Terry Carmen:
> Does anybody know what practical limits are for cidr files?
Postfix CIDR patterns are executed in the specified order. Therefore
the run-time processing time is linear in the number of rules.
Each process also spends some time compiling the patterns during
initialization.
Don't
> Terry Carmen:
>> Does anybody know what practical limits are for cidr files?
>
> Postfix CIDR patterns are executed in the specified order. Therefore
> the run-time processing time is linear in the number of rules.
>
> Each process also spends some time compiling the patterns during
> initializa
at!
I would be grateful if you can help me with this!
Thank you very very much!!!
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4004 (20090413) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Antonis Rizopoulos:
> When I connect to my server, from different networks, to port 25 I am
> able to send emails to local users only without authenticate! It's like
> bypassing Cyrus-SASL.
> I know, of course, that I cannot block access to that port and allow
> only authenticated users to send ema
2009/4/13 Antonis Rizopoulos :
> When I connect to my server, from different networks, to port 25 I am
> able to send emails to local users only without authenticate! It's like
> bypassing Cyrus-SASL.
> I know, of course, that I cannot block access to that port and allow
> only authenticated users
Antonis Rizopoulos wrote, at 04/13/2009 09:55 AM:
> When I connect to my server, from different networks, to port 25 I am
> able to send emails to local users only without authenticate! It's like
> bypassing Cyrus-SASL.
No, in this particular case it is not about you being allowed to *send*
mail,
> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:08:00 -0400
> From: victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Understanding Internet inbound author ldap query behavior
>
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:59:03PM +, Charles Account wrote:
>
>> I am trying to understand the flow o
Charles Account:
> On mail received from the Internet, I'm seeing the following query:Apr 7
>-10:05:07 example postfix/trivial-rewrite[18098]: dict_ldap_lookup: /opt/zimb
>-ra/conf/ldap-transport.cf: Searching with filter (&(|(zimbraMailDeliveryAddr
>-ess=\2A)(zimbraDomainName=\2A))(zimbraMailSta
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 06:33:45PM +, Charles Account wrote:
> Thanks for the information. I am investigating performance issues and
> trying to understand the 'dos and don'ts' of Postfix.
> On mail received from the Internet, I'm seeing the following query:
>
> Apr 7 10:05:07 example postfi
Antonis Rizopoulos a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have a mail server with one virtual domain and some virtual users.
> The configuration of my server is:
> Postfix + Cyrus-SASL + Courier-IMAP + ClamAV + SpamAssassin + Amavis +
> Horde webmail
>
> All of the above works almost perfectly. The users can s
I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my rails
application. My rails application is not able to connect to it. Could this be
because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
also, what configuration would suit me best if I only want to send emails ant
not receive. This is o
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Tashfeen Ekram wrote:
> I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my rails
> application. My rails application is not able to connect to it. Could this
> be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
> also, what configuration would suit me
> I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my rails
application. My rails application is not able to connect to it. Could this
be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
> also, what configuration would suit me best if I only want to send emails
ant not receive. This i
Hi there,
Recently I saw some dumped core files from the qmgr process. According
to the backtrace log, it was qmgr_job_free() complaining about a
"non-zero recipient count" error.
My question are what are the possible reasons that caused this? Is
this something related to configuration? M
Jorey Bump a écrit :
> post...@corwyn.net wrote, at 04/10/2009 12:08 PM:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> I've got a customer who has their Mailer-Daemon address configured to
>> respond with an invalid domain so they get rejected:
>>
>> Apr 9 16:53:44 agencymail postfix/smtpd[1703]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
>>
Darren Pilgrim a écrit :
> I have a setup with postfix MXes handing mail off to postfix backend
> mailbox servers via smtp. I currently have transport_maps returning
> "relay:[fqdn]" where fqdn is the backend server hostname to which mail
> is delivered. I want to change this to individual transp
r...@yingshen.org:
> Hi there,
>
> Recently I saw some dumped core files from the qmgr process. According
> to the backtrace log, it was qmgr_job_free() complaining about a
> "non-zero recipient count" error.
>
> My question are what are the possible reasons that caused this? Is
> this some
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:04:33PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> r...@yingshen.org:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Recently I saw some dumped core files from the qmgr process. According
> > to the backtrace log, it was qmgr_job_free() complaining about a
> > "non-zero recipient count" error.
> >
> >
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 05:04:33PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > r...@yingshen.org:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > Recently I saw some dumped core files from the qmgr process. According
> > > to the backtrace log, it was qmgr_job_free() complaining about a
> > > "non-zero
Tashfeen Ekram wrote:
> I have installed Postfix on Ubuntu to use to only send emails for my
> rails application. My rails application is not able to connect to it.
> Could this be because sendmail is listeneing at port 20?
> also, what configuration would suit me best if I only want to send
> emai
W dniu 2009-04-13 22:46, mouss pisze:
does reject_unknown_sender_domain really reject that many spam (that is
not rejected by zen among other things)?
According to RFC1912:
(...)
2.1 Inconsistent, Missing, or Bad Data
Every Internet-reachable host *should* have a name. The consequences of
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 03:23:11PM -0700, Heath Morrison wrote:
[ Redirected from postfix-devel ]
> I noticed recently the addition of tcp lookup tables in postfix 2.6 so
> decided to play around with it a bit. I setup a little daemon that
> responds to the queries and everything seems to work ni
Looking at options here for eliminating backscatter.
I've reviewed the Howto for this, but it only seems to be effective
against backscatter where one's home domain is forged - not too useful,
IMNSHO, because spammers aren't always going to forge the home domain.
One thing I've been looking a
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Dennis Carr
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2009 12:15 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: A better backscatter killer?
>
> Looking at options here for eliminating b
Dennis Carr wrote:
Looking at options here for eliminating backscatter.
I've reviewed the Howto for this, but it only seems to be effective
against backscatter where one's home domain is forged - not too useful,
IMNSHO, because spammers aren't always going to forge the home domain.
and how
* Dennis Carr :
> Looking at options here for eliminating backscatter.
>
> I've reviewed the Howto for this, but it only seems to be effective
> against backscatter where one's home domain is forged - not too useful,
> IMNSHO, because spammers aren't always going to forge the home domain.
Uhh
* Dennis Carr :
> One thing I've been looking at doing is basically checking headers, and
> if the From: header is null, then reject it immediately.
The From: header is never null, since it has
From: MAILER-DAEMON
in it
> Other approach is to eliminate my 2ary MX from DNS - most of my spam
>
* MacShane, Tracy :
> Then you won't receive some genuine messages, both bounce and
> non-bounce.
>
> Try the ips.backscatterer.org RBL; it works well for us.
>
> http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg57402.html
They are retarded. mail.charite.de is listed in it.
--
R
28 matches
Mail list logo
