fake...@fakessh.eu:
> Hi all
> Hi list
>
>
> Following a crash of postfix,
> I posed the following question:
> email for emission
> it takes a field A on the dns server ?
See: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-5.1
Wietse
notes would
be nice.
Thank you very much...
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4440 (20090919) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Sahil,
Thanks for replying, it fixed it.
2009/9/18 Sahil Tandon :
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Fabien Penso wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for having multiple domains, for multiple users, being
>> droped in the same maildirectory.
>>
>> I was using a mysql alias_maps but I guess it's wrong as it is
>> normall
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 03:06:29PM +0200, Martin Allan Jensen wrote:
Hi,
> They would like to make ONE SMTP relay host server so that all their
> customers can use their SMTP server to send mail through.
> The customers already get their incoming mail through their mail servers.
>
> I fail to s
es/domains, so that is not a possibility.
Thank you for your reply.
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4440 (20090919) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Martin Allan Jensen wrote:
> The company I work for have approximately nine mail servers, including
> Postfix, qmail, sendmail and exim. They would like to make ONE SMTP
> relay host server so that all their customers can use their SMTP
> server to send mail through. The cus
nyway thank you for the link, and your opinion.
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4440 (20090919) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
link, or even some rough notes
would be nice.
Thank you very much...
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4440 (20090919) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Q. Why nine email servers
On 2009-09-19 Martin Allan Jensen wrote:
> The company I work for have approximately nine mail servers, including
> Postfix, qmail, sendmail and exim.
> They would like to make ONE SMTP relay host server so that all their
> customers can use their SMTP server to send mail through.
> The customers a
e it a POP/IMAP before SMTP. That
would be secure enough right?
Thank you all for your interest in my problem so far!!
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4440 (20090919) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 A
Martin Allan Jensen wrote:
SASL and VPN would mean that all customers would need a separate account
for their outgoing mail, and that would be a too big project to go ahead
with.
As most of their servers is BlueOnyx it is not really possible to make a
centralized user / password database.
And
take
me years to develop. That's why I am looking for something simpler.
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4440 (20090919) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
a database with a timestamp, and then make it a POP/IMAP before
SMTP. That would be secure enough right?
Thank you all for your interest in my problem so far!!
--
Martin
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4440 (20090919) __
Th
On Sep 19, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Martin Allan Jensen
wrote:
Yes there is - actually there is about six different ones - so
making a system that could talk to all those authentication
mechanisms would take me years to develop. That's why I am looking
for something simpler.
Looking up usern
Martin Allan Jensen wrote:
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
If your customers have POP3/IMAP accounts, there is already a database
of usernames and passwords *somewhere*. Query that.
Yes there is - actually there is about six different ones - so making a
system that could talk to all those authenti
This option :
"I was just thinking about another option. I might be able to make a
small program that analyzes the logfiles for each server, puts it in a
database with a timestamp, and then make it a POP/IMAP before SMTP.
That would be secure enough right?"
Is not valid for doing all you'
Running Postfix (2.7-20090712) on FreeBSD-7.2 system.
This is my first attempt to get virtual users & domains working.
Postfix works fine with regular usrs.
I am receiving this error message in the maillog:
Sep 19 11:10:41 scorpio postfix/virtual[56360]: D5CCE2286D:
to=, relay=virtual, delay=0.
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
Is not valid for doing all you're customers mail machines to connect
to a relayhost, because machines connecting to relay host smtpd server
are not doing any pop against nothing. Take a list of users in all
databases, do a small table in mysql set the primary ke
LuKreme wrote:
Every time I peruse the logs, find his typo, and sent him log lines.
This works for a few days, or weeks, maybe. Then the cycle repeats.
He's old, and essentially untrainable.
You can only lead a horse to the water...
Jos Chrispijn
No matter where they are... do a script that takes users from wherever
they are and dump them to a file... later find differences between the
last file you dumped and from within just dumped then just do
INSERT or UPDATE of those users... it's important not to load
databases... so only
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Gerard wrote:
> Running Postfix (2.7-20090712) on FreeBSD-7.2 system.
>
> This is my first attempt to get virtual users & domains working.
> Postfix works fine with regular usrs.
>
> I am receiving this error message in the maillog:
>
> Sep 19 11:10:41 scorpio postfix/virtu
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:05:44 -0400
Sahil Tandon wrote:
[snip]
> No, but you should compare the ownership of the delivery location with
> what you have specified in $virtual_uid_maps and $virtual_gid_maps.
OK, now I am sort of confused. Postfix never creates any directory
structure. The /var/mai
The error is clear you have to check file directory o file permissions under
your path
Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de Telcel
-Original Message-
From: Gerard
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 11:22:55
To:
Subject: Postfix with virtual users & domains
Running Postfix (2.7-200
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Gerard wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:05:44 -0400 Sahil Tandon
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > No, but you should compare the ownership of the delivery location
> > with what you have specified in $virtual_uid_maps and
> > $virtual_gid_maps.
>
> OK, now I am sort of confused. P
I have this in virtual:
nob...@mydomain.com nobody
@mydomain.com me
Reading the docs I'm led to believe that the first line has precedence and
should catch those emails (I have nobody set in /etc/aliases to /dev/null).
However, emails to nob...@mydomain.com are getting through to account "me".
On 9/19/2009 5:56 PM, Gerry Gam wrote:
I have this in virtual:
nob...@mydomain.com nobody
@mydomain.com me
Reading the docs I'm led to believe that the first line has precedence and should catch
those emails (I have nobody set in /etc/aliases to /dev/null). However, emails to
nob...@mydomain.
"fake...@fakessh.eu" writes:
> Following a crash of postfix,
> I posed the following question:
> email for emission
> it takes a field A on the dns server ?
Yes, you should have A or MX (recommended).
Plus, do not use CNAME. CNAME is evil under email world ..;;
Sincerely,
--
"We have Tom
Jos Chrispijn writes:
> LuKreme wrote:
>> Every time I peruse the logs, find his typo, and sent him log
>> lines. This works for a few days, or weeks, maybe. Then the cycle
>> repeats. He's old, and essentially untrainable.
>
> You can only lead a horse to the water...
Totally i agree to this co
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
>> Postfix VSTREAMs automatically flush output on the next read
>> operation; a lot of things depend on this, including the SMTP client
>> and SMTP server protocol implementations. This is how Postfix avoids
>> sending silly little network packets.
>>
>> In the
On 19-Sep-2009, at 16:56, Gerry Gam wrote:
I have this in virtual:
nob...@mydomain.com nobody
@mydomain.com me
Reading the docs I'm led to believe that the first line has
precedence and should catch those emails (I have nobody set in /etc/
aliases to /dev/null). However, emails to nob...@myd
30 matches
Mail list logo
