Jeroen Geilman put forth on 9/22/2010 5:06 PM:
>
> I don't know if anybody has run tests of this yet (it's still kinda
> new), but it would be instructive to compare a "regular" postfix setup
> (pre-postscreen) to a postscreen setup with fairly strict settings, with
> respect to the load when a la
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 9/22/2010 5:06 PM:
> I don't know if anybody has run tests of this yet (it's still kinda
> new), but it would be instructive to compare a "regular" postfix setup
> (pre-postscreen) to a postscreen setup with fairly strict settings, with
> respect to the load when a larg
On 09/22/2010 09:57 PM, Jay G. Scott wrote:
(at my site) spam arrives in big slugs. when a big
slug arrives sendmail will bog down--what wouldn't?
A properly configured postfix 2.7+ with postscreen wouldn't.
AFAIK your stated problem is exactly why postscreen was developed: to
keep k
RE: metrics for objective postfix vs. sendmail
Hi,
thanks to all who replied. i was going to summarize, but, then i
realized i'm not an authority and should leave that to others, like
Victor Duchovni.
anyhoo, i'm gonna call this one done. i'm committed to switching
to postfix. (i already wa
