sender_dependent_relayhost_maps and nullroute

2009-08-15 Thread Ville Walveranta
I'd like to use sender_dependent_relayhost_maps to relay some domains via a remote server while sending mail for others from the local server. However, I also use transport_maps to create a nullroute address (see http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=124639143215455&w=2 for an earlier conversation),

Email size distribution

2009-08-15 Thread Johannes Buchner
Dear mail server admins :-) I am trying to analyse the size distribution of emails, and whether it is Zipf-distributed or if there is a better approximation. I have my own mails obviously, and found a old analysis at [0], but I would like to have a up-to-date and somewhat representative sample.

Re: postfix terminating on signal 15

2009-08-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Jeroen van Aart: > I am pretty sure the babysitter does a few false restarts just because > the system is overloaded and it's not getting a response soon enough. > But without it you'd have an MTA less system for days. It's checking > connectivity on 127.0.0.1:25 with a timeout of 35 seconds, wh

Re: Bcc problem

2009-08-15 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Friday, August 14, 2009 at 15:24 CEST, K bharathan wrote: > mail server is postfix with virtual users and postfix admin for domain > example.com; server fetches mail from an ISP mail server; it works > fine; but if anybody send a Bcc to someb...@example.com it is > immediately sent to po

Re: Forward or BCC only external messages trough MTA

2009-08-15 Thread Magnus Bäck
On Saturday, August 15, 2009 at 00:59 CEST, Jose Perez wrote: > I'm using postfix as MTA in a lot of servers. I usually use aliases to > forward messages from one account to another, or use BCC > (sender_bcc_maps and recipient_bcc_maps) to copy messages to other > accounts. > > A couple of

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

2009-08-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:21:47 -0300, Marcelo Terres wrote: > I know that, and I'm looking for help there too. virtual_overquota_bounce = no why not just this ?, (and why is it even a option in vda patch to use yes ?) if you unlikely have to use yes, make sure sender is NOT forged before the lda

Re: usage of smtpd_recipient_restrictions ; greylisti ng ; verify

2009-08-15 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:40:47 -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> We are reconfiguring our incoming mail server. >> It was working with greylisting enabled ; and we've just added the >> verify (reject_unverified_recipient) capacity. >> >> To avoid email a

Re: Postfix + Vda patch - problems with bounce

2009-08-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Benny Pedersen: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:21:47 -0300, Marcelo Terres > wrote: > > I know that, and I'm looking for help there too. This patch is not a supported part of Postfix. For support please go to the maintainers of the patch. Wietse