On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:49:17 +0200
martin f krafft articulated:
> also sprach Noel Jones [2010.10.04.0507
> +0200]:
> > Lots easier to just use
> > /^myhostname(\.mydomain)?$/ REJECT don't use my hostname
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded. I am now going the suggested way.
>
> However,
also sprach Noel Jones [2010.10.04.0507 +0200]:
> Lots easier to just use
> /^myhostname(\.mydomain)?$/ REJECT don't use my hostname
Thanks to everyone who responded. I am now going the suggested way.
However, it occurs to me that this is something postfix could be
trivially doing itself,
On 10/3/2010 7:34 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
Dear list,
I found that a lot of spam can be weeded out by rejecting clients
who greet me with my own hostname. Initially, I achieved this with
the following:
main.cf:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
[…]
check_helo_access pcre:$config
martin f krafft put forth on 10/3/2010 7:34 AM:
> Dear list,
>
> I found that a lot of spam can be weeded out by rejecting clients
> who greet me with my own hostname. Initially, I achieved this with
> the following:
>
> main.cf:
> smtpd_helo_restrictions =
> […]
> check_helo_ac
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.10.03.1456 +0200]:
> How can I use a static map to return a "5xx message" result?
According to http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0208/0380.html,
what I am trying to do is simply not possible. Is this still the
case?
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://t
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.10.03.1434 +0200]:
> check_helo_access static:554
>
> but that got the message accepted too.
I found in access(5):
ACCEPT ACTIONS
all-numerical
An all-numerical result is treated as OK. This
format is generat
Dear list,
I found that a lot of spam can be weeded out by rejecting clients
who greet me with my own hostname. Initially, I achieved this with
the following:
main.cf:
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
[…]
check_helo_access pcre:$config_directory/reject_helo_myhostname
reject_helo_my