Re: remark on postscreen behavior in case of big MTA pool - CIDR list needed

2012-03-30 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:02:28AM +0200, Maciej Uhlig wrote: > So, google.com got 450 from postscreen and repeated delivery from > _other_ IP and then got another 450. It's possible the mail would > not be delivered at all if google.com had sent it from different 60 > thousands :-) IP addresses

Re: remark on postscreen behavior in case of big MTA pool - CIDR list needed

2012-03-30 Thread Maciej Uhlig
Wietse Venema: > Don't turn on the "after 220 greeting" tests if you don't want to live > with the consequences of doing so. Actually we wanted to have "greylisting" active knowing the consequences, which is mail delay. However, _infinite_ mail delay by google.com showed up as a side effect...

Re: remark on postscreen behavior in case of big MTA pool - CIDR list needed

2012-03-30 Thread Wietse Venema
Maciej Uhlig: > We found the following in postfix log while expecting test mail delivery: > > 2012-03-29T13:32:41+02:00 services/192.168.10.210 > postfix/postscreen[1697]: [ID 197553 mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT > from [74.125.83.53]:56421: 450 4.3.2 Service currently unavailable; > from=mailt

Re: remark on postscreen behavior in case of big MTA pool - CIDR list needed

2012-03-30 Thread Peter
On 30/03/12 21:02, Maciej Uhlig wrote: > So, google.com got 450 from postscreen and repeated delivery from > _other_ IP and then got another 450. It's possible the mail would not be > delivered at all if google.com had sent it from different 60 thousands > :-) IP addresses every time. > > The cure

remark on postscreen behavior in case of big MTA pool - CIDR list needed

2012-03-30 Thread Maciej Uhlig
We found the following in postfix log while expecting test mail delivery: 2012-03-29T13:32:41+02:00 services/192.168.10.210 postfix/postscreen[1697]: [ID 197553 mail.info] NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from [74.125.83.53]:56421: 450 4.3.2 Service currently unavailable; from=mailto:uh...@gazeta.pl>>, to=ma