Wietse:
There. And to repeat myself, it depends on the destination
MTA how it delvers user%not-your-domain@your-domain.
Viktor:
You'll ideally let go of the goal, but if not, you'll need to allow
untrusted routing, and regularly test carefully to make sure that it
does not create
Damian:
> Wietse:
> > Postfix looks for @, % or ! in the address localpart, for example,
> > user%not-your-domain@your-domain.
> >
> > There is no special resolver.
> I believe, this is what I wrote.
> > If Postfix finds any, like it would in user%not-your-domain@your-domain,
> > and "allow_untrust
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 05:23:31PM +0200, Damian wrote:
> > My advice is to redesign the system to avoid the need for messing around
> > with the untrusted routing safety net. If you need to turn that knob,
> > you're asking for trouble, and probably doing something wrong
orward anywhere.
---
Viktor:
So one way in which untrusted routing could cause problems is
when:
* The destination "your-domain" also Postfix
Why "also"? In my scenario, there is only one Postfix I am in control
of, and this Postfix is responsible for "your-d
address
class and as a preliminary rewrite before cleanup performs its
various generally table-based rewrites.
So one way in which untrusted routing could cause problems is
when:
* The destination "your-domain" also Postfix
* It lists "your-domain" in $mydestination
* It
Damian:
> > Damian:
> >> I am trying to understand "allow_untrusted_routing = yes" and the
> >> circumstances where it is (un)safe. The documentation mentions an open
> >> relay loophole in the context of backup MXes. Is untrusted routing safe,
> >
Damian:
I am trying to understand "allow_untrusted_routing = yes" and the
circumstances where it is (un)safe. The documentation mentions an open
relay loophole in the context of backup MXes. Is untrusted routing safe,
if Postfix has no explicit *_mx_* configuration?
This is a
Damian:
> I am trying to understand "allow_untrusted_routing = yes" and the
> circumstances where it is (un)safe. The documentation mentions an open
> relay loophole in the context of backup MXes. Is untrusted routing safe,
> if Postfix has no explicit *_mx_* configuration
I am trying to understand "allow_untrusted_routing = yes" and the
circumstances where it is (un)safe. The documentation mentions an open
relay loophole in the context of backup MXes. Is untrusted routing safe,
if Postfix has no explicit *_mx_* configuration?
Consider the sa
