Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-26 Thread Thomas Minor
Hi Viktor, thanks for the answer. I'll try to suggest this to the other servers admin team. Since I do not know if they consider this, I'll stick to disabled default connection reuse. I'm interested which end of the connection is responsible of the problem, I'll setup a test for this sometime.

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-26 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Feb 26, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Thomas Minor wrote: > > And, on the other side, postfix as a client > should not reuse a dead connection. Postfix (somewhat obviously) cannot "reuse" a closed connection. The other server must have kept open. It is in principle possible to add a feature to limit

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-26 Thread Thomas Minor
Ahh, ok, now i got it. I thought, a similar question was already answered but it seems I missed the answer on my own question, sorry. It stayed in my outgoing box an I assumed, there was a delivery problem. That's why I sent it twice. Back to the problem, as I pointed out, the delivery attempt

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-24 Thread Alex JOST
Am 24.02.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Thomas Minor: Hmm, ok, I did search but found nothing. I'll check again. http://marc.info/?t=14876316702&r=1&w=2 -- Alex JOST

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-24 Thread Thomas Minor
Hmm, ok, I did search but found nothing. I'll check again. --Thomas Am 22.02.2017 um 21:51 schrieb Wietse Venema: > Thomas Minor: >> Hello, >> >> I might have a problem with the smtp_connection cache. >> Regarding documentation, the cache is enabled on demand by default. > This question was al

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Thomas Minor: > Hello, > > I might have a problem with the smtp_connection cache. > Regarding documentation, the cache is enabled on demand by default. This question was already answered. Use youe search engine. Wietse

smtp-cache problem

2017-02-22 Thread Thomas Minor
Hello, I might have a problem with the smtp_connection cache. Regarding documentation, the cache is enabled on demand by default. I found a peer site, which is also driven by postfix, with uses greylisting. I have some 3000 mails to send to this particular server, which starts the session by gre

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-20 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Feb 20, 2017, at 7:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Why should Postfix abandon a connection that replies with 4xx to a > recipient? How is this different from sending a multi-recipient > message? I guess because hard error limits may induce tarpit controls on the receiving side? Mind you,

Re: smtp-cache problem

2017-02-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Thomas Minor: > Hello, > > I might have a problem with the smtp_connection cache. > Regarding documentation, the cache is enabled on demand by default. > > I found a peer site, which is also driven by postfix, with uses greylisting. > I have some 3000 mails to send to this particular server, whic

smtp-cache problem

2017-02-20 Thread Thomas Minor
Hello, I might have a problem with the smtp_connection cache. Regarding documentation, the cache is enabled on demand by default. I found a peer site, which is also driven by postfix, with uses greylisting. I have some 3000 mails to send to this particular server, which starts the session by gre