Chris Turan a écrit :
> Thank you to everyone. I'm getting some great suggestions. I didn't
> know about several of the features postfix provides and have been
> relying mostly on spamassassin to do the work for me.
>
>> I don't see the smtpd_*_restrictions. Sensible ones there cut down on
>> a
Noel Jones a écrit :
> Ben Winslow wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I currently use a small handful of header checks to help drop some mail
>> before it reaches SpamAssassin, but I'd like to exempt mail to
>> postmaster from these checks. Is there any place in the
>> mumble_restrictions processing I can thr
Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had some suggestions on how to deal with an
> issue we're seeing when having both a content filter and a before-queue
> milter in place with postfix.
>
> Right now, we run through amavis as our content filter:
>
> main.cf:
> conte
That would be perfect solution, but as I have read it does not work for virtual
domains unfortunatelly.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:32:36AM +0530, Priscilla wrote:
> You can create a .forward file in the home directory of the user
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Contents of this .forward file should be the
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:39:08AM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> > That would be perfect solution, but as I have read it does not work for
> > virtual
> > domains unfortunatelly.
>
> virtual_alias_maps is ok. you just need to find out what cause the dups.
The only difference in
Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> That would be perfect solution, but as I have read it does not work for
> virtual
> domains unfortunatelly.
>
virtual_alias_maps is ok. you just need to find out what cause the dups.
With a content_filter, you need to disable rewrite in all but one smtpd
in a chain (wi
My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands
of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve
subsequent lookup performance? Just curious.
Thanks,
Steve Amerige
Fat Bear
Fat Bear Mail Services ha scritto:
My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many
thousands of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running
postmap improve subsequent lookup performance? Just curious.
Thanks,
Steve Amerige
Fat Bear
Hi, use CDB format is most optimize
Am Wednesday 10 December 2008 15:52:29 schrieb Fat Bear Mail Services:
> My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands
> of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve
> subsequent lookup performance? Just curious.
Short answer: no.
Long answer
Fat Bear Mail Services wrote:
My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many
thousands of lines. Does sorting the virtual file before running
postmap improve subsequent lookup performance? Just curious.
It' a hash table, so the sort order for the inserted data is irrelevant
Hi all.
I manage a few postfix spamfilter gateways for my company.
They are doing a really god job of scanning mails and delivering them to
customers mailservers.
The way we implement this is using a catch-all address to accept all
mail for customers domains, then scan the mail and try to delive
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:52:29AM -0800, Fat Bear Mail Services wrote:
> My virtual_alias_maps file (hash:/etc/postfix/virtual) is many thousands
> of lines.
This is tiny.
> Does sorting the virtual file before running postmap improve
> subsequent lookup performance? Just curious.
No. Perfo
Dennis // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I manage a few postfix spamfilter gateways for my company.
They are doing a really god job of scanning mails and delivering them to
customers mailservers.
The way we implement this is using a catch-all address to accept all
mail for customers domains,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:38:17PM +0100, Dennis // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My questions are:
> As the spamscanners are the best or primary MX´s
> for the customers domains, would postfix then just probe itself, and
> always get a positive answer due to my catch-all entry ?
>
> Or would postfix
Noel Jones wrote:
> Dennis // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I manage a few postfix spamfilter gateways for my company.
>>
>> They are doing a really god job of scanning mails and delivering them to
>> customers mailservers.
>>
>> The way we implement this is using a catch-all address to
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Dennis // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But how would recipient verification behave when the customers
> mailserver is unavailable ?
Postfix then sends a temporary failure (4xx) back to the client.
> Would one have to rely on the cache or would postfix hol
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:36:04PM +0100, Dennis // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But how would recipient verification behave when the customers
mailserver is unavailable ?
Postfix then sends a temporary failure (4xx) back to the client.
* if the result for that address is
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2008 9:27 AM +0100 mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
so let me mount my /dev/crystal/ball: would it be because of the missing
's' in smtpd_milters?
Can you send me a clone of your crystal ball? ;)
That was exactly it, thank you.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
I guess this can be accomplished using check_sender_access in
smtpd_recipient_restrictions but it seems like such a common need
I thought there might be a more direct way (i.e. lookup IP# of
sender and compare with $mynetworks when MAIL FROM: claims to be
local) ...
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Winkel a écrit :
> I guess this can be accomplished using check_sender_access in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions but it seems like such a common need
> I thought there might be a more direct way (i.e. lookup IP# of
> sender and compare with $mynetworks when MAIL FROM: claims to be
> local) ...
Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:39:08AM +0100, mouss wrote:
>> Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
>>> That would be perfect solution, but as I have read it does not work for
>>> virtual
>>> domains unfortunatelly.
>> virtual_alias_maps is ok. you just need to find out what cause the dups
Hi,
I've got a user that wants their mail forwarded to their blackberry
account. No big deal. The catch is they want attachments stripped first.
I've found this tool called renattach that does just that. I set this up
in main.cf:
renattach unix- n n - -
Hi guys.
My system specs:
Gentoo Linux
Postfix 2.5.5
I have the problem below:
When using TLS postfix sometimes (most the times) disconnects the
client just after it issues the RCPT command.
When I try to re-send the test email just after the error or when not
using TLS the problem doe
I tried to find one of the messages in the logs. It's damn hard to find
it since it's really weird... and it all makes no sense to me. I think
this email source belongs to the logs below ( added to prevent
potential damage due to fudged HTML ).
email source:
>
>
From - Thu Dec 11 02:09
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 06:49:46 +0100
Magnus Bäck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, December 08, 2008 at 06:36 CET,
> Frederick Reeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a working Postfix 2.5.5 setup that uses several rbls. I would
> > like to collect the mail being blocked by these r
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.P. Trosclair
> Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2008 10:32 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: mail forward based on user to specific filter then
> to another address
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a us
Jesús Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
Hi guys.
My system specs:
Gentoo Linux
Postfix 2.5.5
I have the problem below:
When using TLS postfix sometimes (most the times) disconnects the client
just after it issues the RCPT command.
When I try to re-send the test email just after the error or when n
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:04:54PM -0700, Jes?s Manuel Loaiza Vidal wrote:
>I guess its TLS session related or something related to race conditions.
>
>I'm using PostgreSQL and LDAP lookup tables to do user mailbox lookup and
>various other things and Dovecot SASL for authentication
I use postfix 2.3 with cyrus-sasl for smtp-auth
cyrus-sasl needs a restart every few hours ( they havent fixed the
memory leaks )
The problem is if saslauthd is momentarily unavailable , postfix cant
(obviously) authenticate the smtp session.
Postfix rejects the mail with a permanent failure.
Hi Guys,
I've recently configured a mail server running
postfix+dovecot+mysql+postfixadmin, it is now in production and everything
is working fine except for MAC Entourage mail which is a PITA IMO which says
it doesn't support authentication, outlook and thunderbird doesn't
experience this issue. A
ram wrote:
> I use postfix 2.3 with cyrus-sasl for smtp-auth
>
> cyrus-sasl needs a restart every few hours ( they havent fixed the
> memory leaks )
>
>
> The problem is if saslauthd is momentarily unavailable , postfix cant
> (obviously) authenticate the smtp session.
> Postfix rejects the
jan gestre wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've recently configured a mail server running
postfix+dovecot+mysql+postfixadmin, it is now in production and
everything is working fine except for MAC Entourage mail which is a PITA
IMO which says it doesn't support authentication, outlook and
thunderbird doesn't
ram wrote:
The problem is if saslauthd is momentarily unavailable , postfix cant
(obviously) authenticate the smtp session.
Postfix rejects the mail with a permanent failure. How do I change this
to a 4xx error code so that the clients server would retry the mail
Postfix has no way of knowin
Roland Plüss wrote:
`reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch' ignored: no SASL support
Well, there ya go. There is no restriction that would prevent that
message from being delivered, so of course they get through.
At a very minimum, please add: 'reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org' to
34 matches
Mail list logo
