On 2010-02-19 David Koski wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2010-02-14 David Koski wrote:
>>> How about something more simple: test for From: is the same as To:
>>> and is from MAILER-DAEMON:
>>>
>>> grep "^From:.*" "$test" \
>>> && grep "Return-Path:.*" "$test" \
>>
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 23:39 -0800, David Koski wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> > On 2010-02-14 David Koski wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> > >> On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
> > >>> My mail server has been getting a fair amount of s
On Monday 15 February 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-02-14 David Koski wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> >> On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
> >>> My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have
> >>> been rejected but the sender address is
On Monday 15 February 2010, wolfgang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In an older episode (Monday, 15. February 2010), David Koski wrote:
> > grep "^From:.*" "$test" \
> > && grep "Return-Path:.*" "$test" \
>
> the "Return-Path" of an NDR is *not* .*MAILER-DAEMON.* - it is "<>".
>
> "mailer-daemon" would be in the
Hi,
In an older episode (Monday, 15. February 2010), David Koski wrote:
> grep "^From:.*" "$test" \
> && grep "Return-Path:.*" "$test" \
the "Return-Path" of an NDR is *not* .*MAILER-DAEMON.* - it is "<>".
"mailer-daemon" would be in the From-Header of the NDR
Regards,
wolfgang
On 2010-02-14 David Koski wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
>> On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
>>> My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have
>>> been rejected but the sender address is spoofed with the recipient's
>>> address. This generates an
behalf of David Koski
Sent: Mon 2/15/2010 03:19
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: suppress NDRs from spoofed sender
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
> > My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have
> &
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
> > My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have
> > been rejected but the sender address is spoofed with the recipient's
> > address. This generates an NDR to the recipient with the spam.
On 1/18/2010 11:47 PM, David Koski wrote:
My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have been
rejected but the sender address is spoofed with the recipient's address.
This generates an NDR to the recipient with the spam. I would like to
suppress NDRs of this kind but not le
On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
> My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have
> been rejected but the sender address is spoofed with the recipient's
> address. This generates an NDR to the recipient with the spam. I
> would like to suppress NDRs of this kind but not legi
My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have been
rejected but the sender address is spoofed with the recipient's address.
This generates an NDR to the recipient with the spam. I would like to
suppress NDRs of this kind but not legitimate NDRs.
Regards,
David Koski
da.
11 matches
Mail list logo