On 22/03/21 3:44 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
With those set, all services in master.cf explicitly chroot=n, and
compatibility_level set to 99
don't do this. You never know what changes in the future and will require
your intervention.
Indeed. Postfix 3.6 comes with a han
I have a well established 2.10 Postfix instance on 2.10
(CentOS7) which is to be migrated to a new machine running
Postfix 3.3 (on RHEL8).
I've been reading
http://www.postfix.org/COMPATIBILITY_README.html, and from what
I can see the backward compatibility issues I may run into are
(with ex
- Message from Viktor Dukhovni -
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:13:00 -0400
From: Viktor Dukhovni
Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: upgrade 2.10 - 3.3 config compatibility
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:32:18PM +1000, Simon
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:32:18PM +1000, Simon Wilson wrote:
> I have temporarily set it at 0 after reading
> http://www.postfix.org/COMPATIBILITY_README.html to ensure that I pick
> up in logging if/when backwards-compatibility is triggered by the
> legacy settings as follows (from
> htt
- Message from Viktor Dukhovni -
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 21:15:36 -0400
From: Viktor Dukhovni
Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: upgrade 2.10 - 3.3 config compatibility
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:17:16AM +1000, Simon
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:17:16AM +1000, Simon Wilson wrote:
> I've removed mynetworks_style based on improved knowledge as noted
> above; commented out append_dot_mydomain and relay_domains, have set
> compatibility_level to 0, and will monitor for messages.
The right compatibility level to
- Message from Matus UHLAR - fantomas -
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 15:26:12 +0100
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Subject: Re: upgrade 2.10 - 3.3 config compatibility
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
I have a well established 2.10 Postfix instance on 2.10 (CentOS7)
which is to
Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> >With those set, all services in master.cf explicitly chroot=n, and
> >compatibility_level set to 99
>
> don't do this. You never know what changes in the future and will require
> your intervention.
Indeed. Postfix 3.6 comes with a handful breaking changes. The
compat
I have a well established 2.10 Postfix instance on 2.10 (CentOS7)
which is to be migrated to a new machine running Postfix 3.3 (on
RHEL8).
I've been reading http://www.postfix.org/COMPATIBILITY_README.html,
and from what I can see the backward compatibility issues I may run
into are (with exi
- Message from Simon Wilson -
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:40:11 +1000
From: Simon Wilson
Reply-To: si...@simonandkate.net
Subject: upgrade 2.10 - 3.3 config compatibility
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
I have a well established 2.10 Postfix instance on 2.10 (CentOS7
I have a well established 2.10 Postfix instance on 2.10 (CentOS7)
which is to be migrated to a new machine running Postfix 3.3 (on RHEL8).
I've been reading http://www.postfix.org/COMPATIBILITY_README.html,
and from what I can see the backward compatibility issues I may run
into are (with e
11 matches
Mail list logo
