Bradley Giesbrecht schrieb:
> How can I offer starttls on port 587 and not port 25?
>
> I've tried moving the tls statements from main.cf to master.cf under 587
> but postfix is still offering tls on port 25.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bradley Giesbrecht
Hi,
what have you tried something like this in maste
Hi
I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail without
a valid MX record. How to do that?
I tried
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_mx_access cidr:/etc/postfix/mxaccess
With a file /etc/postfix/mxaccess having the following contents:
64.94.110/24REJECT Verisi
On Sunday, July 12, 2009 at 11:37 CEST,
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail
> without a valid MX record. How to do that?
Don't do that. MX records are not required, and you will reject
legitimate email. If the MX record isn't present,
Hi
More fooling around with postfix,
Using in main.cf
smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
did not do what I expected:
from the /var/log/mail/info file:
Jul 12 09:12:48 rap postfix/smtpd[6597]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[92.45.179.70]: 450 4.7.1 Client h
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:41:51AM +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Sunday, July 12, 2009 at 11:37 CEST,
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>
> > I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail
> > without a valid MX record. How to do that?
>
> Don't do that. MX records are not requ
2009/7/12 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> from the /var/log/mail/info file:
>
> Jul 12 09:12:48 rap postfix/smtpd[6597]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[92.45.179.70]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
> reverse hostname , [92.45.179.70]; from=
> to= proto=ESMTP helo=
>
> I then used
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:55:36AM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
> 2009/7/12 Keld Jørn Simonsen :
>
> > from the /var/log/mail/info file:
> >
> > Jul 12 09:12:48 rap postfix/smtpd[6597]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > unknown[92.45.179.70]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your
> > reverse
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:34:01 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Bradley Giesbrecht:
> > How can I offer starttls on port 587 and not port 25?
> >
> > I've tried moving the tls statements from main.cf to master.cf
> > under 587 but postfix is still offering tls on port 25.
>
On Sunday, July 12, 2009 at 11:52 CEST,
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:41:51AM +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > Don't do that. MX records are not required, and you will reject
> > legitimate email. If the MX record isn't present, an MTA should
> > use the A record.
>
On Sunday, July 12, 2009 at 12:07 CEST,
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:55:36AM +0200, Ole Tange wrote:
>
> > Notice how you get a 4xx error code. It may simply be your
> > nameserver did not get an answer quickly enough.
Indeed, but 450 is on the other hand the defau
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 12:09:15PM +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Sunday, July 12, 2009 at 11:52 CEST,
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:41:51AM +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> >
> > > Don't do that. MX records are not required, and you will reject
> > > legitimate ema
Magnus Bäck wrote:
Anyway asy70.asy179.tellcom.com.tr is a NXdomain. So maybe postfix
tries to look up the name it got from the PTR.
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname only checks that the PTR
lookups succeeds, it doesn't care about the lookup result like
reject_unknown_client_hostname doe
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail
without a valid MX record. How to do that?
Don't do that. MX records are not required, and you will reject
legitimate email.
That sounds reasonable.
Yes it is understood that the RFCs do not require M
Keld J?rn Simonsen:
> Hi
>
> More fooling around with postfix,
>
> Using in main.cf
>
> smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
>
> did not do what I expected:
>
> from the /var/log/mail/info file:
>
> Jul 12 09:12:48 rap postfix/smtpd[6597]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT f
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 08:15:11AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> > Hi
> >
> > More fooling around with postfix,
> >
> > Using in main.cf
> >
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
> >
> > did not do what I expected:
> >
> > from the /var/lo
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> I updated my ports of mysql to 5.1.35 and of postfix to 2.6.2.
> Everything seems to be working fine, except I get these errors
> occasionally:
>
> postfix/trivial-rewrite[65905]: fatal: proxy:mysql:/usr/local/etc/
> postfix/mysql_virtual_domains_maps.cf(
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, priscilla wrote:
[Please *never* send HTML mail to this list]
> priscilla wrote:
>
> Is it possible to allow a group of unauthenticated senders while other
> senders are authenticated.
>
> Yes, maybe.
>
> How do you intend to identify these senders?
>
> Also clarify
On Sun, July 12, 2009 11:52, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> Yes it is understood that the RFCs do not require MX for mail.
> But how many legitimate mails do not have MX?
stats are stats, show me the logs :)
mx is not a requirement, a will do
reject_unknown_sender_domain will test both imho
--
x
* Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> Hi
>
> I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail without
> a valid MX record. How to do that?
reject_unknown_sender_domain
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Fran
On Jul 12, 2009, at 1:31 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Bradley Giesbrecht schrieb:
How can I offer starttls on port 587 and not port 25?
I've tried moving the tls statements from main.cf to master.cf
under 587
but postfix is still offering tls on port 25.
Thanks,
Bradley Giesbrecht
Hi,
w
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:45:37PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > Hi
> >
> > I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail without
> > a valid MX record. How to do that?
>
> reject_unknown_sender_domain
That does not reject mail, if the A record is
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:45:37PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Keld Jørn Simonsen :
Hi
I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail without
a valid MX record. How to do that?
reject_unknown_sender_domain
Maybe this idea???
%cat mx_access
On Sun, July 12, 2009 11:48, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> 70.179.45.92.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer asy70.asy179.tellcom.com.tr
> And this means that there is a PTR RR.
correct
dig asy70.asy179.tellcom.com.tr
gives the reverse ip ? :) (92.45.179.70)
> Can it be something about postfix not s
On 7/11/2009, Kenneth Stephen (marvin.the.cynical.ro...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm interpreting the "warning: not enough free space in mail queue:
> x bytes" message as postfix telling me that there are x bytes free on
> the filesystem. I can see that this number decreasing between 2AM
> (approx 15MB
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
>
> submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
> -o smtpd_tls=yes
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>
as
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
>>
>> submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
>> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
>> -o smtpd_tls=yes
>> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_ena
On Jul 12, 2009, at 12:11 PM, etor...@dap.es wrote:
as
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
-o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
-o sm
* Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:45:37PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail without
> > > a valid MX record. How to do that?
> >
> > reject_unknown_sender_domain
>
> Th
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Scott Haneda wrote:
system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS
library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL
routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:571:
Debug the proxy. What is it
Just before the fourth of July weekend, Yahoo made some changes with
their mail configuration. At which point my postscript install started
rejecting Yahoo and BTI mail as follows:
# grep B74659480C9: /var/log/maillog
Jul 12 15:09:23 cl-t090-563cl postfix-ak/smtpd[14148]: B74659480C9:
client=web3
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
> Jul 11 05:30:51 rust mail:warn|warning postfix/smtpd[585982]: warning:
> not enough free space in mail queue: 4345856 bytes < 1.5*message size
> limit
> Jul 11 05:30:52 rust mail:warn|warning postfix/smtpd[438490]: warning:
> not enough free space in m
On Jul 11, 2009, at 6:40 PM, Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/7/11 Wietse Venema :
system.log:Jul 10 00:07:57 trex postfix/smtpd[45598]: warning: TLS
library problem: 45598:error:140760FC:SSL
routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:571:
This is openssl's way of saying that the c
Scott Haneda:
> Thanks for the estimation. Comparing a working transaction with one
> that does not work, shows no difference. The one part I need even
> more debug log data, only states "start tls" and then "failure". I
> somehow need to get to the data that happens between those two log
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:14:53PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 05:45:37PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > * Keld Jørn Simonsen :
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I am fooling around with my postfix, and I wanted to reject mail without
> > > >
Chris Babcock wrote:
Just before the fourth of July weekend, Yahoo made some changes with
their mail configuration. At which point my postscript install started
rejecting Yahoo and BTI mail as follows:
# grep B74659480C9: /var/log/maillog
Jul 12 15:09:23 cl-t090-563cl postfix-ak/smtpd[14148]: B7
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
But I would like to try out seeing what effect rejecting mail without a
MX RR wil have. Can I do that in postfix, possibly by specifying
something in the file for check_sender_mx_access . I did google for it.
No, postfix has no built-in function for this. You can use
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Chris Babcock wrote:
> Just before the fourth of July weekend, Yahoo made some changes with
> their mail configuration. At which point my postscript install started
> rejecting Yahoo and BTI mail as follows:
>
> # grep B74659480C9: /var/log/maillog
> Jul 12 15:09:23 cl-t090-5
Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
Anyway: IMHO, a "valid" MX record should be a fully qualified domain
name (FQDN) which would contain at least two characters from the
alphabet [a-z] in the top level domain at the end of the record. So
maybe you
could use a regexp table to check for those:
!/[a-z][a-z]$/
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Is it true that if a PTR was found, then this name would be displayed in
the above log message, and not the IP number?
No, the name will still be "unknown" if the hostname->IP
lookup fails.
Anyway, can you confirm that there is no check on availablilty of the
dom
On Jul 12, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Scott Haneda:
Thanks for the estimation. Comparing a working transaction with one
that does not work, shows no difference. The one part I need even
more debug log data, only states "start tls" and then "failure". I
somehow need to get to the
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 03:20:21PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>>
>> Is it true that if a PTR was found, then this name would be displayed in
>> the above log message, and not the IP number?
>
> No, the name will still be "unknown" if the hostname->IP lookup fails.
OK.
>
>
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
>> But I would like to try out seeing what effect rejecting mail without a
>> MX RR wil have. Can I do that in postfix, possibly by specifying
>> something in the file for check_sender_mx_access . I did google for it.
>
> No, postf
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> >> Anyway if it is a name server timeout, then I think this is always
> >> handled by a 450 response. In my case the mail was rejected.
> >
> > Yes, temporary errors always get a 450 response.
>
> Then I do not understand why the message was reject
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:12:24 -0500
Noel Jones wrote:
> Yes, the message was rejected by your DKIM policy action. The
> postfix default_milter_action only triggers when the milter
> cannot be contacted. If you want to accept mail that fails
> DKIM, see the dkim-filter documentation.
I sent a
Hi,
I have a strange problem getting postfix to work with sasl. I am using Debian
Etch.
I have gotten everyting to work fine on a redhat system.
I installed the sasl2- debian packages.
I have compiled with use_sasl_auth use_cyrus_sasl
I have tried with the dovecot version. (all as shown in
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
>>
>> submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
>> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
>> -o smtpd_tls=yes
>>
Scott Haneda:
> On Jul 12, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Scott Haneda:
> >> Thanks for the estimation. Comparing a working transaction with one
> >> that does not work, shows no difference. The one part I need even
> >> more debug log data, only states "start tls" and then "failur
Robert Schetterer:
> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
> >>
> >> submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
> >> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=
Wietse Venema schrieb:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Victor Duchovni schrieb:
>>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>
Hi, what have you tried something like this in master.cf ?
submission inetn - n - 100 smtpd
-o
* Postfix :
> Hi,
> I have a strange problem getting postfix to work with sasl. I am using Debian
> Etch.
>
> I have gotten everyting to work fine on a redhat system.
>
> I installed the sasl2- debian packages.
>
> I have compiled with use_sasl_auth use_cyrus_sasl
>
> I have tried with the do
On Jul 12, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Sounds like a MySQL (not Postfix) issue; debug there. Are there any
other
type of mysql error lines in the log?
Nope, and the errors are rare. OTOH, I use MySQL almost exclusively
for postfix.
Greetings, all.
I'm having trouble with a forwarded email setup, and I need to munge
an inbound recipient address.
Here's what I have set up: f...@bar.edu is forwarded to o...@rab.net.
bar.edu is running GroupWise as its email server, and GroupWise munges
the recipient address for forwarde
52 matches
Mail list logo
