the "duplicate" list copy, so you won't see your post sent back from the list server. -- Noel Jones

RE: can't get postfix to work with amavisd-new

2009-09-23 Thread Geoff Sweet
Hmmm I have tried to send this a couple times and it keeps bouncing back to me. Not sure why. Sorry if you are getting this multiple times. -Geoff WOW! I upgraded to 2.6.5 and everything just sorta started working. haha I have to admit that I was using 2.3 purely because that is the version ca

EHLO reply use 2 packets

2009-09-23 Thread Reinaldo de Carvalho
Hi, Someone can tell me why EHLO reply send 2 packets? ~# postconf mail_version mail_version = 2.5.5 ## tcpdump ## ^[OM^[OM15:41:23.546763 IP 10.15.10.9.49898 > 10.15.1.65.25: P 1:10(9) ack 34 win 46 e.@.@.M. . ..A`.[TU.s 7J...uLCEHLO myhost.example.com 15:41:23.546924

Re: EHLO reply use 2 packets

2009-09-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Reinaldo de Carvalho: > Hi, > > Someone can tell me why EHLO reply send 2 packets? > > ~# postconf mail_version > mail_version = 2.5.5 > > > ## tcpdump ## > > ^[OM^[OM15:41:23.546763 IP 10.15.10.9.49898 > 10.15.1.65.25: P 1:10(9) > ack 34 win 46 > e.@.@.M. > . > > ..A`.[TU.s

Re: EHLO reply use 2 packets

2009-09-23 Thread Reinaldo de Carvalho
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Reinaldo de Carvalho: >> Hi, >> >> Someone can tell me why EHLO reply send 2 packets? >> >> ~# postconf mail_version >> mail_version = 2.5.5 >> >> >> ## tcpdump ## >> >> ^[OM^[OM15:41:23.546763 IP 10.15.10.9.49898 > 10.15.1.65.25: P 1:10(9)

Re: can't get postfix to work with amavisd-new

2009-09-23 Thread Gerard
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:28:53 -0700 "Geoff Sweet" wrote: > I have to admit that I was using 2.3 purely because that is the > version captured in the repositories for CentOS. But after using the > upgrade from source, it just... works. I am still off a couple > versions for amavisd but the fact t

Re: EHLO reply use 2 packets

2009-09-23 Thread Wietse Venema
Reinaldo de Carvalho: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Reinaldo de Carvalho: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Someone can tell me why EHLO reply send 2 packets? > >> > >> ~# postconf mail_version > >> mail_version = 2.5.5 > >> > >> > >> ## tcpdump ## > >> > >> ^[OM^[OM15:41:23.546763