Hi
I'm a newbie to Postfix.
My Postfix server is functionnal but the stats (mailgraph) show lot of sent
messages :
example for yesterday :
Received messages : 2818
Sent messages : 2766
I don't think that the users of the mail server sent so many mails
yesterday...
I suppose that I've a pro
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jonathan McMahon wrote:
>
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
>
> My general feedback:
>
> 1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the "google search"
> documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I
> d
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
> to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
> new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
> fault for not respec
Zitat von Rik :
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
fault fo
Thanks it worked :)
Guillaume HILT a écrit :
Hi,
I'm using mailman 2.1.11 on gentoo AMD64.
It's running with postfix, dspam and virtual domains/users (managed by
postfixadmin).
My problem is that all emails sent to a mailing list fall in the catchall.
I'm using a specifig subdomain for the
Hello !
I'm currently migrating my mail server from an old Fedora to an Ubuntu LTS.
My configuration :
Server01 (old Fedora) :
POP3/IMAP/SMTP ports open to Internet
Postfix Server with SASL authentification against local PAM db
Dovecot Server with local mailboxes
Server02 (Ubunti LTS) :
POP3/IM
On May 6, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Rik wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that
the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well
Hi,
I am using Postfix 2.5.5.
I would like to test recipients against a ldap query.
I have 2 mailAlternateAddress attributes for the ldap entry wich mail
attribute is post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr:
# postmap -q post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldapUserAccessTest.cf
OK,OK
Having "OK,
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely rebuilt from a database every five
minutes or so, even if there are no
On May 6, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Philippe Le Gal wrote:
I'm a newbie to Postfix.
My Postfix server is functionnal but the stats (mailgraph) show lot
of sent
messages :
example for yesterday :
Received messages : 2818
Sent messages : 2766
I don't think that the users of the mail server sent so ma
On 5/6/2009, Gaël Lams (lamsg...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_a
On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
>> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
>> time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
>> that the new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the
>> poster's own fault for not respecting h
Thank,
It seems that Mailgraph count local delivery via procmail as "sent message".
I'll check Mailgraph config.
I think that was the problem.
Philippe
Le Wednesday 06 May 2009 12:31:55 Scott Haneda, vous avez écrit :
> On May 6, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Philippe Le Gal wrote:
> > I'm a newbie to Po
Charles Marcus wrote, at 05/06/2009 06:38 AM:
> On 5/6/2009, Gaël Lams (lamsg...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
>> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
>> -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
>> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
These are being generated by Amavis in response to spam email being sent to a
client's network, using their own email addresses as the 'sender'.
How can I stop Amavis from generating these messages?
Michael
On 5/6/2009 8:37 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
>>> I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
>>> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
>>> -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
>>> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>>> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_aut
Charles Marcus wrote, at 05/06/2009 08:48 AM:
> On 5/6/2009 8:37 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
On 5/6/2009 9:03 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
I believe newer versions (I'm on 2.5.6) should be something like:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=per
Charles Marcus wrote, at 05/06/2009 09:38 AM:
> On 5/6/2009 9:03 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> Another minor advantage is that the configuration will continue to work
>> if permit_sasl_authenticated is removed from
>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions in main.cf (if the decision is ever made to
>> disallow
Thanks Jorey for taking the time to elaborate... like I said, I now have
more reading to do... ;)
On 5/6/2009 10:08 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> Understood with respect to main.cf, but we're talking about master.cf. I
>> really thought that it was better to be more specific in master.cf in
>> this
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering perfectly fine
There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
potentially be slowing down pickup. And apparen
Michael wrote:
These are being generated by Amavis in response to spam email being sent to a
client's network, using their own email addresses as the 'sender'.
How can I stop Amavis from generating these messages?
Michael
Sounds as if you've enabled the "warnspamsender" (or maybe the
"warns
Ulrich Zehl wrote:
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely rebuilt from a database every five
minutes or so
Thanks mouss. I removed $mynetworks from relay_domains and added the
domains found in the transport map to relay_domains (while also keeping
them in the transport map). Relaying to those specific domains now works.
However, MX'd machines still suffer "relay access denied." I introduced
"re
Thanks Barney, thanks Noel,
All works fine.
Bye,
rocsva
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Barney Desmond
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:38 AM
> To: postfix users list
> Subject: Re: Redirect messages
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:54:42AM +0200, postfix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Postfix 2.5.5.
>
> I would like to test recipients against a ldap query.
> I have 2 mailAlternateAddress attributes for the ldap entry wich mail
> attribute is post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr:
> # postmap -q post...@spam3
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.5.6 + dovecot + amavis with virtual domains.
The system work fine and users can send and read emails (tnx for the great
documentation).
Now I need to do:
1) prepend "[INFO]" to the subject of all incomming email that have
header "To" equal to "i...@domain.tld"
2) add "B
Alberto Scarpa wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using postfix 2.5.6 + dovecot + amavis with virtual domains.
> The system work fine and users can send and read emails (tnx for the great
> documentation).
>
> Now I need to do:
> 1) prepend "[INFO]" to the subject of all incomming email that have
> header "To"
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 20:53 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Postfix 2.6 will pass the "TLS is active flag". I have changed the
> API so that we no longer need to make code changes in every SASL
> plugin when another attribute is added.
It works with smtps but doesn't work with STARTTLS, because tls_
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 06:52 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
> >> As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
> >> time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
> >> that the new user ends up feeling insulted
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Alberto Scarpa wrote:
>
>> 2) add "Bcc: i...@domain.tld" to all outcomming email that have "[INFO]" in
>> the subject and not "i...@domain.tld" in "To", "CC" or "Bcc" headers
>>
>>
Missed the "outgoing" comment.
Not sure how best to solve this. Postf
Alberto Scarpa wrote:
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.5.6 + dovecot + amavis with virtual domains.
The system work fine and users can send and read emails (tnx for the great
documentation).
Now I need to do:
1) prepend "[INFO]" to the subject of all incomming email that have
header "To" equal to "i.
On Wed May 6 2009 00:44:28 Jonathan McMahon wrote:
> I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
The former is not a problem; Postfix documentation has you covered.
Where you will find (have been finding) difficulty is in the latter.
Postfix documentation does not (and IMO mostly s
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:02:35PM +0200, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
>
> relay_domains =
> hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
> hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
>
> Currently, this table is compl
On Wed May 6 2009 05:02:35 Ulrich Zehl wrote:
> In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like
> so:
>
> relay_domains =
> hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
> hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
>
> Currently, this table is completely rebuilt fro
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:47:37PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> The way it works here is that any fool
> like me can answer a newbie's question, and if we get it wrong, we are
> corrected by the ones who really know.
Let's end the thread here. :-) Hopefully the OP is trying to make sense of
the do
> I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
> mails
>
> On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
> servers are delivering perfectly fine
>
> There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
> potentially be slowing down pickup
> I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
> mails
>
> On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
> servers are delivering perfectly fine
>
> There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
> potentially be slowing down pickup
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:01:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
> I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
> mails
>
> On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
> servers are delivering perfectly fine
>
> There are no body / header checks on thi
Hi,
I am configuring Virtual domains and mailboxes on CentOS 5.5 using
MySQL for data maps and SASL for SMTP Auth. As far as I can say, I have
followed The Book of Postfix.
Dovecot and Postfix both use the same tables for authentication and
POP authentication works perfectly. However an
Hi everyone,
Ok, I have a question...
First, I've never claimed to be smarter than the average amoeba
(although I think possibly I grill a better steak), and I do seem to
recall some time ago someone (mouss, was that you?) saying that the way
I was blocking senders might have unintended consequen
Eric Cunningham a écrit :
> Thanks mouss. I removed $mynetworks from relay_domains and added the
> domains found in the transport map to relay_domains (while also keeping
> them in the transport map). Relaying to those specific domains now works.
>
> However, MX'd machines still suffer "relay a
--On Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:40 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Postfix 2.6 stable release candidate 3 is available. If this has
no problems, then Postfix 2.6.0 will happen soon. The same code is
also available as Postfix 2.7 experimental release 20090428.
Although the download link is cor
Another way,I want the mail server to deliver all the receiveing mails to two
mailBox server(maybe tow pop server).
I found the transport_maps can set the relay host that next hop.
I set it as:
domain1.comrelay:[server1.domian1.com],[server2.domain2.com]
But it failed,How can I do for it?
On 6-May-2009, at 01:29, Rik wrote:
I could not agree more. To the point this is the very *LAST* place I
go
for help.
This should be the last place you go for help. You read the docs, you
google, you research, try and find the answer, and THEN you post here.
I can't tell you how often I'
On Thu, 07 May 2009, Jeff Huang wrote:
> Another way,I want the mail server to deliver all the receiveing mails to
> two mailBox server(maybe tow pop server).
>
> I found the transport_maps can set the relay host that next hop.
>
> I set it as:
>
> domain1.comrelay:[server1.domian1.com],[se
On Wed, 06 May 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I sent him a farewell 'frak off' email directly (yeah, I know, childish
> of me), then smtp rejected anything from his address (using a
> 'check_sender_access' hash with his email address in it (simple reject
> applied, otherwise nothing offensive):
>
Sorry - this was my mistake. The server's arch was 64 and the sasl
expected smtpd.conf in /usr/lib64/sasl2/, not in /usr/lib/sasl2/. Once
I symlinked the two, SASL authenticated correctly.
Thank you for the attention,
Regards
Gurunandan
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 01:28 +0530, Gurunandan R. Bhat w
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:23 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:01:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> > I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
> > mails
> >
> > On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
> > servers are
49 matches
Mail list logo
