On 8/9/2012 3:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> On 8/9/2012 12:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Noel Jones:
On 8/9/2012 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> It might be practical to add a note that in some cases, soft_bounce=yes
> is implemented by modifying server responses. The
Noel Jones:
> On 8/9/2012 12:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Noel Jones:
> >> On 8/9/2012 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>> It might be practical to add a note that in some cases, soft_bounce=yes
> >>> is implemented by modifying server responses. Therefore, the responses
> >>> that Postfix will
On 8/9/2012 12:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Noel Jones:
>> On 8/9/2012 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> It might be practical to add a note that in some cases, soft_bounce=yes
>>> is implemented by modifying server responses. Therefore, the responses
>>> that Postfix will log may differ from the
Noel Jones:
> On 8/9/2012 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > It might be practical to add a note that in some cases, soft_bounce=yes
> > is implemented by modifying server responses. Therefore, the responses
> > that Postfix will log may differ from the responses that Postfix
> > actually sends or
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:57:00AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/9/2012 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > It might be practical to add a note that in some cases, soft_bounce=yes
> > is implemented by modifying server responses. Therefore, the responses
> > that Postfix will log may differ from t
On 8/9/2012 11:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> It might be practical to add a note that in some cases, soft_bounce=yes
> is implemented by modifying server responses. Therefore, the responses
> that Postfix will log may differ from the responses that Postfix
> actually sends or receives. This will b
Noel Jones:
> On 8/9/2012 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >
> > The CLEANUP DAEMON rejects the header with 5cc
> >
> > The SMTP DAEMON transforms the reply into 4XX.
> >
> > The CLEANUP DAEMON does not know that the SMTP DAEMON has soft_bounce=yes.
> >
>
> maybe a note on the soft_bounce do
On 8/9/2012 6:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The CLEANUP DAEMON rejects the header with 5cc
>
> The SMTP DAEMON transforms the reply into 4XX.
>
> The CLEANUP DAEMON does not know that the SMTP DAEMON has soft_bounce=yes.
>
maybe a note on the soft_bounce docs?
Something like:
Note: with "s
mailing list subscriber:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> > On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
> >>
> >> In summary,
> >>
> >> Why do body/he
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
>>
>> In summary,
>>
>> Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
>
>
> soft_bounce works as docu
On 8/8/2012 4:22 AM, mailing list subscriber wrote:
> Hi,
> I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
>
> In summary,
>
> Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
soft_bounce works as documented. The log may show a 5.x.x extended
status code, but th
Hi,
I asked this earlier but maybe skipped your attention.
In summary,
Why do body/header checks generate 5xx rejects even with soft_bounce=yes?
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:21 AM, mailing list subscriber
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two issues.
> After hard reading of MULTI_INSTANCE_README I've
update: interesting, header_check gives 5xx but user unknown gives
correct 4xx response:
Jul 30 01:49:01 mailhost postfix-in/smtpd[3685]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from relay3.isp.ro[IP_ADDR]: 450 4.1.1 :
Recipient address rejected: User unknown;
from=
to= proto=ESMTP helo=
13 matches
Mail list logo
