Re: virtual mailboxes BUT NOT virtual domain

2012-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: > > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 07:05:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > >> Michael Hellwig: > >> > I've been butting my head against this one for quite some time now. > >> > >> You might want to read this document: > >> > >> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html > >> >

Re: virtual mailboxes BUT NOT virtual domain

2012-05-02 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von The Eye : On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 07:05:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: Michael Hellwig: > I've been butting my head against this one for quite some time now. You might want to read this document: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html This decribes what is needed to av

Re: virtual mailboxes BUT NOT virtual domain

2012-05-02 Thread The Eye
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 07:05:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Michael Hellwig: > > I've been butting my head against this one for quite some time now. > > You might want to read this document: > > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html > > This decribes what is needed to avoid "user

Re: virtual mailboxes BUT NOT virtual domain

2012-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Hellwig: > I've been butting my head against this one for quite some time now. You might want to read this document: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html This decribes what is needed to avoid "user unknown" and "relay access denied" errors. After this, setting up a suitable

virtual mailboxes BUT NOT virtual domain

2012-05-02 Thread Michael Hellwig
I've been butting my head against this one for quite some time now. Given: a system that used to be running courier-mta which started getting on my nerves like crazy, which is why I decided to switch to the postfix/dovecot combo that almost everyone seems to use nowadays. What I had on the courier