Re: Postfix and IDENT (RFC1413)

* Byung-Hee HWANG : > Thanks for good point, Ralf. Then i would like to give you the question > again. How can i make to enable the above IDENT feature with Postfix? There is no such thing. And nobody ever needed that. In 10 years. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk

how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy and implemented in master.cf and main.cf

hi list hi all how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented in master.cf and main.cf "Buddha" peace themselve

SSL_accept error

Hi, I just installed FreeBSD, postfix and dovecot. I tried to do the setup from purplehat.org, but i keep getting the following error, please help. Aug 9 14:22:55 mail02 postfix/smtpd[1969]: SSL_accept error from mail-ew0-f224.google.com[209.85.219.224]: -1 Aug 9 14:22:55 mail02 postfix/smtpd

Re: how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy and implemented in master.cf and main.cf

http://www.google.com http://www.altavista.com/ http://www.bing.com http://www.yahoo.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_search_engine fake...@fakessh.eu wrote: > how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented > in master.cf and main.cf

Re: how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy and implemented in master.cf and main.cf

* fake...@fakessh.eu : > how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented > in master.cf and main.cf Start here: p...@rick -- All technical answers asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public acc

[SOLVED]Re: how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy and implemented in master.cf and main.cf

Le lundi 10 août 2009 17:47, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit : > * fake...@fakessh.eu : > > how to have amavisd-new dkimproxy , and implemented > > in master.cf and main.cf > > Start here: > > > p...@rick google est ton ami "Buddha" peac

Re: report to consolidate allowed messages

Clunk Werclick a écrit : > Hello, > > I have been toying with the best way to produce a report of 'allowed' > messages that have made it all the way through my Postfix. I love the > Postfix logs, they give such detail on failures and refusals and parsing > this is quite straightforward. > > The

Re: report to consolidate allowed messages

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:20:32 +0200, mouss wrote: > Clunk Werclick a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I have been toying with the best way to produce a report of 'allowed' >> messages that have made it all the way through my Postfix. I love the >> Postfix logs, they give such detail on failures and refusal

Re: SSL_accept error

Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed FreeBSD, postfix and dovecot. > > I tried to do the setup from purplehat.org , but > i keep getting the following error, please help. > > Aug 9 14:22:55 mail02 postfix/smtpd[1969]: SSL_accept error from > mail-ew0-f224.googl

Re: SSL_accept error

On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List > wrote: Ebbe Hjorth wrote: Hi, I just installed FreeBSD, postfix and dovecot. I tried to do the setup from purplehat.org , but i keep getting the following error, please help. Aug 9 14:22:55 mail02 postfix/smt

Re: Postfix receives mail for virtual domain on loopback address, but relay access denied on remote connections

jluros a écrit : > I'm making good progress getting postfix up and running, but having a > persistent issue with a domain configured through ISPConfig. My virtual > domain Luros.eu has a catchall address, jlu...@luros.eu which forwards to my > gmail account. When I test through telnet to port 25 lo

Re: Recipient address rewrite at delivery , after content filter

Ovidiu Bivolaru a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > I've Postfix setup as a gateway machine (using content_filter, > relay_domains and transport_maps). I would like to receive messages for > "domain.com", process them with content filter using recipients > @domain.com, then at delivery time convert re

Re: ptr records set to localhost spammers

Robert Schetterer a écrit : > Hi, > some nets have > set their ptr records to localhost > this causes problems to several mailservers > i see no problems at mine but > just asked to clear > > dig -x 123.27.178.4 > > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.5-P1 <<>> -x 123.27.178.4 > ;; global options: printcmd > ;; Got

Re: ptr records set to localhost spammers

"Buddha" peace themselve that he spent the other day with the attack on the ml double bouncing for killer a post on our list, a UBE, I said that I had to send an email with my DK DKIM signatures They spoke on TV in the evening, the newspaper that the attack came from france I do not mention th

Re: lost my Delivered-To: header

I responded to this thread immediately, but it's taken me until now, pestering mail-abuse.com and my isp, to get the IP address of my mailserver off the mail-abuse.com dul database, where it was erroneously dropped. An interesting, if annoying, denial of service. Still hoping that someone

Re: SSL_accept error

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > 2009/8/10 Sahil Tandon > > > On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List < > > grkni...@scent-team.com> wrote: > > > > Ebbe Hjorth wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I just installed FreeBSD, postfix and dovecot. > >>> > >>> I tried to do the

Re: ptr records set to localhost spammers

mouss schrieb: > Robert Schetterer a écrit : >> Hi, >> some nets have >> set their ptr records to localhost >> this causes problems to several mailservers >> i see no problems at mine but >> just asked to clear >> >> dig -x 123.27.178.4 >> >> ; <<>> DiG 9.3.5-P1 <<>> -x 123.27.178.4 >> ;; global op

header_checks usage

Hi all, I have defined header_checks test. Question why it works if I' testing it locally and doesn't work when I do my test via smtp? this is simple definition in/etc/postfix/ /^Received:/IGNORE !/^To: [0-9]+@/ WARN# any message to non-digital accounts should be dropped exampl

Re: header_checks usage

On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, taphy wrote: > I have defined header_checks test. Question why it works if I' testing it > locally and doesn't work when I do my test via smtp? Because your tests are misguided and lead you to the wrong conclusion. > this is simple definition in/etc/postfix/ > /^Received:/

Re: header_checks usage

Hi Sahil, thanks for your reply, it is very much appreciated :) definitely need read manuals more accurate.. (so it is working) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/header_checks-usage-tp24910095p24911219.html Sent from the Postfix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.