On Fri, 19 May 2017 10:53:56 -0400
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > So, according to you I should add:
> >
> > smtp_destination_concurrency_limit = 1
>
> That's too fragile, at least without further tuning. With this,
> when any connection fails the destination concurrency is reduced
> to 0, and the
> On May 19, 2017, at 10:02 AM, richard lucassen
> wrote:
>
> Ah, that might be the issue then, when I leave these parameters
> set to their defaults, it would mean that the maximum Postfix will send
> at once is 20 mails containing 50 recipients?
>
> So, according to you I should add:
>
> s
My setup was
default_destination_concurrency_limit = 1
default_destination_recipient_limit = 25
I never had major problems with this, it was only a little bit slow with
gmail, yahoo and other big mail accounts providers, anyway never a real
issue.
This setup is probably not perfect if you ha
On Fri, 19 May 2017 15:52:05 +0200
marco wrote:
> > So if I understand the docs correctly, setting this parameter to
> > e.g.default_destination_concurrency_limit = 1 25 has the following
> > result:
> >
> > 1 message sent to 100 rcpt's -> postfix -> 4 messages to 25 rcpt's
> >
> > Note: 100 rcpt
Il 19. 05. 17 15:27, richard lucassen ha scritto:
On Fri, 19 May 2017 07:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
Searching a bit I found this setting:
smtp_destination_recipient_limit
This defaults to 50. Is this the right parameter to adjust?
Maybe. In the fight agai
On Fri, 19 May 2017 07:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> > Searching a bit I found this setting:
> >
> > smtp_destination_recipient_limit
> >
> > This defaults to 50. Is this the right parameter to adjust?
>
> Maybe. In the fight against spam, mail server operators
Hello.
I have been supporting for years no-profit organizations, that have been
sending a number of mails to 1 and more recipients at the same time.
After similar initial problems the solution never giving any major issue was
*default_destination_concurrency_limit = 1*
*default_destinatio
richard lucassen:
> Hello list,
>
> For a few reasons I use an outgoing postfix as smarthost. The source
> mailserver is an exchange. Before the postfix server was in use,
> sending mail to a bunch of recipients at a domain which is hosted by
> outlook.com was no problem. When the mail passes thro
Hello list,
For a few reasons I use an outgoing postfix as smarthost. The source
mailserver is an exchange. Before the postfix server was in use,
sending mail to a bunch of recipients at a domain which is hosted by
outlook.com was no problem. When the mail passes through postfix, mail
to many reci
