Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-11 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 11.12.2014 um 16:27 schrieb Kris Deugau: Richard Damon wrote: Minor nit, SPAM filters really don't determine compliance to the standards, they determine the likelihood of a message being "undesirable". If being 100% compliant to the RFCs made a message immune to being detected as spam, then

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-11 Thread Kris Deugau
Richard Damon wrote: > Minor nit, SPAM filters really don't determine compliance to the > standards, they determine the likelihood of a message being > "undesirable". If being 100% compliant to the RFCs made a message immune > to being detected as spam, then there would suddenly be a LOT of 100% >

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-11 Thread Christian Rößner
> Am 10.12.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Peter Volkov : > > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. I attach a very simple example which I use in Zabbix, writtien in Python. Best wishes Christian #!/usr/bin/env python2.7 import os import sys import smtplib import time import hashlib

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread Richard Damon
On 12/10/14, 3:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Peter Volkov: ? ??, 10/12/2014 ? 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema ?: Peter Volkov: We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does that. Now, as I see postfix set

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread Michael Ströder
li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > Am 10.12.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Peter Volkov: >> We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from >> tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does >> that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as: >> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -08

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Peter Volkov: > ? ??, 10/12/2014 ? 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema ?: > > Peter Volkov: > > > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from > > > tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does > > > that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as: > > > Date: W

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread Peter Volkov
В Ср, 10/12/2014 в 14:35 -0500, Wietse Venema пишет: > Peter Volkov: > > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from > > tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does > > that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as: > > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Peter Volkov: > Hi. > > We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from > tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does > that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as: > Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -0800 (PST) The (PST) is a comment. Surely, their pars

Re: rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 10.12.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Peter Volkov: We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -0800 (PST) According to rfc 5322 3.6

rfc5322 compliance of Date: field

2014-12-10 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. We use smtplib in python to send mail through postfix. As I saw from tcpdump smtplib does not set "Date:" field, so I suspect postfix does that. Now, as I see postfix sets date as: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 05:40:50 -0800 (PST) According to rfc 5322 3.6.1. "The Origination Date Field" last part