Hi,
I'm using a slight variation of the default delay notification
template which includes things like $delay_warning_time_hours and
$maximal_queue_lifetime_days.
A lot of users (ours anyway) won't read past the word "MAILER-DAEMON"
so if it's possible I'd like to be able to make the subject of t
Guy:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using a slight variation of the default delay notification
> template which includes things like $delay_warning_time_hours and
> $maximal_queue_lifetime_days.
>
> A lot of users (ours anyway) won't read past the word "MAILER-DAEMON"
> so if it's possible I'd like to be able to
Hello,
I was wondering, is it possible to change the default error message with
a 550 or 450 ?
It is now : #5.5.0 smtp;550 : Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
Can this be changed ?
Greetings .. Richard Smits
On ons 02 sep 2009 03:28:20 CEST, Sahil Tandon wrote
ppp-124-122-30-5.revip2.asianet.co.th[124.122.30.5]
WHy are you accepting mail from an obvious DHCP address?
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Oh please; just use some common sense and basic heuristic
> It seems Noel was right: you need to learn your basics before moving
forward
> with Postfix. See 'Explanations of Man Sections' here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi
>
> --
> Sahil Tandon
>
There was some error when user, other than root, has been filtering mail.
Error was visible
On 9/2/2009 6:48 AM, indio wrote:
I want to reject all mails sent from *.mydomain.tld, or at least apply
the same
restrictions as to mydomain.tld. I tried some
parent_domain_matches_subdomains,
but wasn't able to make it work.
I want u...@mydomain.tld needed to log in to send mails, and I want
u.
* Richard Smits :
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering, is it possible to change the default error message
> with a 550 or 450 ?
>
> It is now : #5.5.0 smtp;550 : Recipient address
> rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table
>
> Can this be changed ?
Which part of it?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschä
Hello,
After the "rejected" so the "User unknown in virtual alias table" part.
Or the entire message. Also O.K.
Greetings ..
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
I was wondering, is it possible to change the default error message
with a 550 or 450 ?
It is now : #5.5.0 smtp;550
I want to reject all mails sent from *.mydomain.tld, or at least apply the same
restrictions as to mydomain.tld. I tried some parent_domain_matches_subdomains,
but wasn't able to make it work.
I want u...@mydomain.tld needed to log in to send mails, and I want
u...@other.mydomain.tld be treated as
* Richard Smits :
> Hello,
>
> After the "rejected" so the "User unknown in virtual alias table"
> part. Or the entire message. Also O.K.
show_user_unknown_table_name = no
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Fra
Let me explain why I ask this,
We want to include a message in the error message , like :
#5.5.0 smtp;550 : Recipient address
> rejected: Please see http://telephonebook.domain.com for email info
Is this possible ?
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Richard Smits :
Hello,
After the "rejected" so the
* Richard Smits :
> Let me explain why I ask this,
>
> We want to include a message in the error message , like :
>
> #5.5.0 smtp;550 : Recipient address
> > rejected: Please see http://telephonebook.domain.com for email info
>
> Is this possible ?
By editing the sourcecode, yes
--
Ralf Hilde
ok sounds like an alternative, but, in my case, as I told before, most of my
clients are on dialup, so one high res pic attached, let's say 3 MB it's
like about 15 minutes of conection to get the message using POP or IMAP, so,
my idea was letting the user enjoy the picture (silently modified) in
please don't reply off- list
On 1-Sep-2009, at 02:48, nunatarsuaq wrote:
2009/9/1 LuKreme :
On 31-Aug-2009, at 08:07, nunatarsuaq wrote:
Aug 30 11:46:28 ghost postfix/smtpd[26223]: connect from
ppp-124-122-30-5.revip2.asianet.co.th[124.122.30.5]
WHy are you accepting mail from an obvious DHC
On 2-Sep-2009, at 05:00, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 sep 2009 03:28:20 CEST, Sahil Tandon wrote
ppp-124-122-30-5.revip2.asianet.co.th[124.122.30.5]
WHy are you accepting mail from an obvious DHCP address?
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Oh please;
On ons 02 sep 2009 18:07:27 CEST, LuKreme wrote
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Erm don't be naive. If they can't be bothered to have a better
rDNS then I can't be bothered to get their spam.
who is naive now ?, i have seen dynamic ip with a static
I'm a Postfix n00b, so I may be asking a loaded question...but here goes:
Recently, a user of mine sent an email to an incorrect address - he garbled the
domain name. It took six days for our mail server to decide that it was
undeliverable...
Basically, the (incorrect) domain name actually res
On 2-Sep-2009, at 10:22, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 sep 2009 18:07:27 CEST, LuKreme wrote
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Erm don't be naive. If they can't be bothered to have a better
rDNS then I can't be bothered to get their spam.
who is n
Remy Lambert:
> I'm a Postfix n00b, so I may be asking a loaded question...but here goes:
>
> Recently, a user of mine sent an email to an incorrect address -
> he garbled the domain name. It took six days for our mail server
> to decide that it was undeliverable...
[snip]
Indeed, the mail syste
Awesome, this is what I needed - thanks!
I see that what ended up happening in my case is the "bounce_queue_lifetime"
default maximum of 432000 seconds (5 days) was eventually reached. I'll
shorten that up to 3 days for my purposes...if it's something on our side we
can fix it way before then,
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:22 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On ons 02 sep 2009 18:07:27 CEST, LuKreme wrote
> >> who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
> >> it is ?
> > Erm don't be naive. If they can't be bothered to have a better
> > rDNS then I can't be bothered to
Remy Lambert:
> Awesome, this is what I needed - thanks!
>
> I see that what ended up happening in my case is the
> "bounce_queue_lifetime" default maximum of 432000 seconds (5 days)
> was eventually reached. I'll shorten that up to 3 days for my
> purposes...if it's something on our side we can
Oops, you're right - typed the wrong parameter name!
Regarding the error counts, I see what you're getting at - when taking into
consideration how often a message can be retried over any given span of time,
it makes error count pretty irrelevant. I suppose if I want the message to
bounce after
Hi,
It seems when a mail box file gets to about 49MB, postfix will start giving the
error:
"can't create user output file" when trying to send mail to that account.
Is there a setting for this somewhere in postfix? I can't seem to find one in
the main.cf file about it.
I didn't have a problem w
On 9/2/2009 12:43 PM, Postfix wrote:
Hi,
It seems when a mail box file gets to about 49MB, postfix will start
giving the error:
"can't create user output file" when trying to send mail to that account.
Is there a setting for this somewhere in postfix? I can't seem to find
one in the main.cf file
On 9/2/2009, Remy Lambert (rlamb...@healthforcepartners.com) wrote:
> Regarding the error counts, I see what you're getting at - when
> taking into consideration how often a message can be retried over any
> given span of time, it makes error count pretty irrelevant. I
> suppose if I want the mess
On Aug 27, 2009, at 15:02, LuKreme wrote:
On 27-Aug-2009, at 09:58, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote:
I could remove the limitation as you suggest, but doing so would
open me up to hundreds of spams a day.
So you have a choice, you can figure out how else to deal with the
from/to spam, or you can n
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:04:12PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 9/2/2009, Remy Lambert (rlamb...@healthforcepartners.com) wrote:
> > Regarding the error counts, I see what you're getting at - when
> > taking into consideration how often a message can be retried over any
> > given span of time
On ons 02 sep 2009 20:06:08 CEST, Daniel L'Hommedieu wrote
I guess nobody has any ideas on the other problem I mentioned,
because nobody has responded to that half of my original email. :(
are you saying that your wife cant use smtp auth ? :)
--
xpoint
On 9/2/2009, Victor Duchovni (victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com) wrote:
> A bit too soon, given typical grey-listing minimum retry timers. I
> would not send delay notices sooner than an hour after a message has
> been queued. FWIW, I use a 2 hour delay warning.
Hmmm... I just realized why we have
On 2-Sep-2009, at 11:09, Remy Lambert wrote:
I come from the land of MS Exchange so, although I'm competent
I'm not sure one is allowed to use "MS Exchange" and "competent" in
the same sentence without a negation.
Only half kidding :)
--
A marriage is always made up of two people who are p
I have modified the message_size_limit in main.cf and restarted
postfix. If I send messages under the size specified, they are
delivered normally. If the message is over the limit, the message is
not delivered, but there is no entry in the /var/log/maillog that
shows that it was blocked. What am I
I did indeed miss that part, thanks!
Actually, now that I've looked we don't have that configured. I find that
quite odd. I didn't set this system up, but they guy who did I have high
respect for and I'm a little amazed that he didn't configure it.
I'll do so immediately - thanks again for po
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:04:30PM -0700, Christopher Adams wrote:
> I have modified the message_size_limit in main.cf and restarted
> postfix. If I send messages under the size specified, they are
> delivered normally. If the message is over the limit, the message is
> not delivered, but there is
LuKreme:
> On 2-Sep-2009, at 11:09, Remy Lambert wrote:
> > I come from the land of MS Exchange so, although I'm competent
>
> I'm not sure one is allowed to use "MS Exchange" and "competent" in
> the same sentence without a negation.
>
> Only half kidding :)
LuKreme, stick to the technical to
Christopher Adams:
> I have modified the message_size_limit in main.cf and restarted
> postfix. If I send messages under the size specified, they are
> delivered normally. If the message is over the limit, the message is
> not delivered, but there is no entry in the /var/log/maillog that
> shows th
I'm having a bit of an issue I'm hoping someone can help me out with. I've
recently replaced Sendmail with Postfix, and so far so good. I also ran a
script written by Russel Nelson that converts all e-mail located in
/var/spool/mail to a Maildir format. That seemed to work just great. Now,
my i
Thank you for your reply. I did find the bounce that indicates that
the limit had been exceeded. I thought that the logs might also
reflect that it had been blocked.
Another question - can the message that the sender receives be modified?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Victor
Duchovni wrote:
> O
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009, Scott Miller wrote:
> I'm having a bit of an issue I'm hoping someone can help me out with. I've
> recently replaced Sendmail with Postfix, and so far so good. I also ran a
> script written by Russel Nelson that converts all e-mail located in
> /var/spool/mail to a Maildir f
Please do not top-post your replies. Thank you.
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 17:03:20 Christopher Adams wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I did find the bounce that indicates
> that the limit had been exceeded. I thought that the logs might
> also reflect that it had been blocked.
Only if it w
what exactly does "Cannot find your hostname" mean?
NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[216.1.201.141]: 450 4.7.1
Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [216.1.201.141];
from= to=
proto=SMTP helo=
;; ANSWER SECTION:
wellmissionstyle.com. 6402IN A 216.1.20
On 2-Sep-2009, at 16:46, LuKreme wrote:
what exactly does "Cannot find your hostname" mean?
Never mind. Found the answer a few seconds after hitting send.
$ host 216.1.201.141
141.201.1.216.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer unite13.ufot.com.
$ host unite13.ufot.com
Host unite13.ufot.com not
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 17:46:38 LuKreme wrote:
> what exactly does "Cannot find your hostname" mean?
>
> NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[216.1.201.141]: 450 4.7.1
> Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [216.1.201.141];
> from= to=
> proto=SMTP helo=
>
> ;; ANSWER SECT
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> what exactly does "Cannot find your hostname" mean?
>
> NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT from unknown[216.1.201.141]: 450 4.7.1
> Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [216.1.201.141];
> from= to= proto=SMTP
> helo=
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> wellmi
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 15:54 -0600, Scott Miller wrote:
> I'm having a bit of an issue I'm hoping someone can help me out with. I've
> recently replaced Sendmail with Postfix, and so far so good. I also ran a
> script written by Russel Nelson that converts all e-mail located in
> /var/spool/mail
On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
As clearly documented in postconf(5),
How exactly does one get to that man page?
man postconf
That of course works.
man postconf(5)
-bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
man postconf5
No manual entry for postconf5
Does t
On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> As clearly documented in postconf(5),
How exactly does one get to that man page?
man postconf
That of course works.
man postconf(5)
-bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
man postconf5
No manual entry for postconf5
like th
Scott Haneda さんは書きました:
man postconf(5)
-bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
man postconf5
No manual entry for postconf5
Does this imply there are version 1, 2, 3, and 4 as well? How do I
find out?
The number specifies the section, not version.
$ man 5 postconf
$ whereis postconf
pos
On 2-Sep-2009, at 20:40, Scott Haneda wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
As clearly documented in postconf(5),
How exactly does one get to that man page?
man 5 postconf
--
Did they get you to trade your heroes for ghosts? Hot
ashes for trees? Hot air for a cool breeze?
On 2-Sep-2009, at 17:02, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 17:46:38 LuKreme wrote:
The rDNS is wrong, but does reject_unknown_hostname
care about that?
You seem to be confusing several restrictions here.
Actually, I merely typoed. I do not have "reject_unknown_hostname"
smtpd_
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009, Scott Haneda wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2009, at 4:07 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>> As clearly documented in postconf(5),
>
> How exactly does one get to that man page?
> man postconf
> That of course works.
That "works" because, absent a section specification, man(1) will only
displa
51 matches
Mail list logo
