Noel Jones wrote:
[...]
There is no bypass mechanism for header_checks.
It whould be nice to have one.
I use cyrus saslauthd with "-r" option to include realms in login.
For smtp-auth configuration, some users put full emailid as username ,
some use just the userid part of email-id(before '@'). Can postfix
always authenticate with userid. Can this be done only for email-ids of
some domain
For
Hello List,
i would like to pimp my postgres setup. To make sure i dont have a slow
hardware, i tested it on three diffrent enviorments:
1.) Native Debian Linux (Dom0)
2.) Debian Linux in Xen (DomU)
3.) Blade with SSD Disk
Here are my results: http://i39.tinypic.com/24azpxg.jpg
Here is my po
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, m...@bortal.de wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> i would like to pimp my postgres setup. To make sure i dont have a slow
> hardware, i tested it on three diffrent enviorments:
Mario,
you might want to subs cribe to postgresql-performance mailing list, at
http://archives.p
2009/3/16 m...@bortal.de :
> Hello List,
>
> i would like to pimp my postgres setup. To make sure i dont have a slow
> hardware, i tested it on three diffrent enviorments:
> 1.) Native Debian Linux (Dom0)
> 2.) Debian Linux in Xen (DomU)
> 3.) Blade with SSD Disk
>
> Here are my results: http://i3
Oh, oops. Sorry! :)
Costin Guşă wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, m...@bortal.de wrote:
Hello List,
i would like to pimp my postgres setup. To make sure i dont have a slow
hardware, i tested it on three diffrent enviorments:
Mario,
you might want to subs cribe to postgresql-p
Henk van Oers:
>
> Noel Jones wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > There is no bypass mechanism for header_checks.
>
> It whould be nice to have one.
Just to clue you in, here is an example SMTP dialog.
220 server.example.com ESMTP
HELO client.example.com
250 server.example.com
MAIL FROM:
I've some problems setting up my postfix server to deliver mails to virtual
users.
As I understand it works that way :
I send an email to my serwer to u...@virtual-domain.com which is redirected
in mysql to user_login.
Problem 1 : postfix tryes to add domain and send mail to :
user_lo...@my_domain.
hi all,
I have a postfix server and I want to restrict some users to send only
to domain I want to allow. I already accomplished the restriction of
who can send to some local users, what I have not is to restrict them
to send outside my domain and allow only to defined external
destination. my con
> Okay, so move those restrictions above permit_mynetworks. When placing
> check_sender_access restrictions above reject_unauth_destination in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions, you must be very careful not to return
> OK in that table since that would make you an open relay. If the
> restriction must
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:29:17PM +0530, ram wrote:
> For smtp-auth configuration, some users put full emailid as username ,
> some use just the userid part of email-id(before '@'). Can postfix
> always authenticate with userid. Can this be done only for email-ids of
> some domain
Postfix passe
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:29:17PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
>> For smtp-auth configuration, some users put full emailid as username ,
>> some use just the userid part of email-id(before '@'). Can postfix
>> always authenticate with userid. Can
Victor Duchovni wrote, at 03/16/2009 10:10 AM:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:29:17PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
>> For smtp-auth configuration, some users put full emailid as username ,
>> some use just the userid part of email-id(before '@'). Can postfix
>> always authenticate with userid. Can this be do
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:19:44AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote, at 03/16/2009 10:10 AM:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:29:17PM +0530, ram wrote:
> >
> >> For smtp-auth configuration, some users put full emailid as username ,
> >> some use just the userid part of email-id(befo
On Monday, March 16, 2009 at 12:36 CET,
Sebastian Chociwski wrote:
> I've some problems setting up my postfix server to deliver mails to
> virtual users.
> As I understand it works that way :
> I send an email to my serwer to u...@virtual-domain.com which is
> redirected in mysql to user_log
On Monday, March 16, 2009 at 14:12 CET,
"M. Rodrigo Monteiro" wrote:
> > Okay, so move those restrictions above permit_mynetworks. When placing
> > check_sender_access restrictions above reject_unauth_destination in
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions, you must be very careful not to return
> >
LuKreme a écrit :
> [snip]
> Figured that out right after sending last. Everything works in postfix
> right now as it is. I am only able to auth against the salsdb with
>
> $ cat smtpd.conf
> pwcheck_method: auxprop
> mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN
>
> Any changes I've tried to make to that file so fa
> Place check_sender_access in smtpd_sender_retrictions, probably
> before permit_mynetworks unless you want to exempt local clients
> from the checks. As long as smtpd_delay_reject = yes you can place
> check_recipient_access in the same place, otherwise you need to keep
> them in smtpd_recipient_
On Monday, March 16, 2009 at 20:53 CET,
"M. Rodrigo Monteiro" wrote:
> > Place check_sender_access in smtpd_sender_retrictions, probably
> > before permit_mynetworks unless you want to exempt local clients
> > from the checks. As long as smtpd_delay_reject = yes you can place
> > check_recip
Summary: Some Gentoo systems have 2 (related) CA certs in one of the
files in the standard root CA bundle, one of the CAs is listed separately
in another file. This leads to problems where the same trusted root is
loaded twice.
Working with a poster to the OpenSSL-users list, this was resolved to
(already sent this, but had a problem on the first attempt, am not
sure If I sent it successfully)
I have a postfix server and I want to restrict some users to send only
to domain I want to allow. I already accomplished the restriction of
who can send to some local users, what I have not is to
(already sent this, but had a problem on the first attempt, am not
sure If I sent it successfully)
I have a postfix server and I want to restrict some users to send only
to domain I want to allow. I already accomplished the restriction of
who can send to some local users, what I have not is to
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Henk van Oers:
Noel Jones wrote:
[...]
There is no bypass mechanism for header_checks.
It whould be nice to have one.
Just to clue you in, here is an example SMTP dialog.
220 server.example.com ESMTP
HELO client.example.com
250 server
Hello,
Is there a way (without recompiling) to increase maximal_queue_lifetime beyond
20 days? I've tried several settings, but none seem to work. I get this message
in /var/log/maillog, but I can't set the param that high:
postfix/qmgr[4176]: fatal: invalid maximal_queue_lifetime: 1296 (max
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Post Freak wrote:
> Is there a way (without recompiling) to increase maximal_queue_lifetime
> beyond 20 days? I've tried several settings, but none seem to work. I get
> this message in /var/log/maillog, but I can't set the param that high:
Yes, you can set maximal_queue_life
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, aio shin wrote:
> (already sent this, but had a problem on the first attempt, am not
> sure If I sent it successfully)
This is the third time you've sent the same email to this mailing list. If
you suspect delivery failures, do not just re-send your message; instead,
check t
Henk van Oers:
> I think OK can be used to skip not only the rest of the expressions
> but also the rest of the header lines.
Sorry, that would break compatibility. Postfix is used for
serious work, not jusr toy systems.
Wietse
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Henk van Oers:
I think OK can be used to skip not only the rest of the expressions
but also the rest of the header lines.
Sorry, that would break compatibility. Postfix is used for
serious work, not jusr toy systems.
Fine, not Ok than.
What abou
Henk van Oers:
> I think OK can be used to skip not only the rest of the expressions
> but also the rest of the header lines.
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Sorry, that would break compatibility. Postfix is used for
> serious work, not jusr toy systems.
Henk van Oers:
> Fine, not Ok
On 3/17/09, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, aio shin wrote:
>
>> (already sent this, but had a problem on the first attempt, am not
>> sure If I sent it successfully)
>
> This is the third time you've sent the same email to this mailing list. If
> you suspect delivery failures, do not
Thank you for your answer...
You were right, I actually have commented that line
(smtpd_client_restrictions) when I did the tests. So, that is why it
allowed me.
Thank you.. I still have 1 more question, but I will write other mail for that.
Cheers...
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Magnus Bäc
Hello!
A quick question (I think).
According to the Postfix Manual, "reject_unlisted_recipient":
> "Reject the request when the MAIL FROM address is not listed in the list of
> valid recipients for its domain class."
>
and "smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender":
> "Request that the Postfix SMTP server
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Alberto Lepe
> Sent: Monday, 16 March 2009 4:18 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Too strict?
>
> Hello, and thank you in advance for your time!
>
> I have
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Wietse Venema wrote:
Headers that you want to reject may appear before or
after headers that you want to whitelist.
Now i see, thank you.
I will write a header proxy that only collects the
headers, does some expressions with shortcuts
and starts streaming the 20+MB body
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Alberto Lepe wrote:
> According to the Postfix Manual, "reject_unlisted_recipient":
>
> > "Reject the request when the MAIL FROM address is not listed in the list of
> > valid recipients for its domain class."
No, reject_unlisted_recipient has nothing to do with the MAIL FRO
Ok, that makes sense... I have so many windows opened that i didn't
rechecked what I was reading... sorry for that.
Have a nice day.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>
> > According to the Postfix Manual, "reject_unlisted_recipient
Ok, I checked the references... so let me correct my question:
"reject_unlisted_recipient" was indeed "reject_unlisted_sender".
So, If I use that rule, and someone is trying to send a mail to a
local account from for example hotmail, gmail, or any other external
server,
means that it will be
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Alberto Lepe wrote:
[Please stop top-posting!]
> Ok, I checked the references... so let me correct my question:
>
> "reject_unlisted_recipient" was indeed "reject_unlisted_sender".
>
> So, If I use that rule, and someone is trying to send a mail to a
> local account from
Sorry but what do you mean by "top-posting"? I'm just replying to the
mail... ??
I'm sorry if I'm bothering someone with that... how it is the "normal" way
to answer then?
I know that hotmail, gmail, etc. should NOT be listed in
$mydestination...etc...
So if I understood (sorry my English is not p
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Alberto Lepe wrote:
> Sorry but what do you mean by "top-posting"? I'm just replying to the
> mail... ??
> I'm sorry if I'm bothering someone with that... how it is the "normal" way
> to answer then?
Top-posting makes it difficult for others to follow the thread in its
logica
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:45:17 +0900, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>Sorry but what do you mean by "top-posting"? I'm just replying to the mail...
>??
>I'm sorry if I'm bothering someone with that... how it is the "normal" way to
>answer then?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:45:17 +0900, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>
> >Sorry but what do you mean by "top-posting"? I'm just replying to the
> mail... ??
> >I'm sorry if I'm bothering someone with that... how it is the "normal" way
> to answer then?
I'm looking to move the postfix directory from /var/spool/postfix to another
array. When I specify the setting in main.cf as:
queue_directory = /opt/postfix
I reload and postfix will no longer send mail. All the subfolders are created
underneath the /opt/postfix directory with the proper perm
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Brandon Hilkert wrote:
> I'm looking to move the postfix directory from /var/spool/postfix to
> another array. When I specify the setting in main.cf as:
>
> queue_directory = /opt/postfix
Did you stop Postfix before making this change to main.cf? In your
follow-up, includ
Someday (maybe today) I will WRITE DOWN the proper way to generate and export
certificates. Getting this warning in my maillog:
"warning: cannot get private key from file /etc/postfix/privkey.pem"
Doesn't stop TLS from occurring, it is just annoying. TLS is used between
postfix mail gateways
2009/3/17 Security Admin (NetSec) :
> Someday (maybe today) I will WRITE DOWN the proper way to generate and export
> certificates. Getting this warning in my maillog:
>
> "warning: cannot get private key from file /etc/postfix/privkey.pem"
>
> Doesn't stop TLS from occurring, it is just annoying
46 matches
Mail list logo
