Re: smtpd_foo_restrictions sanity check

2009-12-18 Thread Stan Hoeppner
mouss put forth on 12/17/2009 7:40 AM: > No. maybe did you remove a firewall block? postfix does rdns check for > all connections (unless you disable that) so you should see the warnings > however you order your smtpd checks. No firewall changes. I did recently switch my dns resolvers to the new

Re: smtpd_foo_restrictions sanity check

2009-12-17 Thread mouss
Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > mouss put forth on 12/16/2009 5:52 PM: > >> these are rdns warnings. the usual stuff. they are good for >> "information", because when you get other logs, you'll see "from >> unknown[a.b.c.d]", so if you want the PTR, you can consolidate the >> warning logs (I do this wit

Re: smtpd_foo_restrictions sanity check

2009-12-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
mouss put forth on 12/16/2009 5:52 PM: > these are rdns warnings. the usual stuff. they are good for > "information", because when you get other logs, you'll see "from > unknown[a.b.c.d]", so if you want the PTR, you can consolidate the > warning logs (I do this with a script because I want to see

Re: smtpd_foo_restrictions sanity check

2009-12-16 Thread mouss
Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > I finally consolidated all my smtpd_foo_restrictions into > smtpd_recipient_restrictions, as many have suggested, mainly to get my > whitelisting working properly/reliably. Since doing so, I've noticed a > substantial increase in smtpd warnings. Is this smtpd warning inc

smtpd_foo_restrictions sanity check

2009-12-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
I finally consolidated all my smtpd_foo_restrictions into smtpd_recipient_restrictions, as many have suggested, mainly to get my whitelisting working properly/reliably. Since doing so, I've noticed a substantial increase in smtpd warnings. Is this smtpd warning increase a result of this consolida