DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> OpenSSH is also an
> option, the latest release even supports Unix domain socket forwarding.
Uurrgs! I definitely don't want to give SSH access!
Yes, I could start another restricted sshd but that's too complex given that I
can very easily implement SSL/TLS support at th
On 10 Jan 2015, at 23:45, Michael Ströder wrote:
> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>> Viktor Dukhovni:
>>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 08:22:17PM +0100, Michael Str?der wrote:
>>>
Are there any plans to support encrypted connections with tcp_table(5)
maps?
Something like
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 08:22:17PM +0100, Michael Str?der wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any plans to support encrypted connections with tcp_table(5) maps?
>>> Something like a stcp: map?
>>>
>>> Of course I can use stunnel -c but it would
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 08:22:17PM +0100, Michael Str?der wrote:
>
> > Are there any plans to support encrypted connections with tcp_table(5) maps?
> > Something like a stcp: map?
> >
> > Of course I can use stunnel -c but it would be nice if it's possible without
> > another m
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 08:22:17PM +0100, Michael Str?der wrote:
> Are there any plans to support encrypted connections with tcp_table(5) maps?
> Something like a stcp: map?
>
> Of course I can use stunnel -c but it would be nice if it's possible without
> another moving part.
The Unix philosoph
HI!
Are there any plans to support encrypted connections with tcp_table(5) maps?
Something like a stcp: map?
Of course I can use stunnel -c but it would be nice if it's possible without
another moving part.
Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
