Hi all
I feel I should be able to figure this out for myself, but after two days of
trying I have not succeeded, so I hope someone can help me.
I have a small office network. The server runs Fedora 4, the workstations
run Windows. On the server, I run Postfix to send mail, and getmail to
retrieve
On Dec 30, 2008, at 10:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Sahil Tandon:
Joselito wrote:
I'm moving an existing domain to virtual mailboxes. All the info is
stored in a mysql database. Currently all devlivery and alias
mapping
is working correctly; I'm using virtual_mailbox_maps,
virtual_alias_
O/H mouss έγραψε:
D. Karapiperis a écrit :
O/H Wietse Venema έγραψε:
Since he asked for a "nice" way to specify this in Postfix, a "nice"
implementation of this would look like this:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mydomain, reject_mynetworks
Where the
Frank Millman wrote:
Assume our domain name is example.com, and our email addresses are
f...@example.com, b...@example.com, etc.
In main.cf, I had the following -
myhostname = fcserver.example.com
mydomain = example.com
myorigin = $mydomain
I have now changed it to -
myhostname = example.com
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
> Frank Millman wrote:
> > Assume our domain name is example.com, and our email addresses are
> > f...@example.com, b...@example.com, etc.
> >
> > In main.cf, I had the following -
> >
> > myhostname = fcserver.example.com
> > mydomain = example.com
> > myorigin = $mydom
Frank Millman wrote:
Before (not working)
mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost
mydomain = example.com
myhostname = fcserver.example.com
myorigin = $mydomain
example.com is not in $mydestination, so Postfix relays all example.com
mail to $relayhost.
D. Karapiperis a écrit :
>
> Open relay will not take place if the checks are included on
> smtpd_sender_restrictions?
an OK in smtpd_sender_restrictions does not skip
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, and relay check is done in the latter
(reject_unauth_destination).
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
> Frank Millman wrote:
> > Before (not working)
> >
> > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost
> mydomain =
> > example.com myhostname = fcserver.example.com myorigin = $mydomain
>
> example.com is not in $mydestination, so Postf
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out how I can deliver mail
usern...@examplehost.example.com
to a central mail server (smtp.example.com) without setting
myorigin = $mydomain
on the example host, because I would like to see where the mail
originiated or was originally sent to in the sender address.
Hanspeter Kunz a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to figure out how I can deliver mail
>
> usern...@examplehost.example.com
>
> to a central mail server (smtp.example.com) without setting
>
> myorigin = $mydomain
>
> on the example host, because I would like to see where the mail
> originiated
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 14:28 +0100, mouss wrote:
> Hanspeter Kunz a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out how I can deliver mail
> >
> > usern...@examplehost.example.com
> >
> > to a central mail server (smtp.example.com) without setting
> >
> > myorigin = $mydomain
> >
> > on th
Hanspeter Kunz:
> well, my intention was to use /etc/aliases for forwarding mail adresses
> like root, webmaster, logcheck, etc. to real users. This would be
> different users on every host. That's why I want first to
> process /etc/aliases and then route the mail to our central mail server.
/etc/
On Dec 31, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Hwan Dong wrote:
much thanks for your comments. I looked at the backoff. But it is to
delay the undelieverable messages, is there any way to delay all the
following message for the SAME destination domain?
i.e. if one email to a...@hotmail.com is rejected, I sti
Hwan Dong:
>
> Hi there,
> ?
> Instead of?paying email professionals, I set up a postfix SMTP server to s
>-end emails to the club members. I have also successfully enabled the delay b
>-etween sending to some ISPs. But as more as I am sending, I could still get
>-rejection. Do you have similar e
Your measurements use two different users, one with .procmailrc
file and one without .procmailrc file.
To prove that the difference in behavior is caused by the presence
or absence of .procmailrc files, you need to deliver mail to the
EXACT SAME user and change NOTHING except the presence/existenc
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 08:50 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Hanspeter Kunz:
> > well, my intention was to use /etc/aliases for forwarding mail adresses
> > like root, webmaster, logcheck, etc. to real users. This would be
> > different users on every host. That's why I want first to
> > process /etc/
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> To prove that the difference in behavior is caused by the presence
> or absence of .procmailrc files, you need to deliver mail to the
> EXACT SAME user and change NOTHING except the presence/existence
> of the .procmailrc file.
>
Doh! Yes, w
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:17:05AM -0700, Jacob Anawalt wrote:
> There must be some difference in the mapping or something between
> accounts or some mapping or aliasing that makes this happen, but I am
> at a loss to know what it is. I might have a better chance if I knew
> where /usr/bin/procmai
Jacob Anawalt:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > To prove that the difference in behavior is caused by the presence
> > or absence of .procmailrc files, you need to deliver mail to the
> > EXACT SAME user and change NOTHING except the presence/existence
> > of the .procma
Hi,
I am trying to find the answer whether Postfix will support multiple
smarthosts - i.e, sending to specific smarthosts, and if one fails, it
will try to send to the next one in the list, or will just use any
smart host in the list without issue?
I have found several examples of using smart hos
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> The user's .forward file takes precedence over mailbox delivery.
>
Almost every user with a .procmailrc had a .forward calling |
/usr/bin/procmail. Moving .foward out of the way for the same user as
I moved .procmailrc now shows postfix/loc
Andrew Hodgson:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find the answer whether Postfix will support multiple
> smarthosts - i.e, sending to specific smarthosts, and if one fails, it
> will try to send to the next one in the list, or will just use any
> smart host in the list without issue?
relayhost = [one.exa
Wietse Venema wrote:
>Andrew Hodgson:
>> I am trying to find the answer whether Postfix will support multiple
>> smarthosts - i.e, sending to specific smarthosts, and if one fails, it
>> will try to send to the next one in the list, or will just use any
>> smart host in the list without issue?
>
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 05:38:33PM +, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> I am trying to find the answer whether Postfix will support multiple
> smarthosts - i.e, sending to specific smarthosts, and if one fails, it
> will try to send to the next one in the list, or will just use any
> smart host in the l
I will be out of the office starting 12/31/2008 and will not return until
01/05/2009.
If it is an emergency, the help line at 760-6277
-- Confidentiality Notice --
This email message, including all the attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and contains confidential in
Hi,
I've been looking around but so far haven't been able to find anything
(partly because it's difficult to phrase a search query!). If someone
has a solution/config for this then that'd be great.
Before anyone points out issues with GMail and lack of control, this is
all being done on a do
IBBoard wrote:
I've been looking around but so far haven't been able to find anything
(partly because it's difficult to phrase a search query!). If someone
has a solution/config for this then that'd be great.
Before anyone points out issues with GMail and lack of control, this is
all being do
Victor Duchovni wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 05:38:33PM +, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>> I am trying to find the answer whether Postfix will support multiple
>> smarthosts - i.e, sending to specific smarthosts, and if one fails, it
>> will try to send to the next one in the list, or will just u
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html
to help with my autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as
close to "right" as possible!), I am trying to ensure that I can take
all reasonable measures to ge
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:42:43PM +, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> Ah, we can put two here can we? Can you put two entries in the
> relayhost section also?
Best to avoid reasoning by analogy when one can reason from facts.
The parameters are documented:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.htm
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
> Hi:
>
> After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and
> http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html to help with my
> autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as close to "right" as
> possible!), I am trying to ensure that I can tak
Darren Pilgrim a écrit :
> IBBoard wrote:
>> I've been looking around but so far haven't been able to find anything
>> (partly because it's difficult to phrase a search query!). If someone
>> has a solution/config for this then that'd be great.
>>
>> Before anyone points out issues with GMail and l
On Dec 31, 2008, at 6:11 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html to help with my
autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as close to "right" as
possible!), I
I'm not sure, I may have an unusual dns setup on this mail server.
The primary host name is math.missouri.edu, but it has an alias of
math.math.missouri.edu. In any case, I'm getting the dreaded:
status=SOFTBOUNCE (mail for math.math.missouri.edu loops back to myself)
Even though incoming messag
34 matches
Mail list logo
