--On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:06 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
There wasn't a /dev/*random when Postfix was initially ported to
MacOSX, and no-one has told me when /dev/*random were added.
Perhaps you can provide "uname -s" and "uname -r".
Have you verified that these work? Unfortunately ex
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, LuKreme wrote:
> On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>> On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
>> wrote:
>>> These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it wants
>>> to
>>> use. This might explain why it is empty in a
--On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:28 AM -0600 LuKreme
wrote:
On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it
wants to
use. This might explain why it is emp
LuKreme wrote:
On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it wants to
use. This might explain why it is empty in a Postfix install on Mac
OS X,
since it
On 21-Jul-2009, at 16:43, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter > wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it
wants to
use. This might explain why it is empty in a Postfix install on Mac
OS X,
since it isn't require
--On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 7:06 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Is there a particular reason for this?
There wasn't a /dev/*random when Postfix was initially ported to
MacOSX, and no-one has told me when /dev/*random were added.
Perhaps you can provide "uname -s" and "uname -r".
Have you ve
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> I noticed that on my OSX builds, there is no default tls_random_source
> defined, yet /dev/urandom exists on those systems:
>
> OSX 10.4:
>
> build24:~ build$ ls -l /dev/urandom
> crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel8, 1 Jun 18 13:38 /dev/urandom
> build24:~ build$ uname -a
>
--On Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:16 AM +0200 Patrick Ben Koetter
wrote:
These days OpenSSL is able to determine which random source it wants to
use. This might explain why it is empty in a Postfix install on Mac OS X,
since it isn't required anymore.
This is definitely used by the Postfix tl
* Quanah Gibson-Mount :
> --On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:44 PM -0400 Linux Addict
> wrote:
>
>
>> Was the postfix compiled with TLS enabled? If yes what does postconf
>> -d|grep tls_random_source shows?
>
> Yes, it was, and postfix -d shows it not to be set to anything. Which is
> why I'm aski
--On Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:44 PM -0400 Linux Addict
wrote:
Was the postfix compiled with TLS enabled? If yes what does postconf
-d|grep tls_random_source shows?
Yes, it was, and postfix -d shows it not to be set to anything. Which is
why I'm asking about it. :) I.e., I'm curious if t
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I noticed that on my OSX builds, there is no default tls_random_source
> defined, yet /dev/urandom exists on those systems:
>
> OSX 10.4:
>
> build24:~ build$ ls -l /dev/urandom
> crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel8, 1 Jun 18 13:38 /dev/u
I noticed that on my OSX builds, there is no default tls_random_source
defined, yet /dev/urandom exists on those systems:
OSX 10.4:
build24:~ build$ ls -l /dev/urandom
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel8, 1 Jun 18 13:38 /dev/urandom
build24:~ build$ uname -a
Darwin build24.lab.zimbra.com 8.11.1 D
12 matches
Mail list logo
