Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
The cache has two main functions:
1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and
reduce load on both.
2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail
acceptance/rejection when the destination
Mark Goodge:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Mark Goodge:
> >>
> >> The cache has two main functions:
> >>
> >> 1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and
> >> reduce load on both.
> >>
> >> 2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail
> >> acceptance/rejection whe
Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Goodge:
The cache has two main functions:
1. To reduce traffic between the gateway and destination server, and
reduce load on both.
2. To allow the gateway server to correctly handle mail
acceptance/rejection when the destination server is unreachable.
If the ca
Mark Goodge:
> Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
> >>> On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
>
> What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
> I will not be notified an
Noel Jones wrote:
On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
recr
On 12/15/2009, Noel Jones (njo...@megan.vbhcs.org) wrote:
> On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
>>> On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until I will not be
no
On 12/15/2009 7:30 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
recreate it again.
I
On 12/14/2009, Jaroslaw Grzabel (ja...@meil.me) wrote:
> Simon Waters pisze:
>> It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon
>> starts getting email (and spam potentially). This is configurable.
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/verify.8.html
> Yeah, and it works on the other way rou
On 12/14/2009, Simon Waters (sim...@zynet.net) wrote:
> On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
>>
>> What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
>> I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
>> recreate it again.
> It refreshes cache at 3 hours by defa
On 12/14/2009 1:02 PM, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Simon Waters pisze:
It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon starts
getting email (and spam potentially). This is configurable.
http://www.postfix.org/verify.8.html
Yeah, and it works on the other way round... if my customer
Simon Waters pisze:
It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon starts getting
email (and spam potentially). This is configurable.
http://www.postfix.org/verify.8.html
Yeah, and it works on the other way round... if my customer's server
will go down for more than 3h, my
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:35:39 Simon Waters wrote:
>
> It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon starts
Oops 3 hours even.
On Monday 14 December 2009 14:24:34 Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
>
> What postfix does ? Reject all messages until
> I will not be notified and remove the database and let postfix to
> recreate it again.
It refreshes cache at 3 hours by default, so within 3 days jon starts getting
email (and spam pote
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:24 +, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Martijn de Munnik wrote:
>
> > > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#caching
> > >
> >
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> The only problem with that database is that if customer add some users
> in
On 12/14/09 4:24 PM, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#caching
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your reply.
The only problem with that database is that if customer add some users
into his machine then database will always reje
Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> > http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#caching
> >
>
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your reply.
The only problem with that database is that if customer add some users
into his machine then database will always reject that email... let's
say for examp
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 13:32 +, Jaroslaw Grzabel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just had a hard nut to crack, as I've got SMTP server which stores
> and forwards or I only hoped so. Why ? As I checked now if the
> remote server is down, and I use reject_unverified_recipient it gives me
> an err
Hi,
I've just had a hard nut to crack, as I've got SMTP server which stores
and forwards or I only hoped so. Why ? As I checked now if the
remote server is down, and I use reject_unverified_recipient it gives me
an error like:
450 4.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: unverified
address: c
18 matches
Mail list logo
