Re: Fw: sasldb or PAM

2011-11-07 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
secure. It depends on your PAM backend. p@rick > > - Original Message - > From: Patrick Ben Koetter > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 11:06 AM > Subject: Re: sasldb or PAM > > > * gaby : > > I use PAM authentication meth

Fw: sasldb or PAM

2011-11-07 Thread gaby
I use TLS withPAM,but what is disadvantage PAM versus sasldb ? Sasldb is more security? - Original Message - From: Patrick Ben Koetter To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 11:06 AM Subject: Re: sasldb or PAM * gaby : > I use PAM authentication method

Re: sasldb or PAM

2011-11-07 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* gaby : > I use PAM authentication method for send emal via postfix with Cyrus Sasl. > If use sasldb2 method instead PAM,it is more secure, or more Ok?Sasdb is > more usable? There are two sections you need to pay attention for: 1. Transmission of identification data over the network 2. Stor

sasldb or PAM

2011-11-07 Thread gaby
Hi I use PAM authentication method for send emal via postfix with Cyrus Sasl. If use sasldb2 method instead PAM,it is more secure, or more Ok?Sasdb is more usable? Thanks