On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:10 AM, tôba wrote:
> Hello all,
> With postfix and maildrop, I have this issue. Mails cannot be delivered
> and in mail.log, I have this:
are you facing this problem for local users.
>
>
> ...relay=maildrop, delay=0.81, delays=0.8/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.1.1,
> status=bounced (
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:35:52 -0500
"Gejo Paul" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:10 AM, tôba wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> > With postfix and maildrop, I have this issue. Mails cannot be
> > delivered and in mail.log, I have this:
>
> are you facing this problem for local users.
No, with local us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tôba wrote:
> tsaida:~#ls /var/vmail/domaintest.net/toba/new/
> total 8
> drwx-- 2 root root 4096 2009-01-05 03:47 .
> drwx-- 5 root root 4096 2009-01-02 06:51 ..
- ---^
- ^
>>> maildrop unix - n
Hi list !
As far as I understand, there is an "implicit" check in the
smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter when virtual_alias_maps
or relay_recipient_maps is specified. But when does it append?
>From my own testing, I think it is check at the very end but I would
like to know if there's a rule
* Pintér Tibor :
>
>> What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that
>> accepts e-mail?
>
> the manual tells it all.
> ever thought of reading/trying before asking?
A tad bit harsh. But true.
Anyway, look for mydestination OR virtual_alias_domains OR
virtual_mailbox_domains
how to have a sure postfix safe and stable
Kenneth Kalmer:
> Hi all
>
> Just got asked by one our sales guys if we could implement a Postfix
> business continuity service, by his definition it means that Postfix acts as
> a normal backup MX but gives the users access to their email via webmail of
> sorts.
>
> I understand the issues of us
swilting wrote:
how to have a sure postfix safe and stable
Postfix itself is always safe and stable. The rest depends on
how you configure it. Here's everything you need:
http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html
If you have a more specific question, you'll get a more
specific answer.
I have a message relay acces denied
with my client
Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 12:19 -0600, Noel Jones a écrit :
> swilting wrote:
> > how to have a sure postfix safe and stable
> >
> >
>
>
> Postfix itself is always safe and stable. The rest depends on
> how you configure it. Here's everyt
Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 01:32:39AM +0800, William Kisman wrote:
>
>
>> Thank you IBBoard, that is a nice idea, I am trying to understand it.
>>
>> Now I understand, thank you very much. This is the first time I make use of
>> my evolution mail menu to view the message he
swilting wrote:
I have a message relay acces denied
with my client
Please don't top-post; put your answers below the text you
refer to. Trim unrelated content.
General postfix trouble-shooting tips:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html
General postfix relay access control:
http://www.
What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that
accepts e-mail?
the manual tells it all.
ever thought of reading/trying before asking?
t
Jeremie Le Hen:
> Hi list again,
>
> Wietse, I take advantage of this new email to thank you for your reply
> to my earlier email.
>
> This time I just wonder why relay_domains defaults to mydestination?
Backwards compatibility.
Wietse
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:02:39 +0100
Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> tôba wrote:
>
> > tsaida:~#ls /var/vmail/domaintest.net/toba/new/
> > total 8
> > drwx-- 2 root root 4096 2009-01-05 03:47 .
> > drwx-- 5 root root 4096 2009-01-02 06:51 ..
Hello list,
Now a days we are getting lots of spam emails from our own email-ids. I want to
block this. I have tried to block senders domains which are local and not doing
smtp-auth. While implementing I come across a new problem like, when I rejected
a spam coming from my own email-id from ano
On Jan 5, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi list again,
Wietse, I take advantage of this new email to thank you for your reply
to my earlier email.
This time I just wonder why relay_domains defaults to mydestination?
I looked in the documentation and they appear to be very distinct
Hi all
Just got asked by one our sales guys if we could implement a Postfix
business continuity service, by his definition it means that Postfix acts as
a normal backup MX but gives the users access to their email via webmail of
sorts.
I understand the issues of user authentication, validating us
Antony Simonneau a écrit :
> Forget dovecot.
> For each incoming email, basically I want both to store it in Maildir format
> and relay it via SMTP.
>
it's the same whether you deliver with dovecot or directly with postfix.
to deliver both to a relay and to a "local" mailbox, you need to
"dupli
Hello,
What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that
accepts e-mail?
Regards,
/mto
--
You've been leading a dog's life. Stay off the furniture.
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 13:48 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:33:12PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
>
> > My logfiles are approx 1.5 GB each, if we rotate twice a day
> > grep sender.*recipient $logfile is really much much faster than grep
> > -i sender.*recipient $logfile
>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:53:22PM +0530, ram wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 13:48 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 08:33:12PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
> >
> > > My logfiles are approx 1.5 GB each, if we rotate twice a day
> > > grep sender.*recipient $logfile is really
Hi list again,
Wietse, I take advantage of this new email to thank you for your reply
to my earlier email.
This time I just wonder why relay_domains defaults to mydestination?
I looked in the documentation and they appear to be very distinct
parameters. In the sample main.cf, it is even stated:
Jeremie Le Hen:
> Hi list !
>
> As far as I understand, there is an "implicit" check in the
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions parameter when virtual_alias_maps
> or relay_recipient_maps is specified. But when does it append?
By default, the check happens at the end. However, you can specify
the do
I know my question may sound silly
I well send mails to my address but I can not do it when the domain name
is different
Le lundi 05 janvier 2009 à 12:48 -0600, Noel Jones a écrit :
> swilting wrote:
> > I have a message relay acces denied
> >
> > with my client
>
> Please don't top-post; put
swilting wrote:
I know my question may sound silly
I well send mails to my address but I can not do it when the domain name
is different
Please don't top-post; put your answers below the text you
refer to. Trim unrelated content.
Your question isn't silly, but you provide us no informati
I'm attempting to have a world-facing MX act as a catchall for an
endpoint server inside my network. The endpoint server has a catchall
in place for all unmatched user entries.
The postfix behavior I'd like to see is effectively a transport map that
points all mail for that domain to the spec
Corey Chandler wrote:
I'm attempting to have a world-facing MX act as a catchall for an
endpoint server inside my network. The endpoint server has a catchall
in place for all unmatched user entries.
*snip*
postconf -n output:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
On Monday, January 05, 2009 at 21:48 CET,
Corey Chandler wrote:
> I'm attempting to have a world-facing MX act as a catchall for an
> endpoint server inside my network. The endpoint server has a catchall
> in place for all unmatched user entries.
>
> The postfix behavior I'd like to see i
Magnus Bäck wrote:
That's because "@example.com" is not the correct syntax for transport
table domain wildcards. Do read transport(5) (hint: drop the "@").
Doh, that'd do it. It started life as a relay recipient map, so that'd
explain it-- I THINK that's where I got the @DOMAIN syntax from
swilting wrote:
I know my question may sound silly
I well send mails to my address but I can not do it when the domain
name
is different
i top-post sorry
i newbie
postconf -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directo
[swilt...@your-ab6cd29f8e ~]$ telnet fakessh.eu 2525
Trying 87.98.186.232...
Connected to fakessh.eu (87.98.186.232).
Escape character is '^]'.
220 r13151.ovh.net ESMTP Postfix
helo fakessh.eu
250 r13151.ovh.net
mail from:
250 2.1.0 Ok
rcpt to:
250 2.1.5 Ok
data
354 End data with .
test
.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Corey Chandler wrote:
Magnus B?ck wrote:
That's because "@example.com" is not the correct syntax for transport
table domain wildcards. Do read transport(5) (hint: drop the "@").
Doh, that'd do it. It started life as a relay recipient map, so that'd
explain it-- I THINK
swilting wrote:
Can I send mail via fakessh.eu but I can not be the sender of the mail
and I must be able to send mail to any address if the sender is me
You still haven't shown postfix logs.
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
mydomain = fakessh.eu
OK, mail to fakessh.eu will be accepted and de
I had trouble with relay access denied
when do you
postconf -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
fallback_tran
swilting wrote:
I had trouble with relay access denied
when do you
postconf -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks , permit
No, remove the above parameter from main.cf.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_inet_interfaces
permi
its ok its well that
postconf -n
[r...@r13151 ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
fallback_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/lib/imap/soc
Corey Chandler wrote:
Corey Chandler wrote:
I'm attempting to have a world-facing MX act as a catchall for an
endpoint server inside my network. The endpoint server has a
catchall in place for all unmatched user entries.
*snip*
postconf -n output:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_ma
Duane Hill wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Corey Chandler wrote:
Magnus B?ck wrote:
That's because "@example.com" is not the correct syntax for transport
table domain wildcards. Do read transport(5) (hint: drop the "@").
Doh, that'd do it. It started life as a relay recipient map, so
that'd ex
bijayant kumar wrote:
Hello list,
Now a days we are getting lots of spam emails from our own email-ids. I want to
block this. I have tried to block senders domains which are local and not doing
smtp-auth. While implementing I come across a new problem like, when I rejected
a spam coming from
> if you mean the recipient domain, then no, unless you want to run
> multiple postfix instances.
>
> do whatever you want in the filter.
>
Sorry if I'm using the terms incorrectly... I mean from my end, I'd
like to run multiple interfaces in the master.cf and send mail to
through different ones
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Tolga wrote:
> What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that accepts
> e-mail?
>
>
I just add an entry to the local-host-names file.
frappy
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:02:01PM -0500, Adam wrote:
> > if you mean the recipient domain, then no, unless you want to run
> > multiple postfix instances.
> >
> > do whatever you want in the filter.
> >
>
>
> Sorry if I'm using the terms incorrectly... I mean from my end, I'd
> like to run mult
Corey Chandler wrote:
Corey Chandler wrote:
Corey Chandler wrote:
I'm attempting to have a world-facing MX act as a catchall for an
endpoint server inside my network. The endpoint server has a
catchall in place for all unmatched user entries.
*snip*
postconf -n output:
alias_database = has
On Mon January 5 2009 20:54:49 Frappy John wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Tolga wrote:
> > What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that
> > accepts e-mail?
>
> I just add an entry to the local-host-names file.
This is not good advice, because it depends entirely on
I'm trying to install postfix in next computer:
256 MB ram
Pentium MMX 400 Mhz
No swap (i'm buying a disk, but for now there is nt)
Is there any recommendation on how may I tun postfix to work better?
TIA
Bijayant Kumar
--- On Tue, 6/1/09, DJ Lucas wrote:
> From: DJ Lucas
> Subject: Re: Blocking Spam
> To: "postfix"
> Date: Tuesday, 6 January, 2009, 6:34 AM
> bijayant kumar wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Now a days we are getting lots of spam emails from our
> own email-ids. I want to block
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon January 5 2009 20:54:49 Frappy John wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Tolga wrote:
> > > What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that
> > > accepts e-mail?
> >
> > I just add an entry to the local-host-names
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:24:20PM -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> I'm trying to install postfix in next computer:
>
> 256 MB ram
> Pentium MMX 400 Mhz
> No swap (i'm buying a disk, but for now there is nt)
>
> Is there any recommendation on how may I tun postfix to work better?
What i
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:48:47AM -0500, Frappy John wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>
> > On Mon January 5 2009 20:54:49 Frappy John wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Tolga wrote:
> > > > What is the directive I need to edit to have a second domain that
>
Hello,
I tried to create a list, then I sent a request e-mail, and I saw in the
logs that it arrived. But I can't find it anywhere. Where did it go?
Also, is this the appropriate list?
Regards,
/mto
--
There is always one thing to remember: writers are always selling somebody out.
50 matches
Mail list logo
