> I narrowed down the problem to this config value:
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
All problems are reported to logfile.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
Wietse
TO REPORT A PROBLEM see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Any ideas what causes these?
>
> Jul 21 23:14:43 kd1 postfix/qmgr[20699]: warning: F320A29569: rcpt count
> mismatch (-2)
...
> Version is postfix-2.3.r8,3 (FreeBSD port)
This problem was removed by a code reorganization in Postfix 2.4,
when I added support for "message body"
Hi guys,
I'm running a mail gateway (soon to add a second one) and I've just
recently started having problems with SPF as many of our users just
use us to forward mail. At the moment all I have is an SPF entry in
DNS so I'm looking at SPF and SRS patches/plugins for postfix. The
last SRS patch I f
Guy wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm running a mail gateway (soon to add a second one) and I've just
> recently started having problems with SPF as many of our users just
> use us to forward mail. At the moment all I have is an SPF entry in
> DNS so I'm looking at SPF and SRS patches/plugins for postfix.
Hi Brian,
2008/9/8 Brian Evans - Postfix List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> SPF running in conjunction with Postfix will only do verification.
> http://www.openspf.org/Software lists the packages known to work properly.
> What makes you think you have a problem?
I should have been more specific. I've ha
Guy wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm running a mail gateway (soon to add a second one) and I've just
recently started having problems with SPF as many of our users just
use us to forward mail.
Can you give more details here? do you forward mail for domains that
have a "-all"? (if so, can you give an exam
Guy wrote:
Hi Brian,
2008/9/8 Brian Evans - Postfix List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
SPF running in conjunction with Postfix will only do verification.
http://www.openspf.org/Software lists the packages known to work properly.
What makes you think you have a problem?
I should have been more specific
Guy:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm running a mail gateway (soon to add a second one) and I've just
> recently started having problems with SPF as many of our users just
> use us to forward mail. At the moment all I have is an SPF entry in
> DNS so I'm looking at SPF and SRS patches/plugins for postfix. The
>
Hi Mouss,
2008/9/8 mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> we'd like to see a concrete example: sender domain and the "uncooperative"
> remote server.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host ricercare.co.uk[195.216.196.141] said: 550
SPF: x.x.x.x is not allowed to send mail from growse.com (in reply
to RCPT TO command)
Hi Wietse,
2008/9/8 Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> SRS requires envelope sender munging. This would require an external
> content filter. Postfix Milter support to replace the envelope
> sender is still on the todo list.
Are you aware of one that works well with Postfix? There are a few
pac
Guy wrote:
> Hi Mouss,
>
> 2008/9/8 mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> we'd like to see a concrete example: sender domain and the "uncooperative"
>> remote server.
>>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host ricercare.co.uk[195.216.196.141] said: 550
> SPF: x.x.x.x is not allowed to send mail from growse
Hello,
A client has a domain (sample.com) which resolves to the IP 190.190.168.54
The MX records this domain point to another IP completely different:
64.233.171.27
My postfix server houses the domain someotherdomain.com, the problem is that
I am unable to send email to my clients domain.
When I
Marcelo Iturbe wrote:
Hello,
A client has a domain (sample.com) which resolves to the IP 190.190.168.54
The MX records this domain point to another IP completely different:
64.233.171.27
I don't see the same IPs here.
$ host sample.com
sample.com has address 208.87.33.150
sample.com mail is h
The last error messages I get are these:
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem talking
to service private/scache: Connection timed out
Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning: problem talking
to service private/scache: Connection timed out
S
Hi,
I am trying to configure my postfix server to allow two types of users: trusted
and authenticated
The trusted users are sending from a set of IP addresses and I don't require
them to authenticate
since this has occurred up stream.
The authenticated users are using thirdparty clients like t
Devdas Bhagat wrote:
> The last error messages I get are these:
> Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
> talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
> Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning: problem
> talking to service private
Charles Account wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to configure my postfix server to allow two types of users: trusted and authenticated
The trusted users are sending from a set of IP addresses and I don't require them to authenticate
since this has occurred up stream.
for these you need permit_mynetwor
mouss schreef:
gerrit wrote:
Hi All,
Recently i implemented the sender check. First i made a split for the
processing and put some restrictions under smtpd_sender_restrictions
and some under stmpd_recipient_restrictions.
This resulted in too many rejections, so i left the sender
restrictio
Hi everyone.
In my main.cf i got this line :
authorized_submit_users = !apache, static:anyone
This line restrict apache from sending mail via the sendmail way. Since
most users use the mail() statement in php, which uses sendmail to sent
mails, its the preffered way.
My goal is, to restrict
Hi All,
I'm trying to set postfix up to deliver using dovecot's LDA delivery
agent. I'm using postfixadmin, with mysql virtual user tables. Those
tables include a "transport" field, which is set to "virtual:". But I
thought that the main.cf virtual_transport setting would redirect these
throug
Scott Sharkey wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to set postfix up to deliver using dovecot's LDA delivery
> agent. I'm using postfixadmin, with mysql virtual user tables. Those
> tables include a "transport" field, which is set to "virtual:". But I
> thought that the main.cf virtual_transport sett
gerrit wrote:
Hi everyone.
In my main.cf i got this line :
authorized_submit_users = !apache, static:anyone
The above prevents the apache USER from using the sendmail
command. This has nothing to do with the envelope sender
address or From: header.
Specifically, this prevents the apache
gerrit wrote:
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_whitelist
check_recipient_access
hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_whitelist
reject_unauth_destination
reject_unverified_sender
sender verification callbacks are not very appreci
Scott Sharkey wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to set postfix up to deliver using dovecot's LDA delivery
agent. I'm using postfixadmin, with mysql virtual user tables. Those
tables include a "transport" field, which is set to "virtual:". But I
thought that the main.cf virtual_transport setting would
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:35:40PM +0530, Devdas Bhagat wrote:
> The last error messages I get are these:
> Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
> talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
> Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: war
Scott Sharkey wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to set postfix up to deliver using dovecot's LDA delivery
agent. I'm using postfixadmin, with mysql virtual user tables. Those
tables include a "transport" field, which is set to "virtual:". But I
thought that the main.cf virtual_transport setting would
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Scott Sharkey wrote:
transport_maps setting is global. Each entry in the lookup refers
directly to a transport in master.cf.
Having 'virtual:' means always use the virtual listing in master.cf and
ignore what is in main.cf.
I did not realize that... that is
Devdas Bhagat:
> The last error messages I get are these:
> Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
> talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
> Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning: problem
> talking to service private/scach
Wietse Venema:
> Devdas Bhagat:
> > The last error messages I get are these:
> > Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
> > talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
> > Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]: warning: problem
> > talki
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 03:31:29PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > The master daemon triggers qmgr and pickup regularly. That "trigger"
> > write is non-blocking with a timeout of 1, so it cannot block the
> > master daemon. Except of course when the kernel is messed up.
>
> Hmm, except that writ
Wietse Venema:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Devdas Bhagat:
> > > The last error messages I get are these:
> > > Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
> > > talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
> > > Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[20375]:
Victor Duchovni:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 03:31:29PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > The master daemon triggers qmgr and pickup regularly. That "trigger"
> > > write is non-blocking with a timeout of 1, so it cannot block the
> > > master daemon. Except of course when the kernel is messed up.
Scott Sharkey wrote:
> Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>> Scott Sharkey wrote:
>
>> transport_maps setting is global. Each entry in the lookup refers
>> directly to a transport in master.cf.
>> Having 'virtual:' means always use the virtual listing in master.cf and
>> ignore what is in main.cf.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 08:15:24AM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Travis wrote:
> >I also notice that even though the SSL keys have passwords on them,
> >postfix never prompts for them.
> >
>
> daemons do not prompt.
Perhaps they should not, but apache does. Dovecot has a config file
entry with the passw
Travis:
> It turns out that my software (tinyca2) as well as the normal
> openssl genrsa -des3 -rand /etc/hosts -out smtpd.key 1024
> (suggested here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix)
> both prompt for passwords with which to encrypt the key.
See instructions at the end of
http://www.po
2008/9/9 Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps they should not, but apache does. Dovecot has a config file
> entry with the password to the key to allow use of keys with
> passwords, which is helpful because:
Apache's default behaviour to prompt is less than ideal, but can be
configured to do oth
Wietse Venema:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Any ideas what causes these?
> >
> > Jul 21 23:14:43 kd1 postfix/qmgr[20699]: warning: F320A29569: rcpt count
> > mismatch (-2)
> ...
> > Version is postfix-2.3.r8,3 (FreeBSD port)
>
> This problem was removed by a code reorganization in Postfix 2.4,
> when
Hi all,
I have set up Postfix 2.5.4 with TLS, Cyrus SASL and LDAP lookups for users.
I tested it with openssl s_client command on ports 25, 465 and 587 and
everything works (authentication and test emails). I use self signed CA
certificates.
I also tested sending mail on gmail, yahoo and other p
I have the following mynetworks defined
Dispite having "69.31.160.0/20" defined and "!69.31.174.220" defined, I
can still relay mail from 69.31.174.220 without smtp authentication. Why
is this?
Does order matter or is there another problem with my syntax?
mynetworks = 69.31.160.0/20,
Hi Brian,
I'm editing this to make it a bit shorter.
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Scott Sharkey wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
Scott Sharkey wrote:
We need your 'postconf -n' to give more hints about a correct setup.
(with virtual_ maps explained too)
see below:
alias_data
James Robertson wrote:
Recently we noticed an increase in junk and discovered that it's
coming from Hotmail (and to a lesser extent Yahoo).
The problem is that these spammers are smarter that the average spammer.
The don't spam flatout all the time (not to us anyway) and since the
mail comes
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris St Denis
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2008 10:41 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: my networks exclusions not working?
>
> I have the following mynetworks defined
>
> Dispite havin
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:20:32AM +0300, Alex Bernea wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have set up Postfix 2.5.4 with TLS, Cyrus SASL and LDAP lookups for users.
>
> I tested it with openssl s_client command on ports 25, 465 and 587 and
> everything works (authentication and test emails). I use self signe
Chris St Denis wrote:
I have the following mynetworks defined
Dispite having "69.31.160.0/20" defined and "!69.31.174.220" defined, I
can still relay mail from 69.31.174.220 without smtp authentication. Why
is this?
Does order matter or is there another problem with my syntax?
Yes, order m
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Victor Duchovni <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:20:32AM +0300, Alex Bernea wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have set up Postfix 2.5.4 with TLS, Cyrus SASL and LDAP lookups for
> users.
> >
> > I tested it with openssl s_client command on ports
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 01:23:53PM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> > relay_recipient_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/relay
> >
>
> This looks potentially bad to me, but without knowing what is in that
> /etc/postfix/relay map, it's hard to judge.
> > relayhost = [redacted-trap]
> >
>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 03:27:31PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Devdas Bhagat:
> > The last error messages I get are these:
> > Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook postfix/smtp[7998]: warning: problem
> > talking to service private/scache: Connection timed out
> > Sep 8 13:54:37 jaundiced-outlook
47 matches
Mail list logo
