Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Jan 27, 2021, at 9:40 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > Correct, its a dynamic value. It can only be known by reading the reply-to
> > value from the headers of the same message.
>
> One way to do this entirely in Postfix is to:
>
> 1. Delete the evil "From:" header that ma
Andy Smith:
> On 28-01-2021 00:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:30:25PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> >
> > Indeed, though I usually avoid falling in that trap, perhaps I failed
> > in
> > this case to consider whether the user is asking the right question.
> >
> >
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 9:40 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> Correct, its a dynamic value. It can only be known by reading the reply-to
> value from the headers of the same message.
One way to do this entirely in Postfix is to:
1. Delete the evil "From:" header that matches the "www" user
on input
On 28-01-2021 00:14, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:30:25PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Indeed, though I usually avoid falling in that trap, perhaps I failed
in
this case to consider whether the user is asking the right question.
If the problem value of the "From:" head
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:30:25PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> It's simple enough to replace all instances of w...@example.com with
> something else:
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> canonical_maps =
> inline:{
> { w...@example.com = other@address }
> }
>
> That will
Andy Smith:
> On 27-01-2021 20:48, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > If absolutely every single message is guaranteed to have a "Reply-To:"
> > that can safely replace "From:", then you could in theory forcibly
> > remove "From:" from every message, and upon encountering "Reply-To:"
> > generate a new
On 27-01-2021 20:48, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
If absolutely every single message is guaranteed to have a "Reply-To:"
that can safely replace "From:", then you could in theory forcibly
remove "From:" from every message, and upon encountering "Reply-To:"
generate a new matching "From:" (via header_c
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 07:05:37PM +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > In my case it is safe to assume that all mail from this user (www user)
> > will always have "Reply-To" as they are generated by the program Request
> > Tracker which always includes this header. If it were an i
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 07:05:37PM +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
> In my case it is safe to assume that all mail from this user (www user)
> will always have "Reply-To" as they are generated by the program Request
> Tracker which always includes this header. If it were an issue I guess
> before the
On 27-01-2021 18:48, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Can you more precise in your description, perhaps with a hypothetical
example specifying precisely the form of the input message envelope
and headers and the desired output values of the same.
to be the same as the existing "Reply-To" address from t
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 06:12:35PM +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
> I need to rewrite an address (known/fixed, is the localaddress of the
> user sending the email)
I am having trouble parsing this. Email messages have:
- An envelope-sender, specified via the SMTP "MAIL FROM:" command
prior
Hi there!
I wonder if someone would be able to help configure a rewrite? I need
to rewrite an address (known/fixed, is the localaddress of the user
sending the email) to be the same as the existing "Reply-To" address
from the message. Ie in Exim I can use the variable "$reply_address". If
anyon
12 matches
Mail list logo
