Hi,
I'd like to do a header insert/rewrite on per destination bases. Like if a
message is addressed to @foo.com, I'd like to insert an [X-Foo: header-foo]
and if it's addressed to @bar.com, I'd insert a [X-Foo: header-bar]. Or
rewrite it in case it already exists..
I know about
header_checks =
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:22 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Yeray Gutiérrez Cedrés wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, August 26, 2009 5:49 am, ghe wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've done this by declaring my own internal domain names: slsware.dmz
* Michael Monnerie :
> I just found a good logging example with the nfs server:
> rpc.mountd: Fake hostname ipmi-p4u.zmi.at for 212.69.162.206 - forward
> lookup doesn't exist
> That statement makes it clear, and would be a nice message for postfix
> also.
Didn't Wietse write that code?
--
Ra
Hope someone can help.
*when receiving ...
Aug 28 05:39:13 174 postfix/pickup[9638]: E5547F4BE1: uid=650
from=
Aug 28 05:39:13 174 postfix/cleanup[13001]: E5547F4BE1:
message-id=<002a01ca27c3$5347f090$f9d7d1...@com>
Aug 28 05:39:13 174 postfix/local[13006]: 35E49F4B9B:
to=, orig_to=,
relay=lo
* eric sato :
> Hope someone can help.
>
> *when receiving ...
> Aug 28 05:39:13 174 postfix/pickup[9638]: E5547F4BE1: uid=650
> from=
> Aug 28 05:39:13 174 postfix/cleanup[13001]: E5547F4BE1:
> message-id=<002a01ca27c3$5347f090$f9d7d1...@com>
> Aug 28 05:39:13 174 postfix/local[13006]: 35E49F4B9B
Hi Evgeniy,
> Check where the rewriting is taking place
> (http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html) Then just add a
> -v switch to a corresponding daemon in the master.cf
> (http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#verbose)
Thank you, now I can write a more documented message.
I hav
Michael Monnerie:
> On Donnerstag 27 August 2009 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > And this was logged when a reverse hostname resolved to the wrong IP
> > address:
> >
> > ? ? Aug 26 00:26:12 spike postfix/smtpd[13393]: warning:
> > 61.135.132.106: address not listed for hostname
> > relay2nd.mail.sohu.com
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:10:47PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> -- an example of postmap; I understand that maps first try to find
>with the full address, then with the left part only. Obviously the
>search with the left part is successful.
>
> $ postmap -q sanjeet.ama...@toto.tutu ldap
I have a list of IP/domain combinations that I want to reject. This list is
built from spamassassin AWL. I don't necessarily want to block the entire
domain if I don't have to, just domain IP combinations. So, running creative
queries against AWL, I get a list of domain/IP's.
Is there a way
> I have a list of IP/domain combinations that I want to reject. This
> list is built from spamassassin AWL. I don't necessarily want to block
> the entire domain if I don't have to, just domain IP combinations. So,
> running creative queries against AWL, I get a list of domain/IP's.
>
> Is the
Hello
Using postfix-2.3.3-2.1 + with virtual accounts active directory to make
the search for my users.
I wonder if it is possible to declare more than one ldap server in
postfix, for if it fails then postfix ldap1 continue doing searches on
LDAP2.
failover?
Redundancy?
Thanks
Michel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:48:00AM -0400, Michel Bulgado wrote:
> Using postfix-2.3.3-2.1 + with virtual accounts active directory to make
> the search for my users.
>
> I wonder if it is possible to declare more than one ldap server in
> postfix, for if it fails then postfix ldap1 continue doin
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 10:48 -0400, Michel Bulgado wrote:
> Hello
>
> Using postfix-2.3.3-2.1 + with virtual accounts active directory to make
> the search for my users.
>
> I wonder if it is possible to declare more than one ldap server in
> postfix, for if it fails then postfix ldap1 continue
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:58:56AM -0400, Michel Bulgado wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 10:48 -0400, Michel Bulgado wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Using postfix-2.3.3-2.1 + with virtual accounts active directory to make
> > the search for my users.
> >
> > I wonder if it is possible to declare more
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Jures wrote:
> I'd like to do a header insert/rewrite on per destination bases. Like if a
> message is addressed to @foo.com, I'd like to insert an [X-Foo: header-foo]
> and if it's addressed to @bar.com, I'd insert a [X-Foo: header-bar]. Or
> rewrite it in case it already exi
eric sato a écrit :
> [snip]
> Aug 28 05:39:20 174 postfix/smtp[13024]: E5547F4BE1:
> to=,
> relay=cuda2.time.net.my[203.121.65.119]:25, delay=6.9,
> delays=0.05/0.01/6.6/0.31, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host
> cuda2.time.net.my[203.121.65.119] said: 504 Need Fully Qualified Address
> (in reply to
Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not found"?
>From the log on albatross.python.org:
Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT
from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]: 554 5.0.0
: Helo command rejected: Domain
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not
> found"?
>
> From the log on albatross.python.org:
>
> Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT
> from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]: 554 5.0
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> BTW, this log entry in itself proves that the DNS name must resolved
> back and forth, because otherwise postfix would have logged
> "unknown[76.96.30.96]" instead of
> qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]
> -- which was also the HELO hostname!
mail_version =
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
>
> > BTW, this log entry in itself proves that the DNS name must resolved
> > back and forth, because otherwise postfix would have logged
> > "unknown[76.96.30.96]" instead of
> > qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]
> > -- which was also
For several years I've been using reject_unknown_helo_hostname
as part of a "freemail" restriction class.
I'm using postfix 2.7-20090807 and have seen the note in
HISTORY regarding the 20090808 change to NS and MX lookups
affecting reject_unknown_helo_hostname
Mail from yahoo.com is now reje
On 8/28/2009 5:29 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
BTW, this log entry in itself proves that the DNS name must resolved
back and forth, because otherwise postfix would have logged
"unknown[76.96.30.96]" instead of
qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.3
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not
> > found"?
> >
> > From the log on albatross.python.org:
> >
> > Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warn
Wietse Venema:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not
> > > found"?
> > >
> > > From the log on albatross.python.org:
> > >
> > > Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning:
> > > RC
Hello everybody !!!
I have the following scenario: I plan to configure three SMTP servers
running POSTFIX and I want to point them to one single POP/IMAP server
running DOVECOT.
I know perfectly how to configure POSTIX and DOVECOT together into one
single server. But I need suggestions or tips on
Victor Duchovni ha escrito:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:58:56AM -0400, Michel Bulgado wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 10:48 -0400, Michel Bulgado wrote:
> Hello
>
> Using postfix-2.3.3-2.1 + with virtual accounts active directory to make
> the search for my users.
>
> I wonder if it is possible t
The stable release Postfix 2.6.5 addresses the defects described
below (some already addressed with the not-announced Postfix 2.6.3
release). These defects are also addressed in the legacy releases
that are still maintained: Postfix 2.5.9, 2.4.13 and 2.3.19.
Do not use Postfix 2.6.4, 2.5.8, 2.4.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Klaus Engelmann wrote:
> I have the following scenario: I plan to configure three SMTP servers
> running POSTFIX and I want to point them to one single POP/IMAP server
> running DOVECOT.
>
> I know perfectly how to configure POSTIX and DOVECOT together into one
> single serve
28 matches
Mail list logo
