On 3/2/2010 2:30 PM, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
192.168.0.110:126 inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reje
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:30:21PM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Ok - inferring from that, I tried:
> 192.168.0.110:128 inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authentic
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
192.168.0.110:126 inet n - - - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:33:48AM -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> 192.168.0.110:126 inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_tls_security_level=may
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>
> connect with Thund
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I would have sworn I used to use Thunderbird with "SSL" specified and
connected to my Postfix servers fine. Now, I can only connect in "TLS"
mode. What did I break?
You no longer have smtps port enabled?
excerpted from master.cf - using non-standard port numbers f
Charles Marcus:
> On 2010-03-02 2:51 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > You've likely been using STARTTLS only, which doesn't require a key exchange
> > as SSL/TLS does.
>
> ? You sure about that? I use only STARTTLS, and I always have to do the
> 'Confirm Security Exception' dance to accept the certifi
On 2010-03-02 2:51 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You've likely been using STARTTLS only, which doesn't require a key exchange
> as SSL/TLS does.
? You sure about that? I use only STARTTLS, and I always have to do the
'Confirm Security Exception' dance to accept the certificate the first
time I send a
and
That's my take on it...
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org on behalf of Stan Hoeppner
Sent: Tue 3/2/2010 07:51
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: tls vs ssl
Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll jus
On 2.3.2010, at 9.18, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the way.
>
> Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
> in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix context?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL tries
Bill Landry put forth on 3/2/2010 2:01 AM:
> On 3/1/2010 11:51 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
>>> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the
>>> way.
>>>
>>> Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "
On 3/1/2010 11:51 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the
way.
Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix cont
Daniel L. Miller put forth on 3/2/2010 1:18 AM:
> OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the
> way.
>
> Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
> in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix context?
>
> I would have sworn I used
OK - I'm an idiot. I'll just admit that up front and get it out of the way.
Now that that's settled, what is the difference between "SSL" and "TLS"
in a MUA - particularly Thunderbird - in a Postfix context?
I would have sworn I used to use Thunderbird with "SSL" specified and
connected to my P
13 matches
Mail list logo
