Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that
* for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch
* And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated
till yesterday there're no probs; suddenly two of my postfix relays not
connecting the exchange2003; i cannot ping or telnet from the relays to
exchange; exchange has got symantec endpoint protection and its firewall;
what could've gone wrong!
Hello,
I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with
milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),
I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host.
I was expecting something something like this:
smtpd_milters = inet:[127.0.0
ram wrote:
Can I implement smtp_sender_login_maps such a way that
* for selective accountids reject_sender_login_mismatch
* And the for the rest Permit any sender id if authenticated
smtp_sender_login_maps works the other way around (it maps MAIL FROM to
SASL login). What you want involve
> Alternatively, the OP could use a transport map to reroute
> stuck messages to
> the error transport and "bounce" them back to the sender
> with an
> informative message.
>
what is this OP you mean?
how can we do this? may be this is what i am exactly looking for...
Any response for this queries is really appreciated!!!
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Truth Seeker wrote:
> From: Truth Seeker
> Subject: Spamassasin in Postfix Server
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 11:54 AM
>
>
> Dear Pros.
>
> The following is my setup
>
>
> H
Truth Seeker schrieb:
>
> Any response for this queries is really appreciated!!!
>
>
> --- On Wed, 6/10/09, Truth Seeker wrote:
>
>> From: Truth Seeker
>> Subject: Spamassasin in Postfix Server
>> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2009, 11:54 AM
>>
>>
>> Dear Pros.
>>
On 6/11/2009 3:12 AM, K bharathan wrote:
> till yesterday there're no probs; suddenly two of my postfix relays not
> connecting the exchange2003; i cannot ping or telnet from the relays to
> exchange; exchange has got symantec endpoint protection and its
> firewall; what could've gone wrong!
Per t
Ihsan Dogan:
>
> Hello,^M
> ^M
> I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with^M
> milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),^M
> I would like that Postfix wold use the second one on the other host.^M
> ^M
> I was expecting something something
Hi all,
local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
Thanks and regards
-stefan-
Thanks - I had seen that online - but made several errors setting it up
(like not setting maxproc to one). having corrected those, I am now
queueing the mail one at a time.
Some strange behaviour however - the wait between deliveries seems to
bear no relation to what I set smtp_connect_timeout to
Hi,
In <5f0a4d43797f50decd8590a59d9e6...@localhost>
"Multiple Milters" on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:27:11 +0200,
Ihsan Dogan wrote:
> I'm running two spamfilters on two machines, which are accessed with
> milter. In case of an error (eg: the first milter service is not running),
> I would like tha
On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said:
> local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand what you mean.
local_recipient_maps specifies lookup tables that Po
Stefan Palme:
> Hi all,
>
> local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
If you don't specify
smtpd_*_restrictions = ... reject_unlisted_recipient ...
(which searches local_recipient_maps, relay_recipient_maps e
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said:
>
> > local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> > anybody tell me which test happens first on incoming emails?
>
> You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand w
Stefan Palme:
[ Charset ISO-8859-15 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus B_ck wrote:
> > On Thu, June 11, 2009 1:03 pm, Stefan Palme said:
> >
> > > local_recipient_maps .vs. smtpd_recipient_restrictions - can
> > > anybody tell me which test happens first on in
On Thu, June 11, 2009 2:13 pm, Stefan Palme said:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:54 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>
> > You're comparing apples and oranges, but I understand what you mean.
> > local_recipient_maps specifies lookup tables that Postfix will consult
> > if the recipient address domain is loc
2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Simon Jones :
>
>> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger?
>
> You COULD use smtp_source
>
> OR
>
> your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using
> telnet.
>
> Keep in mind, though:
> smtpd_client_event_limit_e
2009/6/11 Simon Jones :
> 2009/6/10 Ralf Hildebrandt :
>> * Simon Jones :
>>
>>> This is the part I'm missing, how do I enable the shit flinger?
>>
>> You COULD use smtp_source
>>
>> OR
>>
>> your could set ridiculous low limits (1/60s) and then test it manually using
>> telnet.
>>
>> Keep in mind
i get the logs like the following:
Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/smtp[9353]: 574501614EC: to=,
relay=none, delay=12531, delays=12501/0.28/30/0, d
sn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to 192.168.20.240[192.168.20.240]:
Connection timed out)
Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/error[9652]: 67FE8161520: t
K bharathan wrote:
> i get the logs like the following:
>
> Jun 10 15:18:33 relay1 postfix/smtp[9353]: 574501614EC:
> to=mailto:a...@example.com>>, relay=none,
> delay=12531, delays=12501/0.28/30/0, d
> sn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to 192.168.20.240[192.168.20.240]
> : Connection timed out)
>
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wietse:
> > postconf -d
> >
> > I see mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 v.x.y.z/25 192.168.0.0/24
> >
> > from whence it comes? - I have no mynetworks file.
>
> The command "postconf -d" does NOT show main.cf.
Ok, but still how can it be that postconf -n gives me:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Barney:
> As mouss suggested, your query is unclear. I can think of two interpretations:
> 1. "I've set mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8 in main.cf but for some reason
> machines on my LAN can relay mail out to the internet, how do I stop
> this?"
> 2. "I've set mynetwork
Thank You for Your time and answer, Magnus:
> That's impossible to say based on these log entries. smtpd(8) and
> cleanup(8) do not by default not log accepted recipients.
>
> Please do not trim logs unless asked to do so.
I think I have discerned them - simply by their
from=<>
and unknown to
Hi,
thanks for your fast reply.
@Truth Seeker: I added the message_size_limit statement to the
definition in master.cf as I intended to increase the message size
only for mail sent from my local users and not for all messages.
> > > You can't change the size limit for the SMTP server alone.
>
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:34:15PM +0100, Simon Jones wrote:
> Thanks guys, fail2ban looks great - config is being a bitch though but
> i have anvil working now!
Presumably as an anti-DoS service. It is not an anti-spam feature,
and should not be used that way. The anti-DoS use-case is to prevent
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:08:16PM +0200, Simon Schelkshorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your fast reply.
>
> @Truth Seeker: I added the message_size_limit statement to the
> definition in master.cf as I intended to increase the message size
> only for mail sent from my local users and not for
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:34:15PM +0100, Simon Jones wrote:
>
>> Thanks guys, fail2ban looks great - config is being a bitch though but
>> i have anvil working now!
>
> Presumably as an anti-DoS service. It is not an anti-spam feature,
> and should not be used that way. The anti-DoS use-case is
/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
@bounces.domain.tld bmana...@bounces.domain.tld
Executed:
postmap virtual
postmap -q 'c...@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
postmap -q '@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
bmana...@bounces.domain.tld
Test with
Hi,
This is sort of a two part question. I am running Postfix version 2.2.10
from RedHat. It¹s current for Enterprise Linux 4. Since vendors often use
their own numbering schemes, I don¹t know what Postfix version it really is
in terms of the numbering at postfix.org. Can anyone tell me?
Sec
Rob Tanner:
> Hi,
>
> This is sort of a two part question. I am running Postfix version 2.2.10
> from RedHat. It?s current for Enterprise Linux 4. Since vendors often use
> their own numbering schemes, I don?t know what Postfix version it really is
> in terms of the numbering at postfix.org.
I think a better question that I should have asked, is I need all email for a
domain to go to a single address on that box. We are running Cyrus on the
backend is virtual domain mode so the destination account is
bmana...@bounces.domain.tld. This is a dedicated box just for this email. It
is
Gary Smith wrote:
/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
@bounces.domain.tld bmana...@bounces.domain.tld
Executed:
postmap virtual
postmap -q 'c...@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
postmap -q '@bounces.domain.tld' hash:/etc/postfix/custom/virtual
bmana...@bounces.do
Noel,
Thanks for the follow up (and sorry about the top post). So if I understand
the postconf.5 manual, the recipient_delimiter will strip the bounce- off the
email address and deliver it bou...@bounces.domain.tld as the originating email
address instead of bounce-user=theirdomain@bounce
Gary Smith wrote:
Noel,
Thanks for the follow up (and sorry about the top post). So if I understand
the postconf.5 manual, the recipient_delimiter will strip the bounce- off the
email address and deliver it bou...@bounces.domain.tld as the originating email
address instead of bounce-user=th
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:45:34PM +0700, Sthu Pous wrote:
> Do You know a way how I can track an local application/process that called
> postfix to send a messages (on a hacked system)?
The only thing recorded by Postfix is either the SMTP client source IP
address (and optionally the source port
009/6/10 Truth Seeker :
> now to do flushing for a particular domain, i am trying to configure fast
> flush service. in the documentation i found the following line, which i am
> confused.
>
> could anyone explain this further
>
> As mentioned in the introduction, the mail is delivered by connect
* Rob Tanner :
> Hi,
>
> This is sort of a two part question. I am running Postfix version 2.2.10
> from RedHat. It¹s current for Enterprise Linux 4. Since vendors often use
> their own numbering schemes, I don¹t know what Postfix version it really is
> in terms of the numbering at postfix.org.
Noel,
I created a file /etc/postfix/custom/mydestination and put my entry in there
(hash) and added the following lines to /etc/postfix/main.cf
(only changes made to a stock 2.5.5 config)
mydestination =
$myhostname,localhost.$mydomain,localhost,hash:/etc/postfix/custom/mydestination
Gary Smith wrote:
Noel,
I created a file /etc/postfix/custom/mydestination and put my entry in there
(hash) and added the following lines to /etc/postfix/main.cf
(only changes made to a stock 2.5.5 config)
mydestination =
$myhostname,localhost.$mydomain,localhost,hash:/etc/postfix/
Hello, all -
I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an
alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of
experience with this type of delivery, but not a lot of experience with this
many final recipients.
Right now I see the message sitting in
Bingo... That will teach me to not put my quick changes in the top of the
file...
Thanks,
Gary
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On
Behalf Of Noel Jones [njo...@megan.vbhcs.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:52
dan trainor:
> Hello, all -
>
> I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an
> alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of
> experience with this type of delivery, but not a lot of experience with this
> many final recipients.
>
> Right now
Noel,
Here is what I ended with. I had to add a virtual_alias_maps as the email
address is different the the one we have been sending (and because of the auth
system on this box)
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
hash:/etc/postfix/custom/mydestination
rec
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> dan trainor:
> > Hello, all -
> >
> > I've sent an email through Postfix which has one recipient, which is an
> > alias via alias_maps (mysql lookup table). I've had just a little bit of
> > experience with this type of delivery, but not a
snip ===
It was not obvious how to turn off html, so I selected UTF-8 option for
gmail...hopefully the e-mail(s) will be more readable.
Stripped configuration still yields:
Jun 11 16:34:12 dns1 postfix/master[3308]: reload configuration /etc/postfix
Jun 11 1
Hello all,
Is there any way that i can use 2 content filters? system works for ONE
of the entries below (main.cf).
I have also tried content_filter = scan:127.0.0.1:10025, spamassassin
with no luck (getting mail transport unavailable)
I use clamsmtp for clamav connection.
thanks in advance
B
47 matches
Mail list logo
