Konrad Rzepecki:
> Dnia _roda, 17 grudnia 2008, Wietse Venema napisa_:
>
> > > > Your defer daemons aren't working.
> > >
> > > If you mean this one:
> > > postfix 29426 0.0 0.1 6472 1740 ?S14:24 0:00 bounce
> > > -z -n defer -t unix -u
> > >
> > > it seems running...
> >
> > A
Dnia środa, 17 grudnia 2008, Wietse Venema napisał:
> > > Your defer daemons aren't working.
> >
> > If you mean this one:
> > postfix 29426 0.0 0.1 6472 1740 ?S14:24 0:00 bounce
> > -z -n defer -t unix -u
> >
> > it seems running...
>
> And what is it doing?
You have right -
Konrad Rzepecki:
> > > #3 0x0806f20f in vstream_buf_get_ready (bp=0x80918f0) at vstream.c:731
> > > #4 0x0806eaf7 in vbuf_get (bp=0x80918f0) at vbuf.c:157
> > > #5 0x08063bcb in attr_vscan0 (fp=0x80918f0, flags=3, ap=0xafb16988
> > > "\001") at
> > > attr_scan0.c:272
> > > #6 0x08063f9b in attr
Dnia środa, 17 grudnia 2008, Wietse Venema napisał:
> > #1 0x0806d01f in read_wait (fd=-4, timeout=3600) at read_wait.c:120
> > #2 0x08072241 in timed_read (fd=13, buf=0x8092d60, len=4096,
> > timeout=3600, unused_context=0x0) at timed_read.c:73
>
> That makes no sense. timed_read() does not chan
> #1 0x0806d01f in read_wait (fd=-4, timeout=3600) at read_wait.c:120
> #2 0x08072241 in timed_read (fd=13, buf=0x8092d60, len=4096, timeout=3600,
> unused_context=0x0) at timed_read.c:73
That makes no sense. timed_read() does not change its argument as shown
below. But it does not matter. The
Hi
I have big problem with soft bounces. Take a look for following transaction
log (I have change dest mail to fake one):
Dec 17 12:03:39 www postfix/smtp[17276]: vstream_buf_get_ready: fd 12 got 87
12:03:39 www postfix/smtp[17276]: < mx.poczta.onet.pl[213.180.130.8 220
mx.poczta.onet.
