Hi,
i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1
After i finished i got several errors that i fixed but im stuck on this:
Jul 31 05:09:49 localhost pop3d: chdir advies4you.nl/admin/: No such
Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
Hi,
i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1
After i finished i got several errors that i fixed but im stuck on this:
Jul 31 05:09:49 localhost pop3d: chdir advies
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1
>
> After i finished i got several errors that i fixed but im stuck on this:
> J
Hi There,
I have a real scenario that I'm not sure how to solve it,
local clients on the same machine that postfix resides : I want
them to be restricted to their particular virtual domains that they
have access to:
This is a sample:
User one (UID/GID 500) : has 2 virtual domains: domain1
Brian,
Do not set relayhost on the edge machine.
unsetting relayhost makes everything work.
thank you!
Akos
Clunk Werclick schreef:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
Hi,
i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1
After i finished i got several errors that i fixed but im
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:40 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
> Clunk Werclick schreef:
> > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
> >> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-c
Please don't top-post...
On 7/30/2009, AMP Admin (ad...@ampprod.com) wrote:
> Sorry. Didn't think about this going to a thread and just hit reply and
> changed the title. haha
Thats exactly what 'hijacking' is, and it isn't funny... haha
> I meant more what is the Nemesis part. What kind of ma
> > I meant more what is the Nemesis part. What kind of mail server is that?
>
> I think most if not all smtp servers can customize the banner to say
> whatever they want, so you can't really tell anything specific/precise
> about a server jujst from the banner it provides.
>
> You'd need to pr
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > I meant more what is the Nemesis part. What kind of mail server is that?
> >
> > I think most if not all smtp servers can customize the banner to say
> > whatever they want, so you can't really tell anything specific/precise
> > about a server jujst from the banner it
On 7/31/2009 8:12 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>> I meant more what is the Nemesis part. What kind of mail server is that?
>> I think most if not all smtp servers can customize the banner to say
>> whatever they want, so you can't really tell anything specific/precise
>> about a server jujst from
k p:
> Hi There,
>
> I have a real scenario that I'm not sure how to solve it,
>
> local clients on the same machine that postfix resides : I want
> them to be restricted to their particular virtual domains that they
> have access to:
>
> This is a sample:
>
> User one (UID/GID 500) :? has
* Charles Marcus :
> Ralf! You got your crystall ball fixed!
*POLISH*
> But seriously... there is nothing stopping anyone else from customizing
> their banner to show the same thing, right?
Indeed.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin
Charles Marcus wrote:
> But seriously... there is nothing stopping anyone else from customizing
> their banner to show the same thing, right?
Sure. You should keep "ESTMP" in your banner - the rest is up to you.
Add
> smtpd_banner = I think ESMTP is a prehistorical protocol
to your main.cd to re
Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
> Clunk Werclick schreef:
>> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
>>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1
>>>
>>>
>>> After i
How does Postfix handle BCCs in terms of visibility? I was checking
whether a 3rd party would be able to access the BCC list if they
received an e-mail with BCC recipients, but was unable to determine
whether:
A) This is dependent upon all mail servers in the chain or only the
e-mail gateway on ou
Paul Cocker wrote:
> How does Postfix handle BCCs in terms of visibility? I was checking
> whether a 3rd party would be able to access the BCC list if they
> received an e-mail with BCC recipients, but was unable to determine
> whether:
>
> A) This is dependent upon all mail servers in the chain or
Hello.
I have two mailboxes (read with pop/imap connection), called us...@domain.tld
and us...@domain.tld. All mails sent to user1 are redirected to user2. To do
this, I have in virtual_alias_maps:
, reading your postconf i would suggest the
> us...@domain.tld us...@domain.tld
> us...@do
I use Postfix 2.4.7.
In other terms, I don't want virtual_alias_maps be read in these two lines:
1
>smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
>content_filter=antispam:dummy
2
>antispam unix - n n - - pipe user=spamd argv=/usr/local/bin/spamc -f
> -e /usr/sbin
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 22:45 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
have seen articles about exporting the Exchange users via LDAP and putting
them in an access map file on the Postfix server, but I am not a big fan of
that. I would prefer to just query the Exchan
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:50 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Clunk Werclick wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 22:45 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> >> Jeff Grossman wrote:
> >
> >>> have seen articles about exporting the Exchange users via LDAP and putting
> >>> them in an access map file on the Postfix serve
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:45:04 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> Jeff Grossman wrote:
>> I am currently running a Gentoo machine with
>> Sendmail/MIMEDefang/Spamassassin/Clamav which acts as a front-end mail
>> server to a couple of different mail servers. The main back-end mail
>> server
>> is an Exchange
Hello.
I find a solution with receive_override_options=no_address_mappings is my
friend ;) All is written here: http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
>smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
> -o receive_override_options=no_address_map
I wasn't aware of that and I was laughing at myself for being an idiot and
making a mistake. I wasn't aware how the system worked. I didn't think to
look at the interworking and thought changing the title would create a new
post. My fault for not researching it before doing that. If it was
inte
Oh, just saw this. Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Ralf Hildebrandt
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 7:13 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: what is ESMTP (Nemesis)
> > I meant more what is t
Hi folks, I have a question for you.
I have a Centos 5.3 with postfix 2.3.3. I'm using Amavisd-new and clamav for
virus checking. My server daily receive lots of messages with JPG files
attached. The number of JPF files in each message is variable.
My question is. When receiving an email with a
On 7/31/2009, AMP Admin (ad...@ampprod.com) wrote:
> telnet only gives 220 smtp.perfora.net (mrus1) Welcome to Nemesis ESMTP
> server oh well. Thanks anyway.
I meant a session where you actually submit mail, and make submissions
that will fail.
You can tell a lot from the error messages...
--
On Friday 31 July 2009 18:16:35 Ing. Davy Leon wrote:
>
> I have a Centos 5.3 with postfix 2.3.3. I'm using Amavisd-new and clamav
> for virus checking. My server daily receive lots of messages with JPG files
> attached. The number of JPF files in each message is variable. My question
> is. When re
A client uses hash files for transport and access on a couple relays. When I
need to make a change to one of these files I typically just edit it and then
do a postmap whatever. On one of the machines it doesn't seem to pickup the
change until I restart postfix (it's an older machine with an o
Jeff Grossman wrote:
3. Do I just set up each domain in a Transport Map file and tell it
which
server to send the mail to?
This step is only necessary if the destination IP differs from
what postfix will find with an MX lookup of the domain.
I am going to use it just in case I screw somethi
Gary Smith wrote:
A client uses hash files for transport and access on a couple relays. When I
need to make a change to one of these files I typically just edit it and then
do a postmap whatever. On one of the machines it doesn't seem to pickup the
change until I restart postfix (it's an old
Thanks Olivier! I'll take a look at that. This server is reserved only for
bounces, notices, newsletters, and policy/competence updates so there's only
a few system accounts on there. :)
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Postfix experts,
I am running Postfix 2.3.3 on a Centos 5.3 system. We are using it as
our primary gateway for relaying email to many of our users at Google (in
the cloud). The problem is that during heavier usage times, many messages
seem to get queued and delayed due to Google's smtp serve
Tim Tyler wrote:
Postfix experts,
I am running Postfix 2.3.3 on a Centos 5.3 system. We are using it
as our primary gateway for relaying email to many of our users at Google
(in the cloud). The problem is that during heavier usage times, many
messages seem to get queued and delayed due
Noel,
I had thought as much. I think the problem with the old box is the filesystem.
It's a RH 3.x series box, with that stupid "hybrid 2.4/2.6" kernel. I justed
wanted to confirm so I can document the process of changes for the client when
I rebuilt the box Sunday.
Gary
PS: Sorry for to
At 11:50 AM 7/31/2009, you wrote:
PS: Sorry for top posting. OWA doesn't have a good way to do it.
Can't you just hit the down arrow or the page down key? :)
On Thu July 30 2009 23:27, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> I only noticed this one because the idiot mail server (or user) on the
> other end was interpreting 5xx as "be a woodpecker and keep trying".
>
this is typical outlook behaviour - endlessly ...
a nice program for people who sell internet traffi
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Evan Platt [e...@espphotography.com]
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 11:55 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: RE: Hash file oddity
At 11:50 AM 7/31/2009, you wrote:
>P
At 12:00 PM 7/31/2009, you wrote:
I guess one could, but then you can't tell where one began and the
other ended ;)
At least they finally added the ability to select "Plain Text" as an
option when sending the emails from OWA.
There should be a append thing (or prepend?) to add a > bracket t
On Jul 30, 2009, at 2:44 PM, dvodvo wrote:
Jul 30 00:59:42 mydomain postfix/trivial-rewrite[13937]: warning: do
not
list domain mydomain.ca in BOTH mydestination and
virtual_alias_domains
Fix this
Jul 30 00:59:44 mydomain postfix/smtp[13941]: 7D04B96117E4:
to=, orig_to=,
relay=gmail-smtp-i
On Jul 30, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Joe wrote:
Seth Mattinen wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On Jul 30, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
The exact byte count of the message+headers is 100793284
Seriously? 96MB emails? I hope that's internal only.
Nope, not internal. Why does that matter?
Probably b
Did anybody ever measure how many clients a Postfix server using Milter can
serve?
Somewhere hidden in my brain I recall someone on the list reporting problems
with Milter under high load. I am wondering how high the load was and if there
was a solution to the problem?
Reason I am asking is: I ne
may be used in
http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:59:47 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
> Did anybody ever measure how many clients a Postfix server using Milter
can
> serve?
>
> Somewhere hidden in my brain I recall someone on the list reporting
> problems
> with Mi
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, The Doctor wrote:
> Get a turkey that seems to be doing a 302 redicrecting
> and using www@ to 'frame' the point.
This means nothing to me. Can you try again?
> Any way of locking down the use of the www to just webforms on the
> local web server?
Yes an access(5) map to R
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Gary Smith wrote:
> A client uses hash files for transport and access on a couple relays. When
> I need to make a change to one of these files I typically just edit it and
> then do a postmap whatever. On one of the machines it doesn't seem to
> pickup the change until I res
When I submit a mail to my Postfix server (using SASL auth over a TLS
connection), Postfix adds the following received header:
Received: from aletheia.cite.lan (33.33.33.333.dynamic.cablesurf.de
[33.33.33.333]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client cer
I have a virtual_alias map setup that uses this mySQL query;
SELECT rcpt FROM aliases WHERE alias = '%s' OR alias = (SELECT CONCAT('%u@',
alias_of) FROM domains WHERE domain = '%d')
Postmap -q @domain.com mysql:/etc/postfix/aliases gives me NO results.
If I change the query to:
SELECT rcpt FROM
Stefan F?rster:
> When I submit a mail to my Postfix server (using SASL auth over a TLS
> connection), Postfix adds the following received header:
>
> Received: from aletheia.cite.lan (33.33.33.333.dynamic.cablesurf.de
> [33.33.33.333]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256
>
* Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stefan Förster:
> > This is working as expected. If I create a new mail and forcibly
> > insert the above header before I submit it, I get a NDR saying that
> > there is a mail forwarding loop for c...@example.net - which is
>
> As documented, Postfix uses Delivered-To: h
On Friday 31 July 2009, Tino Donderwinkel wrote:
> I have a virtual_alias map setup that uses this mySQL query;
>
> SELECT rcpt FROM aliases WHERE alias = '%s' OR alias = (SELECT
> CONCAT('%u@', alias_of) FROM domains WHERE domain = '%d')
hmm I think the way the % vars are replaced is the problem,
On Thu, July 30, 2009 16:50, Rodman Frowert wrote:
> I wish there was a message board on the Postfix main site instead of JUST
> the mailing list. Would making find things that are asked a lot quite
> easier. Some of the mailing list archives don't have search functions...
reject spf softfail,
51 matches
Mail list logo
