On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 08:02:43PM -0300, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>
>> A company have a active directory with sub-domains and when postfix
>> query the main ldap server, if user don't present on this server, its
>> receive referrals for
Greetings,
I am having problems retrieving mail for users in the second virtual
mailbox domain (u...@transco.org.au).
Users from the first virtual mailbox domain (u...@transylvania.org.au)
can send and receive e-mails to/from
any domain.
1. Added the second virtual mailbox domain (transco.
tepertyu wrote:
3. The newly created user can successfully send mail to any domain, and
replies hit the user's mailbox:
Good. Apparently postfix is working correctly.
4. However, if I try to retrieve the mails for mo...@transco.org.au,
nothing is retrieved and the following entry
is creat
Hi,
im testing relay_recipient_maps with ldap. The problem is, what happends when
there is a network issue between the ldap and postfix server? What id like is
when there is an error quering the ldap, that postfix should either only
temporary refuse the message or allow it anyway.
I read abou
Zitat von Harakiri :
Hi,
im testing relay_recipient_maps with ldap. The problem is, what
happends when there is a network issue between the ldap and postfix
server? What id like is when there is an error quering the ldap,
that postfix should either only temporary refuse the message or
--- On Mon, 5/4/09, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> From: lst_ho...@kwsoft.de
> Subject: Re: Generate temporary error for ldap relay_recipient_maps for
> network outages
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Monday, May 4, 2009, 11:36 AM
> Zitat von Harakiri :
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > im tes
What is the effect of the policy_time_limit parameter on an smtpd
policy process? In the readme I see the mentions that the default 100
sec is "too short for a policy daemon that may run for as long as an
SMTP client is connected to an SMTP server process". What does that
mean and what are the im
Postfix gurus,
I am a primary for system X where the mails accounts and messages are split
betweentwo separate complexes. In order for an account to be migrated, I must
stop acceptingthe mail temporarily until it has been migrated to the other
system.
I am using a ldap back-end that containing
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 06:17:16PM +, George Forman wrote:
> I am a primary for system X where the mails accounts and messages
> are split betweentwo separate complexes. In order for an account to be
> migrated, I must stop acceptingthe mail temporarily until it has been
> migrated to the othe
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:24:28AM -0700, Harakiri wrote:
> I didnt see it mentioned in the docs - can you configure this behaviour
> at all?
When table lookups fail, Postfix responds with a 4XX error. This is
not and should not be configurable.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followup
--- On Mon, 5/4/09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> From: Victor Duchovni
> Subject: Re: Generate temporary error for ldap relay_recipient_maps for
> network outages
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Monday, May 4, 2009, 2:38 PM
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:24:28AM -0700, Harakiri wrote:
>
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 01:17:25PM -0700, Harakiri wrote:
> > When table lookups fail, Postfix responds with a 4XX error.
> > This is not and should not be configurable.
>
> "should not be configureable" ? nobody knows everything so nobody
> can claim to say this should not be configureable witho
Brian Mathis a écrit :
> I'm running a relay server for my internal network, and trying to
> construct a smtpd_recipient_restrictions list that will accomplish the
> following:
> - if the client is in mynetworks
> - and it passes a check_policy_service test
> - then allow the message
> - otherwise,
On 4-May-2009, at 14:17, Harakiri wrote:
--- On Mon, 5/4/09, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
From: Victor Duchovni
Subject: Re: Generate temporary error for ldap relay_recipient_maps
for network outages
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Monday, May 4, 2009, 2:38 PM
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:24:2
Hi folks:
Maybe the subject of this message is enough. If I create an access
table using hash format, how fast is Postfix reading entries from it?
I mean, how fast could Postfix read maybe 15000, 2 entries or
more?
Thanks people, bye :)
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:36:52PM -0500, Jose Perez wrote:
> Maybe the subject of this message is enough. If I create an access
> table using hash format, how fast is Postfix reading entries from it?
> I mean, how fast could Postfix read maybe 15000, 2 entries or
> more?
Fast enough.
--
I'm trying to set up an extremely basic mailserver on Leopard 10.5 in order to
check the behavior of some PHP scripts. Nothing fancy needed - I just want to
send and receive mail to/from myself without having to go out to my ISP.
QUESTION #1
I've been able to get Postfix started and can telne
My email timed out and truncated the subject line...
I'm trying to set up an extremely basic mailserver on Leopard 10.5 in order to
check the behavior of some PHP scripts. Nothing fancy needed - I just want to
send and receive mail to/from myself without having to go out to my ISP.
QUESTION
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:32:10PM -0700, Jonathan McMahon wrote:
>
> I'm trying to set up an extremely basic mailserver on Leopard 10.5 in order
> to check the behavior of some PHP scripts. Nothing fancy needed - I just want
> to send and receive mail to/from myself without having to go out to
19 matches
Mail list logo
