On 3 sept. 2010, at 19:49, Mark Martinec wrote:
>> Machine does not look busy at all during those problems. Load is under 0.5
>> and CPU is 90% idle.
>> Even small emails are affected.
>
> If the host is not busy, again, my primary suspect is a berkeley db.
> These multiples of 20..25 second del
> Sep 2 13:00:47 ru amavis[87682]: (87682-15) TIMING [total 257879 ms] -
> SMTP greeting: 25055 (10%)10, SMTP EHLO: 0 (0%)10, SMTP pre-MAIL: 0 (0%)10,
> SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 7 (0%)10,
> SMTP DATA: 24052 (9%)19, check_init: 25053 (10%)29, digest_hdr: 1 (0%)29,
> digest_body: 0 (0%)29,
> gen_ma
On 3 sept. 2010, at 16:29, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>> Machine does not look busy at all during those problems. Load is under 0.5
>> and CPU is 90% idle. Even small emails are affected.
>
> Problem with DNS/RBL or something like that??
> It would explain slow responses without high machine loa
Zitat von Patrick Proniewski :
On 3 sept. 2010, at 13:02, Mark Martinec wrote:
Versions before amavisd-new 2.7.0 and SA older than 3.3.0 are
not particularly suitable for a pre-queue filtering setup.
The combined new features of 2.7.0, SA 3.3.* and the postfix
'speed_adjust' made such a setup
On 3 sept. 2010, at 13:02, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Versions before amavisd-new 2.7.0 and SA older than 3.3.0 are
> not particularly suitable for a pre-queue filtering setup.
> The combined new features of 2.7.0, SA 3.3.* and the postfix
> 'speed_adjust' made such a setup much better behaved.
>
> P
Patrick,
Versions before amavisd-new 2.7.0 and SA older than 3.3.0 are
not particularly suitable for a pre-queue filtering setup.
The combined new features of 2.7.0, SA 3.3.* and the postfix
'speed_adjust' made such a setup much better behaved.
Please read the introductory sections of 2.7.0 (pre)
On 2 sept. 2010, at 21:07, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> Theses days I've got a lot of warning in postfix logs like this one:
>>
>> smtp/smtpd[91607]: warning: timeout talking to proxy 127.0.0.1:10024
> Why ? What is amavis doing at that moment ?
not sure, but probably trying to end a +250 seco
On 09/02/2010 02:19 PM, Patrick Proniewski wrote:
Hi all,
intro: I won't ask for amavis fix, I just need to make sure my postfix config
is ok before getting support elsewhere with amavis ;)
I've a bit of trouble with my production mail gateway:
FreeBSD 7.x in VMWare Virtual Machine, r
Hi all,
intro: I won't ask for amavis fix, I just need to make sure my postfix config
is ok before getting support elsewhere with amavis ;)
I've a bit of trouble with my production mail gateway:
FreeBSD 7.x in VMWare Virtual Machine, running on top of a 6 blades HP
chassis, 4Go RAM and
