Claudio Prono wrote:
I resend that question to the mailing list, because i need a solution.
Sorry. Anyone have an idea of how to do that?
The best way is to run dspam in relay mode (it runs as an LMTP daemon
and after filtering, forwards mail back to postfix. same way amavisd-new
does, so y
Magnus � wrote:
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 04:48 CEST,
Zhang Huangbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
In my record:
cut<<
mysql> select username,restriction_class,restricteddomain from
restrictions;
+--+---+--+
| username | res
Udo Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Summary: Solaris and Linux file system behavior has changed over
>> time, breaking one of the assumptions in Postfix. See below for a
>> description of the behavior and how it disagrees with standards.
>>
>> Postfix is not affected o
Hello All,
I have two questions as follows:
1. I have set up the postfix server as follows:
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
inet_interfaces =
Matthias Andree:
> If Postfix (or qmail[1], or whatever application) claims to support a
> particular operating system (Linux, Solaris - rather than POSIX), then
> it has to make proper assumptions to work in that possibly different
> environment that Postfix claims to support, rather than blame th
In my master.cf I have the following-
fax unix - n n - 1 pipe
flags= user=uucp argv=/usr/local/bin/faxmail -d -n ${user}
In my main.cf I have the following-
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_invalid_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_sender
Michael schrieb:
In my master.cf I have the following-
fax unix - n n - 1 pipe
flags= user=uucp argv=/usr/local/bin/faxmail -d -n ${user}
In my main.cf I have the following-
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_invalid_hostname,
rej
Thanks. That has fixed it. My next questions are-
1. Does it matter what order the restrictions appear in?
2. What is the 'permit' at the end for?
> > In my main.cf I have the following-
> >
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> > reject_invalid_hostname,
> > reject_non_fqdn_sende
* Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks. That has fixed it. My next questions are-
>
> 1. Does it matter what order the restrictions appear in?
Of course. First match wins-
> 2. What is the 'permit' at the end for?
To permit the request :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [E
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Bill Anderson wrote:
To be fair, if he only want to read the body, he could "shell
out" to postcat to *read* it so long as it was done late
enough in the process - i.e. end-of-data. I make no guarantees
about performance of such acts, however. ;) I have done this
*on occas
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:13:32 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Thanks. That has fixed it. My next questions are-
> >
> > 1. Does it matter what order the restrictions appear in?
>
> Of course. First match wins-
>
> > 2. What is the 'permit' at the end for?
>
> To permit t
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Noel Jones wrote:
Yes, a policy service is always* less resource intensive than
a content_filter or proxy.
*assuming well written software doing about the same thing.
Great! I hope the difference is big enough, since I want to
implement greylisting on the top of it. :-)
* Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:13:32 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Thanks. That has fixed it. My next questions are-
> > >
> > > 1. Does it matter what order the restrictions appear in?
> >
> > Of course. First match wins-
> >
> > > 2. Wha
Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I have two questions as follows:
1. I have set up the postfix server as follows:
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
inet_interfaces = all
mail_owner = postfix
mailq_p
Num ber wrote:
(Sorry for the last message, it's was not readable !! )
Hello,I'm sorry i know that the question was already asked, but i have try
manything, and no one work..
I'm try to have mailman with postfix..
I use Postfix with mysql, and for my domaine everything work perfectly..
Now i h
What I want to achieve now is to ONLY allow authenticated clients (via SASL)
to send to the fax email address...
How can this be achieved?
---
In my master.cf I have the following-
fax unix - n n - 1 pipe
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Bill Anderson wrote:
To be fair, if he only want to read the body, he could "shell out" to
postcat to *read* it so long as it was done late enough in the process
- i.e. end-of-data. I make no guarantees about performance of such
acts, however.
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008, Noel Jones wrote:
Yes, a policy service is always* less resource intensive than a
content_filter or proxy.
*assuming well written software doing about the same thing.
Great! I hope the difference is big enough, since I want to implement
greyl
Michael wrote:
What I want to achieve now is to ONLY allow authenticated clients (via SASL)
to send to the fax email address...
How can this be achieved?
In your recipients table, rather than:
faxdomain OK
use instead:
faxdomain permit_sasl_authenticated
If you want to also allow unauthe
I want a single account to only accept NDRs. Other email should be rejected.
Would the following work correctly?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
...
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/receieve_only
...
/etc/postfix/receieve_only:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/ndr
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
I want a single account to only accept NDRs. Other email should be
rejected.
Would the following work correctly?
smtpd_recipient_restrictions:
...
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/receieve_only
...
/etc/postfix/receieve_only:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] check
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff wrote:
>>
>> We have an email gateway appliance at the network edge for spam/virus
>> filtering. It relays mail to multiple postfix+imap servers behind the
>> firewall. The back-end servers communicate directly with each
Jeff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff wrote:
We have an email gateway appliance at the network edge for spam/virus
filtering. It relays mail to multiple postfix+imap servers behind the
firewall. The back-end servers communicate directly with eac
Jeff:
> It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
> succeeds at blocking the specified aliases when relayed through our
> gateway, but it does not do so at the SMTP level. It generates bounce
> notifications, which in the end will create back-scatter. The bounce
> messag
> > > > pickupfifo n - n 60 1 pickup
> > > > -o content_filter=smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025
> > > > [127.0.0.1]:10025
> > > > inet n - n - - smtpd
> > > >
> > > > and remove 127.0.0.1 from mynetworks. Of c
Zhang Huangbin wrote:
Magnus � wrote:
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 04:48 CEST,
Zhang Huangbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
In my record:
cut<<
mysql> select username,restriction_class,restricteddomain from
restrictions;
+--+---+--
Num ber wrote:
(Sorry for the last message, it's was not readable !! )
Hello,I'm sorry i know that the question was already asked, but i have try
manything, and no one work..
I'm try to have mailman with postfix..
I use Postfix with mysql, and for my domaine everything work perfectly..
Now i h
Rupert Reid wrote:
Hello All,
I have two questions as follows:
1.I have set up the postfix server as follows:
postconf -n
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
inet_interfaces = all
I'm trying to help someone with Postfix, and it looks like this one is
a few versions behind. They say that they're not sure if it was
isntalled Via RPM or a source tarball. This is a RHEL5 server. It's
set up to use Dovecot and MySQL. There are RPMs listed as installed
(rpm -qa) but I don't know h
Blake Carver:
> I'm trying to help someone with Postfix, and it looks like this one is
> a few versions behind. They say that they're not sure if it was
> isntalled Via RPM or a source tarball. This is a RHEL5 server. It's
> set up to use Dovecot and MySQL. There are RPMs listed as installed
> (rpm
Hello List,
I have a strange problem an spent the whole day on looking for a
solution:
I configured postfix to use virtual_mailbox_maps and maildrop like this:
virtual_mailbox_base = /mailboxes
virtual_minimum_uid = 1
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/my/domains.conf
virtual_mailb
Jan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F6hrich?=:
> virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/my/domains.conf
> virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/my/vmailbox.conf
...
> Aug 19 19:31:37 mail2 postfix/smtpd[12877]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> unknown[10.221.0.250]: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: R
> ecipie
Jan Röhrich wrote:
Hello List,
I have a strange problem an spent the whole day on looking for a
solution:
I configured postfix to use virtual_mailbox_maps and maildrop like this:
virtual_mailbox_base = /mailboxes
virtual_minimum_uid = 1
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/my/domai
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff:
>> It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
>> succeeds at blocking the specified aliases when relayed through our
>> gateway, but it does not do so at the SMTP level. It generates bounce
Jeff:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeff:
> >> It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
> >> succeeds at blocking the specified aliases when relayed through our
> >> gateway, but it does not do so at the SMTP level. It
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff:
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jeff:
>> >> It took me a while before I could test this. The recommended solution
>> >> succeeds at blocking the specified aliases whe
Jeff:
> I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
> whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
Reject [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the FRONT_END host.
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access h
2008/8/20 Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can "verify" if the installed software matches the RPM package.
>
> # rpm -qa 'postfix*'
> # rpm --verify name-of-package...
If you're still stuck, you might also want to check if the files
actually belong to any package (I don't believe they will
Thanks for your reply...Finaly, what was the best way to have maildrop working
with virtual user in postfix ?How do you do that ? ( a dedicated service in
master)Thanks to all !!> First, understand that you need rewrite the
destination in > /etc/mailman/virtual-mailman to a domain listed in
myd
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff:
>> I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
>> whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
>
> Reject [EMAIL PROTECTED] o
> Do not list googlemail.com in virtual_mailbox_domains.
>
> To verify:
>
> $ postmap -q googlemail.com mysql:/etc/postfix/my/domains.conf
>
> This command should produce no output, no error message, and it
> should terminate with a non-zero exit status.
Thanks a lot for this fast answer!
Jeff:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeff:
> >> I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
> >> whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
> >
> > Reject
Jeff wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff:
I want the back-end to tell the front-end gateway 550 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but I want it to tell my other internal MTAs OK,
whilst not breaking regular recipient verification.
Reject [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:20:23 Noel Jones wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > What I want to achieve now is to ONLY allow authenticated clients (via
> > SASL) to send to the fax email address...
> >
> > How can this be achieved?
>
> In your recipients table, rather than:
> faxdomain OK
>
> use instead:
> fa
Presenting using the following blacklists...
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
psbl.surriel.com
zen.spamhaus.org
These do a good job for me, but I wanted to look for opinions on a
couple additional ones. Specifically look for false-positive opinions,
adding additional DNS lookups isn't much concern to me.
T
Hello List,
This is my first post to this list so please excuse any indiscretions. I have a
problem where my carrier's/ISP entire CIDR/Subnet is blacklisted by some email
carriers. My ISP does provide a relay/smarthost for outbound SMTP but it
doesn't use TLS, so I don't want to route all of o
-Original Message-
From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 6:19 PM
To: postfix users list
Subject: Re: Postfix and Hylafax faxmail - part 2
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:20:23 Noel Jones wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > What I want to achieve now is to ONLY allow authenticate
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Adam C. Mathews wrote:
Presenting using the following blacklists...
dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
psbl.surriel.com
zen.spamhaus.org
These do a good job for me, but I wanted to look for opinions on a
couple additional ones. Specifically look for false-positive opinions,
adding addi
Rodre Ghorashi-Zadeh wrote:
Hello List,
This is my first post to this list so please excuse any indiscretions. I have a
problem where my carrier's/ISP entire CIDR/Subnet is blacklisted by some email
carriers. My ISP does provide a relay/smarthost for outbound SMTP but it doesn't use
TLS, so I
Apologies if this has been asked before.
I would like to log the message headers of email passing through postfix
so I can review them.
What is the recommended way to do this and will it have an effect on
performance? our mail server does not process a very high volume of mail.
Thanks.
Ja
I highly recommend you sub to spam-l and post your question there also.
http://www.claws-and-paws.com/spam-l/spam-l.html
FWIW, here's my dnsbl config:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client dsn.rfc-ignorant.org,
51 matches
Mail list logo
