Willy De la Court a écrit :
> On Friday 31 July 2009, Tino Donderwinkel wrote:
>> I have a virtual_alias map setup that uses this mySQL query;
>>
>> SELECT rcpt FROM aliases WHERE alias = '%s' OR alias = (SELECT
>> CONCAT('%u@', alias_of) FROM domains WHERE domain = '%d')
>
> hmm I think the way t
Benny Pedersen schrieb:
> On Thu, July 30, 2009 16:50, Rodman Frowert wrote:
>> I wish there was a message board on the Postfix main site instead of JUST
>> the mailing list. Would making find things that are asked a lot quite
>> easier. Some of the mailing list archives don't have search functio
The problems was in here:
http://www.postfix.org/mysql_table.5.html
%u When the input key is an address of the form
u...@domain, %u is replaced by the SQL
quoted local part of the address. Other-
wise, %u
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
limit
Thanks
Ram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 August 2009, Tino Donderwinkel wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 31 July 2009, Tino Donderwinkel wrote:
> > > I have a virtual_alias map setup that uses this mySQL query;
> > >
> > > SELECT rcpt FROM aliases WHERE alias = '%s' OR alias = (SELECT
ram:
> Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
> mails to be transferred during peak hours
>
> Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
> limit
Only via the policy daemon protocol.
Wietse
The postfix documentation regarding reject_sender_login_mismatch:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
or maybe in here:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
Specifically the reject_authenticated_* and reject_unauthenticated_*
forms, would greatly benef
On Saturday 01 August 2009 10:15:08 johnea wrote:
> The postfix documentation regarding reject_sender_login_mismatch:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
> or maybe in here:
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
>
> Specifically the reject_authenticat
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, ram wrote:
> Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
> mails to be transferred during peak hours
>
> Is there a way I can put mail to hold , if size exceeds a particular
> limit
Yes, with a policy service called in smtpd_end_of_data_restrictio
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
> On Saturday 01 August 2009 10:15:08 johnea wrote:
>> The postfix documentation regarding reject_sender_login_mismatch:
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_sender_login_mismatch
>> or maybe in here:
>> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
>>
>> Specif
Below:
* Findings of fact
* Representative messages from syslog
* postconf -n
* Output of tshark -- and if someone wants to complain about the length
of this message, they should consider all the bandwidth wasted by people
who quote entire messages in their replies :-)
Findings of Fact
1. For
Andrew T. Robinson:
> delay=2005, delays=1283/0/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
> delay=5004, delays=4283/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
> delay=7283, delays=6561/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
I these numbers aren't "modified for privacy reasons", Google is
tarpitting you
Magnus Bäck a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> I haven't even heard the term "reverse path" before. Most likely it's
> someone mixing it up with the more common "return path", so you can
> assume they're synonyms.
>
I'm sure you heard it before, but forgot that. it's the term used in RFC
821 (and still used
Matthew D. Fuller a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 03:03:43PM +0100 I heard the voice of
> Clunk Werclick, and lo! it spake thus:
>> My apologies for the terse caveat. As I understand it, there are
>> some external mail services that roaming users may use that forward
>> mail into your Postfix c
Wietse Venema wrote:
Andrew T. Robinson:
delay=2005, delays=1283/0/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=5004, delays=4283/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
delay=7283, delays=6561/0.01/361/361, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred
I these numbers aren't "modified for privacy reasons
greetings,
how can I test local_recipient_maps ?
I am using an ldap local map, and I would like to insert a backup or
failover map. here is what I am using.
local_recipient_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldaplocal $alias_maps
#ldaplocal
server_host = 10.10.1.12
search_base = dc=ldap,dc=mydomain,
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
> i use ldap search all the time for testing but i would like to see how
> postfix queries and replies.
% man 1 postmap
--
Sahil Tandon
On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote:
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Why transfer them at all? Email is a horrible way to send HUGE files.
And grossly inefficient. And rude.
Is there a way I can put mail to hold
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote:
>> Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want the
>> mails to be transferred during peak hours
>
> Why transfer them at all? Email is a horrible way to send HUGE files.
> And grossly inefficient. And
On 1-Aug-2009, at 21:29, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 1-Aug-2009, at 06:18, ram wrote:
Some users on my postfix system send *Huge* mails and I dont want
the
mails to be transferred during peak hours
Why transfer them at all? Email is a horrible way to send HUGE
20 matches
Mail list logo
