Re: v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-18 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 7/18/2012 9:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Darren Pilgrim: On 2012-07-18 03:08, Wietse Venema wrote: Darren Pilgrim: inet_protocols = ipv4 Well there is your problem. No, that was postconf -n from the working config (which is ipv4 only). I offered to help, and you sent the configuration

Re: v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Darren Pilgrim: > On 2012-07-18 03:08, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Darren Pilgrim: > >> inet_protocols = ipv4 > > > > Well there is your problem. > > No, that was postconf -n from the working config (which is ipv4 only). I offered to help, and you sent the configuration of a different machine? I wi

Re: v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-18 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2012-07-18 03:08, Wietse Venema wrote: Darren Pilgrim: inet_protocols = ipv4 Well there is your problem. No, that was postconf -n from the working config (which is ipv4 only). Per the first email, I set inet protocols = ipv4, ipv6 when I added the IPv6 address.

Re: v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Darren Pilgrim: > inet_protocols = ipv4 Well there is your problem. Wietse

Re: v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-17 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2012-07-17 03:58, Wietse Venema wrote: Darren Pilgrim: I have Postfix v2.9.1 installed from ports. My OS is: # uname -a FreeBSD catnip.pilgrimaccounting.com 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 #0: Thu Jun 14 13:08:22 PDT 2012 r...@catnip.pilgrimaccounting.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CATNIP a

Re: v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Darren Pilgrim: > I have Postfix v2.9.1 installed from ports. My OS is: > # uname -a > FreeBSD catnip.pilgrimaccounting.com 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD > 8.3-RELEASE-p3 #0: Thu Jun 14 13:08:22 PDT 2012 > r...@catnip.pilgrimaccounting.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CATNIP amd64 > > When I enable IPv6 with

v2.9.1 not doing IPv6 reverse lookups correctly

2012-07-16 Thread Darren Pilgrim
I have Postfix v2.9.1 installed from ports. My OS is: # uname -a FreeBSD catnip.pilgrimaccounting.com 8.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 #0: Thu Jun 14 13:08:22 PDT 2012 r...@catnip.pilgrimaccounting.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CATNIP amd64 When I enable IPv6 with the following in main.cf:

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread Jorey Bump
ghe wrote, at 04/10/2009 02:54 PM: > Oh, dear! I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do about this, but > thanks to you all for the response(s). Maybe a non-caching name server > might help. You've only indicated that an authenticated client's IP address does not reliably provide a reverse lookup

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread J.P. Trosclair
ghe wrote: Oh, dear! I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do about this, but thanks to you all for the response(s). Maybe a non-caching name server might help. I don't think there's anything you can do about it. The settings for how long a cached record stays alive and when an update is atte

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread ghe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 J.P. Trosclair wrote: > SBC Global's ns1.swbell.net does answer with the appropriate IP address, > but neither our companies name servers or my local dns on my home > network can resolve adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net. I > restarted named

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread J.P. Trosclair
Yes it does: # host adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net has address 99.29.103.142 SBC Global's ns1.swbell.net does answer with the appropriate IP address, but neither our companies name servers or my local dns on my home network can resolve

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
ghe: > Wietse Venema wrote: > > >>> # host 99.29.103.142 > >>> 142.103.29.99.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer > >>> adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net. > >> As far as I know, this is the only Blackberry using this mail server. > >> Other hosts/domains/devices don't have this problem. Can

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:41:51AM -0600, ghe wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Wietse Venema wrote: > > >>> # host 99.29.103.142 > >>> 142.103.29.99.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer > >>> adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net. > >> As far as I know, this is the

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread ghe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wietse Venema wrote: >>> # host 99.29.103.142 >>> 142.103.29.99.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer >>> adsl-99-29-103-142.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net. >> As far as I know, this is the only Blackberry using this mail server. >> Other hosts/domains/devices

Re: reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread Wietse Venema
ghe: > I'm getting log entries like this: > > > Apr 2 12:55:53 ralph postfix/smtpd[15788]: 779DFC6D76: > > client=unknown[99.29.103.142], sasl_method=LOGIN, sasl_username=joelqw > > This is one of my users' Blackberry. Notice that Postfix (or maybe it's > Dovecot, in the sasl verification) is s

reverse lookups

2009-04-10 Thread ghe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm getting log entries like this: > Apr 2 12:55:53 ralph postfix/smtpd[15788]: 779DFC6D76: > client=unknown[99.29.103.142], sasl_method=LOGIN, sasl_username=joelqw This is one of my users' Blackberry. Notice that Postfix (or maybe it's Dovecot, in