On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Noel Jones wrote:
Res wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
After looking at it, I tend to agree :)
Actually, amavisd-new is well suited for this.
At it's core, it's a high performance
Res wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
After looking at it, I tend to agree :)
Actually, amavisd-new is well suited for this.
At it's core, it's a high performance and very robust smtp
proxy - just what
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Res wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>>> the pre-queue filter can still reject the message at end of data with a
>>> "no such user" style error.
>
> This is what I was thinking of since milters for, say, virus scanning do
> this sort of thing, pass the messa
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, mouss wrote:
> Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> > On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, mouss wrote:
> >
> >> Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>> Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
> >>> cursory understanding of the SMTP protocol, I am not sure your go
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, mouss wrote:
>
>> Sahil Tandon a écrit :
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
>>> cursory understanding of the SMTP protocol, I am not sure your goal is
>>> reachable even with a simple pre-queue fi
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, mouss wrote:
> Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> > [snip]
> >
> > Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
> > cursory understanding of the SMTP protocol, I am not sure your goal is
> > reachable even with a simple pre-queue filter. Before passing mail
mouss a écrit :
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
[snip]
Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
cursory understanding of the SMTP protocol, I am not sure your goal is
reachable even with a simple pre-queue filter. Before passing mail to a
pre-queue filter (or milter),
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> Don't use amavisd-new; it would be overkill for this task. And from my
> cursory understanding of the SMTP protocol, I am not sure your goal is
> reachable even with a simple pre-queue filter. Before passing mail to a
> pre-queue filter (or milter), smtpd(8) a
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Res wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
>
>>> when f...@example.com SMTP connects to our SMTP, I want the message
>>> "secretly accepted" (for lack of a better term) but then I want our
>>> SMTP to,
>>> after accepting, return: 550 service unavailable in their
Res wrote:
Hi Terry,
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
I have an internal requirement to deny access to an email address,
which I'd like to do via access, however, we'd also like to accept
that message for storage somewhere, I was thinking of the access BCC
method, but then I need to
Res wrote:
Hi,
I have an internal requirement to deny access to an email address,
which I'd like to do via access, however, we'd also like to accept
that message for storage somewhere, I was thinking of the access BCC
method, but then I need to also send a 5xx message in their connect
transa
11 matches
Mail list logo
