Magnus Bäck pisze:
On Monday, July 27, 2009 at 10:56 CEST,
Zbyszek wrote:
I googled everywhere, read how-tos but can not find solution for
simple problem in postfix:
I would like to have such config:
- smtp25/tcp; only server-server communication, only
mail receive for
1) I want to use sasl in order to send mail outside my LAN. The
authentification run well. But I was stopped by zen.spamhaus.org because
my FAI have registered dynamic adresses
in this site.
I don't understand why because permit_sasl_authenticated is always the
second line !!!
2) The sa
On Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 12:11 CEST,
Hervé Hénoch wrote:
> 1) I want to use sasl in order to send mail outside my LAN. The
> authentification run well. But I was stopped by zen.spamhaus.org
> because my FAI have registered dynamic adresses in this site.
Not a problem if permit_sasl_auth
Hi,
I have configured backup mail server for our primary mail server.
i am getting lot of spam with spoofed email ids from our domain.
i noticed in header all these are accepting from backup mail server. primary
mail server discarding spoofed mails.
#postcon -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
On Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 12:54 CEST,
itsramesh_s wrote:
> I have configured backup mail server for our primary mail server.
> i am getting lot of spam with spoofed email ids from our domain.
> i noticed in header all these are accepting from backup mail server.
> primary mail server di
Olivier Nicole:
> Hi,
>
> I read and re-read the address-rewriting readme and coul dnot find any
> indication on the way to rewrite addresses to include GECOS
> information:
>
> o...@cs.ait.ac.th => Olivier Nicole
Display names are the responsibility of the mail user agent.
> Is that possible
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:54 AM, itsramesh_s wrote:
I have configured backup mail server for our primary mail server.
Almost certainly a mistake.
i am getting lot of spam with spoofed email ids from our domain.
That's one reason why.
i noticed in header all these are accepting from backup m
Hallo;
I would like to configure postfix to send whatever is in its queue to whatever
is setup as smarthost, but *NOT* listen for incoming mail; this particular
server is not a mail relay and I do not want to allow it to be an open relay.
Anything I must specifically perform?
Thanks many,
.v
Hi,
> I would like to configure postfix to send whatever is in its queue to
> whatever is setup as smarthost, but *NOT* listen for incoming mail; this
> particular server is not a mail relay and I do not want to allow it to be an
> open relay.
Start by looking here:
http://groups.google.com/gr
Thanks Serge, my needs are different. What I've done so far was the following:
myhostname = nonrelayhost.example.com
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.100.10/32
# Or, this?
# mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, $myhostname
The above might work, but would still require manually masagging the file, I am
> Thanks Serge, my needs are different. What I've done so far was the
> following:
>
> myhostname = nonrelayhost.example.com
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.100.10/32
>
> # Or, this?
> # mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, $myhostname
If you just want to block incoming mails from outside your network
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks Serge, my needs are different. What I've done so far was the following:
myhostname = nonrelayhost.example.com
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.100.10/32
# Or, this?
# mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, $myhostname
The above might work, but would still require manua
> To turn off incoming mail completely, comment out the
> "smtp ... smtpd" service in master.cf.
Wouldn't that completely disable smtp then?
* Serge Fonville :
> > To turn off incoming mail completely, comment out the
> > "smtp ... smtpd" service in master.cf.
>
> Wouldn't that completely disable smtp then?
Incoming, yes.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus B
> * Serge Fonville :
>> > To turn off incoming mail completely, comment out the
>> > "smtp ... smtpd" service in master.cf.
>>
>> Wouldn't that completely disable smtp then?
>
> Incoming, yes.
Perhaps I misunderstood then, but when would a mail be send then if it
can't listen to SMTP requests?
To m
* Serge Fonville :
> > * Serge Fonville :
> >> > To turn off incoming mail completely, comment out the
> >> > "smtp ... smtpd" service in master.cf.
> >>
> >> Wouldn't that completely disable smtp then?
> >
> > Incoming, yes.
> Perhaps I misunderstood then, but when would a mail be send then if it
Thanks all;
Instead of locking down access to smtpd for loopback and local IP address, I've
simply commented out smtpd, but not smtp, it works!
Thanks,
.vp
> From: ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
>
> * Serge Fonville :
>>> * Serge Fonville :
> To turn off incoming mail completely, comment
Does Postfix support/use CRLs? I found some articles like
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0706/0304.html
but I have yet to find something more recnt.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgd
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:18 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
To name one, I tried to get automobile insurance with GEICO, a large
insurer in the USA. If I had access to my old virtual_alias_maps I
could find many more who rejected the "+".
AT&T, Coca Cola, nearly every bank or any site for a company that is
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
I guess I need prohibit the catch all account and offer the solution
with the delimiter instead. That way all spam to bogus email
addresses get rejected because the address does not exist.
That is the best course, yes.
But still I wonde
On Jul 28, 2009, at 2:05 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:18 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
To name one, I tried to get automobile insurance with GEICO, a large
insurer in the USA. If I had access to my old virtual_alias_maps I
could find many more who rejected the "+".
AT&T, Coca Cola, nearl
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> Does Postfix support/use CRLs? I found some articles like
Not according to documentation. If it gets added, then it is up to
the sysadmin to feed up-to-date CRL files to Postfix. It unlikely
that Postfix will reach out over the network whenever a client
connects.
Wiets
On Jul 28, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Some large banks use first_l...@foo.com.
What other sites use doesn't affect me. '-' is problematic because it
is sometimes part of a person's actual name. I chose '_' over '.'
because I had users who already used '.' as a first.last separat
On Tuesday 28 July 2009 05:11:05 Hervé Hénoch wrote:
> 1) I want to use sasl in order to send mail outside my LAN. The
> authentification run well. But I was stopped by zen.spamhaus.org because
> my FAI have registered dynamic adresses
> in this site.
>
> I don't understand why because permit_sasl_
On Monday 27 July 2009 16:57:20 mouss wrote:
> /dev/rob0 a écrit :
> > Unfortunately, I have found that many Web programmers don't bother to
> > read RFC's and find out what characters are allowed in email addresses.
> > Many sites will not accept a "+" in your username. I think the old
> > default
On Sunday 26 July 2009 17:19:39 Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Sunday, July 26, 2009 at 23:58 CEST,
> Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> [...]
>
> > these are my current restrictions:
[...]
> > reject_rhsbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
> > reject_rhsbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
> > reject_rhsbl_client list.dsbl.o
John/SML a écrit :
> [snip]
> cleanup unix n - - - 0 cleanup
mouss said:
> make sure the 5th field is 'n' (and not 'y' nor '-').
then you said:
> I have disbabled chroot in master.cf
Wasn't that a lie?
> [snip]
ghe a écrit :
> On 7/27/09 1:45 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
>> [1] Strictly speaking, it's $smtp_helo_name which should resolve, but
>> the default value for smtp_helo_name is $myhostname, and I would
>> not generally recommend setting smtp_helo_name without good reason.
>
> My MTA is on the
/dev/rob0 a écrit :
> On Monday 27 July 2009 16:57:20 mouss wrote:
>> /dev/rob0 a écrit :
>>> Unfortunately, I have found that many Web programmers don't bother to
>>> read RFC's and find out what characters are allowed in email addresses.
>>> Many sites will not accept a "+" in your username. I th
Hi all!
With the config lines below, all clients from inside my network MUST authenticate
to deliver a message. But all connections from the Internet where "mail from"
is @mydomain.com can deliver mail to local users without authenticate. What should I do
to force authentication to ALL
indio a écrit :
> Hi all!
> With the config lines below, all clients from inside my network MUST
> authenticate to deliver a message. But all connections from the Internet
> where "mail from" is @mydomain.com can deliver mail to local users
> without authenticate. What should I do to force auth
On Jul 28, 2009, at 3:39 PM, mouss wrote:
reported this to my boss, just to hear him saying "I don't want
extensions. I want _real_ addresses".
I used to have an email address (since retired into a spam magnet).
u...@example.com -> All mail was fed to sa-learn --spam and reported
to spamcop
Hi folks i'm trying to figure out a problem with some domains when they send
mails to my server. apparently the problem comes from an invalid header but
i don't know what kind of parameter must change, cause this isn't happens
with all the domains just with some ones.
maybe one of you help me abou
What do these log entries mean and how can I fix this problem:
Jul 29 02:19:39 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/postfix-script[24806]: [ID
197553 mail.info] starting the Postfix mail system
Jul 29 02:19:41 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/master[24807]: [ID 197553
mail.info] daemon started -- version 2
Martijn de Munnik:
> What do these log entries mean and how can I fix this problem:
Read the RELEASE_NOTES.
Wietse
> Jul 29 02:19:39 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/postfix-script[24806]: [ID
> 197553 mail.info] starting the Postfix mail system
> Jul 29 02:19:41 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix
Oscar Cruz:
> Hi folks i'm trying to figure out a problem with some domains when they send
> mails to my server. apparently the problem comes from an invalid header but
> i don't know what kind of parameter must change, cause this isn't happens
> with all the domains just with some ones.
Jul 28 09
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
What do these log entries mean and how can I fix this problem:
Jul 29 02:19:41 stevie.youngguns.nl postfix/tlsmgr[24813]: [ID 947731
mail.warning] warning: request to update table
btree:/var/spool/postfix/smtpd_scache in non-postfix directory
/var/spool/postfix
Jul 29
Thanks for your response. So if i have understood : since
permit_sals_authenticated is before the other lines it implies that sasl
authentication failed ? True ? false ?
It is when I use Outlook Express 6 that I have the problem With
thunderbird it works fine. I have "broken_sasl_auth_cli
On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 08:01 CEST,
Hervé Hénoch wrote:
> Thanks for your response. So if i have understood : since
> permit_sals_authenticated is before the other lines it implies
> that sasl authentication failed ? True ? false ?
There could've been other reasons for the failure to
39 matches
Mail list logo
