Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread Noel Jones
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/5/2013 9:52 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 07/05/2013 04:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote: >> >>> Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way >>> it works now so I modified my

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread W T Riker
On 7/5/2013 10:52 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote: > On 07/05/2013 04:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote: >> >>> Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way it works now >>> so I modified my restrictions a bit. Does this order pass the sn

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 07/05/2013 04:07 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote: > >> Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way it works now >> so I modified my restrictions a bit. Does this order pass the sniff test? >> >> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread W T Riker
Thanks. I fixed it. On 7/5/2013 10:07 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote: > >> Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way it works now >> so I modified my restrictions a bit. Does this order pass the sniff test? >> >> smtpd_recipie

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:00:02AM -0400, W T Riker wrote: > Thanks for that explanation. I think I understand the way it works now > so I modified my restrictions a bit. Does this order pass the sniff test? > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > reject_non_fqdn_recipient, > reject_

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread W T Riker
On 7/5/2013 9:51 AM, Larry Stone wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, W T Riker wrote: > >> Indeed this is using port 587. I did not realize that that in itself was >> sufficient to prevent relaying from non-authenticated clients. Thanks. > > It doesn't. If 587 is configured the same as 25, it will behave

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread Larry Stone
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013, W T Riker wrote: Indeed this is using port 587. I did not realize that that in itself was sufficient to prevent relaying from non-authenticated clients. Thanks. It doesn't. If 587 is configured the same as 25, it will behave just like port 25. There is nothing special abou

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread W T Riker
On 7/4/2013 11:21 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 7/4/2013 7:44 PM, W T Riker wrote: >> On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> W T Riker: On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > gw1500: >> It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do >> it but I wan

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-05 Thread W T Riker
On 7/5/2013 12:27 AM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: > On Jul 4, 2013, at 20.44, W T Riker wrote: > >> On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> W T Riker: On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > gw1500: >> It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do >

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread btb
On Jul 4, 2013, at 20.44, W T Riker wrote: > On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> W T Riker: >>> On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: gw1500: > It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do > it but I want to make authentication optional but if

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 7/4/2013 7:44 PM, W T Riker wrote: > On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >> W T Riker: >>> On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: gw1500: > It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do > it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread W T Riker
On 7/4/2013 8:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > W T Riker: >> On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> gw1500: It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user does authenticate then I want to permit

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread Wietse Venema
W T Riker: > On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > gw1500: > >> It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do > >> it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user does > >> authenticate then I want to permit relaying. Can someone help? > > This is how p

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread W T Riker
On 7/4/2013 8:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > gw1500: >> It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do >> it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user does >> authenticate then I want to permit relaying. Can someone help? > This is how permit_sasl_authenticate

Re: smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread Wietse Venema
gw1500: > It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do > it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user does > authenticate then I want to permit relaying. Can someone help? This is how permit_sasl_authenticated works. http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.htm

smtpd optional authentication and relay

2013-07-04 Thread gw1500
It is not clear from the documentation if this is possible or how to do it but I want to make authentication optional but if a user does authenticate then I want to permit relaying. Can someone help?