I Have fixed the problem, its firewall issue in NATing.
Regards,
Ramesh.
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, "itsramesh_s" wrote:
>
> Sahil,
>
> I have rechecked my configuration and googled for any root cause for
> this failure, i didn't find any clue.
>
> Before configuring SMTP-AUTH, i know mail
Hi,
i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over postfix
servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
check? Maybe a whitelist for this setting or add the domain in the /etc/ho
Harakiri:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over
> postfix servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
>
> Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
> check? Maybe a whitelist for this setting or add
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 04:05 -0800, Harakiri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have one specific sender domain which should be allowed to sent over
> postfix servers, however this domain is not registered as MX or DNS.
>
> Is there a way to exclude this domain from the reject_unknown_sender_domain
> check? Ma
--- On Thu, 2/26/09, Wietse Venema wrote:
> From: Wietse Venema
> Subject: Re: exclude one domain from reject_unknown_sender_domain
> Why do people expect that OTHER mail servers will not
> reject
> mail with a bogus sender domain?
i dont expect it, i have control over the internal mail so
When I check my Postfix mail queue, I am always noticing a strange
entry that sits there until I manually remove it. I really don't
understand why it is even routed into my Postfix server to begin with
as the recipient and domain don't match anything my server handles.
The senders address looks to
Carlos Williams:
> -Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
> 283B71FA4CFB 5734 Wed Feb 25 14:40:28 ztul.f...@thestampcatalogue.com
> (connect to vmx.atpco.com[206.181.245.168]:25: Connection timed out)
> christine.a.e
Hi guys,
I'm chasing my tail on this one. The setup is pretty simple virtual
hosting, with virtual_alias_maps in a file 'virtuals' which works fine,
except for one line:
b...@example.com bob, john, dave
When sending a mail to b...@example.com, bob receives one copy of the
mail, but j
Look for receive_override_options in the MASTER.CF file
examples of the FILTER_README documentation.
Wietse
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:03:24PM +0100, Manuel P??gouri??-Gonnard wrote:
> Hmm, isn't it twice the same paragrah (or two versions of it)?
>
> May I suggest to update the description of smtpd_tls_CA_file
>
> By the way, I'm not sure still whether I understand correctly smptd_CA_path.
> Would the
>I have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my > internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email > account and he wants to sent mail by my server trhough the smtps.> I have seen that with postfix is possible to use two different smtp > but is possible to use a smt
Please excuse me if this has been discussed before,
i tried searching the archives and the documentation
and google and the info seems a bit dated and incomplete
and for exchange 5.5.
We have an exchange server 2003 (not sbs) at our office and several pop
accounts which we pop for email to be deli
Please post in plain text, not HTML.
--
Magnus Bäck
mag...@dsek.lth.se
At 08:53 AM 2/26/2009, kj wrote:
When sending a mail to b...@example.com, bob receives one copy of the
mail, but john and dave each receives two. I understand the
problem: postfix does the recipient expansion, sends it off to spamassassin.
Spamassassin requeues the mail via the sendmail binary,
Hello All,
I have a setting with two postfix servers:
- the server1 is a MX for many virtual domains including somedomain.com;
- the server2 retrieves mail with fetchmail from server1 via POP3 and
distributes it to local users' mailboxes.
server1 is set up in a way that a mail addressed to let's
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 16:33 CET,
Nick Smith wrote:
> Please excuse me if this has been discussed before, i tried searching
> the archives and the documentation and google and the info seems a bit
> dated and incomplete and for exchange 5.5.
>
> We have an exchange server 2003 (n
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 16:54 CET,
post...@corwyn.net wrote:
[...]
> You need to disable it on one side, but then enable it on the other.
> In addition to receive_override_options = no_address_mappings in
> main.cf
>
> Add something like
> -o receive_override_options=
>
> to the
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 16:54 CET,
Zoltan Balogh wrote:
> I have a setting with two postfix servers:
> - the server1 is a MX for many virtual domains including somedomain.com;
> - the server2 retrieves mail with fetchmail from server1 via POP3 and
> distributes it to local users' m
>
> You don't need any accounts for the Postfix part, just a transport table
> that routes certain recipients (or whole domains) to the Exchange server
> (assuming DNS won't do that job for us). You may need accounts for
> fetchmail, but since you said that the fetchmail part already is covered
> I
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:33:42AM -0500, Nick Smith wrote:
> Please excuse me if this has been discussed before,
> i tried searching the archives and the documentation
> and google and the info seems a bit dated and incomplete
> and for exchange 5.5.
>
> We have an exchange server 2003 (not sbs)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:05:26PM +0100, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> > Is there a way to solve this on server1? I mean adding recipients
> > somewhere to the mail header so server2 knows where to deliver? I
> > already tried to set "enable_original_recipient" to "yes" - in that
> > case a "X-Original-To
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 17:12 CET,
Nick Smith wrote:
> > You don't need any accounts for the Postfix part, just a transport
> > table that routes certain recipients (or whole domains) to the
> > Exchange server (assuming DNS won't do that job for us). You may
> > need accounts for
Hi.
Today I had a "load average" issue in a postfix mail server (only runs
postfix service). Suddenly, load average started to raise and qmgr
process appeared on top of "top" taking 20-30% of CPU.
top - 18:19:54 up 7 days, 2:03, 2 users, load average: 4.94, 3.96, 4.02
Tasks: 144 total,
On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 20:25 CET,
Leonardo Coelho wrote:
> I try a simple hash file with only one address on it and the postfix
> ignored the file and deliver the e-mail.
>
> virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/alias-virtual
>
> alias-virtual:
> supo...@.com.br supor...@
On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 05:05:26PM +0100, Magnus B?ck wrote:
>
> > > Is there a way to solve this on server1? I mean adding recipients
> > > somewhere to the mail header so server2 knows where to deliver? I
> > > already tried to set "enable_original_recipie
Santiago Romero:
> I case it happens again ... Where or what should I take a look? At OS
> level (disk or network I/O, processes...) I didn't see anything before
> the "postfix restart"...
Try ``strace -o filename -p pid'' or the equivalent for your OS.
Wietse
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET,
Zoltan Balogh wrote:
> On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > Note, this notion of "correctness" is not one of those pedantic
> > types of "correctness" that is "optional". Systems that forward mail
> > to all header recipients are severely bro
I had some issues with my mailbox storage drive this morning and Postfix
started bouncing messages with this message:
Command time limit exceeded: "/usr/bin/maildrop"
I see the timeout is configurable with command_time_limit, but don't see any
way to defer the message instead of immediately boun
ericmason:
>
> I had some issues with my mailbox storage drive this morning and Postfix
> started bouncing messages with this message:
>
> Command time limit exceeded: "/usr/bin/maildrop"
>
> I see the timeout is configurable with command_time_limit, but don't see any
> way to defer the message
Hello.
First of all some general information:
Postfix version 2.3.8
MDA - Dovecot
Backend - Mysql
I configured Postfix to copy each message that it deliveres also to some
additional account. That worked great until...
Well AFAIR until I converted all mboxes to Maildirs, at least date when it
sto
On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 23:05 CET,
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> First of all some general information:
> Postfix version 2.3.8
> MDA - Dovecot
> Backend - Mysql
>
> I configured Postfix to copy each message that it deliveres also to
> some additional account. That worked grea
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:14:51PM +0100, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> > First of all some general information:
> > Postfix version 2.3.8
> > MDA - Dovecot
> > Backend - Mysql
> >
> > I configured Postfix to copy each message that it deliveres also to
> > some additional account. That worked great until..
LuKreme a écrit :
>
> On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:25, gianluca...@interfree.it wrote:
>
>> ok, i have configured postfix to sent mail trhough the smtp of my
>> internet service provider. Now one user have a certified email account
>> and he wants to sent mail by my server trhough the smtps.
>> I have s
Hello,
I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway
platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to transmit
messages.
The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port.
I have so set postfix the use policy service at the and of recipient
restriction and at th
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET,
> Zoltan Balogh wrote:
>
>> On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>>
>> > Note, this notion of "correctness" is not one of those pedantic
>> > types of "correctness" that is "optional". Systems th
Karl O. Pinc a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I'm running a mailing list (using GNU
> Mailman) and occasionally the
> list receives mail having headers with
> email addresses that have no @domain part.
> (I don't know why, and it's out of my
> hands in any case.)
> When the list software resends the mail
>
Zoltan Balogh a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 19:57 CET,
>> Zoltan Balogh wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/26/09, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>>>
Note, this notion of "correctness" is not one of those pedantic
types of "correctness"
KLaM Postmaster a écrit :
>
> So far I am not seeing a lot of "funny" addresses, however I am seeing a
> fair number for non-existent recipients fortunately the standard checks
> handle those very well.
>
if the "non-existent recipients" aren't addresses that real people could
mistype or gues
Zoltan Balogh:
> /etc/postfix/check_recipient_access:
>/(@somedomain.com)/ PREPEND X-Envelope-To: <$1>
The Postfix local(8) and virtual(8) delivery agents add
X-Original-To: headers at mailbox delivery time.
Wietse
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> I'm trying to use a policy service to limit use of my SMTP gateway
> platform 'cause of heavy load that usually means hard delays to transmit
> messages.
>
> The policy service is bound to 10031 TCP port.
>
> I have so set postfix the use policy se
Hello there, list
I'm setting up a new mailserver (postfix -> amavisd-new -> postfix)
for a company and while debugging (smtpd -v, trivial-rewrite -v) i've
noticed this
Feb 27 02:14:06 sandbox postfix/smtp[5700]: D95C920175B:
to=, relay=pop3.0x.com.ar[200.51.197.201]:25,
delay=1.2, d
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Andres Vergara wrote:
> Feb 27 02:14:10 sandbox postfix/trivial-rewrite[5695]: idle timeout --
> exiting
> Feb 27 02:15:43 sandbox postfix/smtpd[5692]: idle timeout -- exiting
>
> Those last idle timeouts.. the mails are flowing fine and amavisd is
> playing nice (afaik),
42 matches
Mail list logo
